Kodak Photo-Flo 200 Dilution?

3 Columns

A
3 Columns

  • 4
  • 5
  • 36
Couples

A
Couples

  • 3
  • 0
  • 70
Exhibition Card

A
Exhibition Card

  • 4
  • 4
  • 100
Flying Lady

A
Flying Lady

  • 6
  • 2
  • 118

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
199,044
Messages
2,785,261
Members
99,791
Latest member
EBlz568
Recent bookmarks
0
OP
OP
RalphLambrecht

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,658
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format
As indicated by the name, Kodak recommends a dilution for this wetting agent of 1:200. My experience is that I need far less (1+2,000) to avoid water marks, and our water is not very soft either.

How do you dilute Photo-Flo, and what are your experiences with this product?

same here. i use 1+1or200,and that's plenty.any more and i get fotoflo marks.
 

Pat Erson

Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2008
Messages
336
Format
35mm RF
I get very satisfying results since... I dumped Photoflo in favour of Ilford's Ilfotol!

Clearly Kodak's wetting agent is not very good (check the consistency of the substance, it's gooey and sticky... yuck!). Ilford's is MUCH better : as it's semi-liquid it won't leave white spots on your films.

Do the right thing, life's too short and your negs are too precious! :whistling:
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,145
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
I get very satisfying results since... I dumped Photoflo in favour of Ilford's Ilfotol!

Clearly Kodak's wetting agent is not very good (check the consistency of the substance, it's gooey and sticky... yuck!). Ilford's is MUCH better : as it's semi-liquid it won't leave white spots on your films.

Do the right thing, life's too short and your negs are too precious! :whistling:

My current bottle of Kodak Photo-Flo 200 is a clear liquid that flows like water. Maybe it is a slight bit more viscous, but not much. Any previous bottles I have worked with were very similar. If your Photo-flo is gooey and sticky, there is something wrong with it!
 

Vaughn

Subscriber
Joined
Dec 13, 2006
Messages
10,105
Location
Humboldt Co.
Format
Large Format
My current bottle of Kodak Photo-Flo 200 is a clear liquid that flows like water. Maybe it is a slight bit more viscous, but not much. Any previous bottles I have worked with were very similar. If your Photo-flo is gooey and sticky, there is something wrong with it!

Well, my Kodak Photo-Flo 2100 is a bit syrupy...:D
 
OP
OP
RalphLambrecht

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,658
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format
Gerald

Thanks for the clarification.

distilled water is a good idea,because it cuts down on the residue casing water marks in the first place, alcohol, if not overdone, speeds up the drying, but oo much can make the film brittle
 

Pat Erson

Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2008
Messages
336
Format
35mm RF
Gooey sirupy... It's all bad to me! Try ILfotol at least once, you might not look back ever!

(let me add I'm not a Kodak hater at all. And there's plenty of ppl who think PF could be the worst wetting agent on the market).
 

PeterB

Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2005
Messages
644
Location
Sydney, Aust
Format
Medium Format
On 17 August 2010 07:17, Richard Knoppow wrote:


"It was suggested by Micheal Gudzinowicz, a Phd chemist who used to frequent the pure-silver list:

To one liter of water add
2.5ml of Photo Flo 200 (half the recommended amount).
30ml of 70% isopropanol (rubbing alcohol).
Soak the film in this mixture for a minute or two and hang up to dry without squeegeeing.

The amounts are not critical and stronger alcohol can be used. Make sure the rubbing alchol you get is just isopropanol and water, not ethyl alcohol, which will be denatured with a solvent, or "flavored" rubbing alcohol with oil of wintergreen or something else in it."​
 
OP
OP
RalphLambrecht

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,658
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format
On 17 August 2010 07:17, Richard Knoppow wrote:


"It was suggested by Micheal Gudzinowicz, a Phd chemist who used to frequent the pure-silver list:

To one liter of water add
2.5ml of Photo Flo 200 (half the recommended amount).
30ml of 70% isopropanol (rubbing alcohol).
Soak the film in this mixture for a minute or two and hang up to dry without squeegeeing.

The amounts are not critical and stronger alcohol can be used. Make sure the rubbing alchol you get is just isopropanol and water, not ethyl alcohol, which will be denatured with a solvent, or "flavored" rubbing alcohol with oil of wintergreen or something else in it."​

i use this suggestion since 1839without having any issues.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
53,145
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format

NB23

Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2009
Messages
4,307
Format
35mm
I never measure. I just pour a few drops, shake and end of story.

But even the streaks are no big deal if/when they occur. A light whipe with a micro cloth takes care of the problem beautifuly.
 

Helinophoto

Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2011
Messages
1,088
Location
Norway
Format
Multi Format
No wonder you get streaks. :smile:

PhotoFlo -stock - is to be diluted to 1:200 -working solution-.
From that solution i put 1-2 -DROPS- from a pipette into the empty tank (into the hole of the reel) and then fill 500-600ml water.
- even that is enough for it to foam quite beautifully. (the foam does die down quite quickly though).

That means that the bottle of stock PhotoFlo will last a lifetime, and then some, since you use 1:200 to make a working solution, and only drops of that into your actual tank thereafter.

Using several milliliters of stock (or even the 1:200 working solution) is way too much, but I now know where there stories of gunk on reels comes from. :smile:

I didn't even know that some even use the PhotoFlo during development too, not sure why though, anyone know why?
 

bdial

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 2, 2005
Messages
7,470
Location
North East U.S.
Format
Multi Format
If that works for you, great. But, the working solution is the working solution, it shouldn't be diluted further for use.
That said, water varies quite a lot, and diluting more than 1:200 works better for some folks (including me).
 
OP
OP
RalphLambrecht

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,658
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format
The dilution you need varies with the quality of your water.
The 1:200 is probally for the worst case water quality.
I use distilled water for the final rinse and just a few drops is all I need.
that's what I ended up with too.
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
Photo-Flo contains an antifoaming agent which unfortunately can leave a residue especially with hard water. Kodak's recommendation is far too much. I use 3 to 5 drops per 250 ml (1 roll). The antifoaming agent is there for commercial installations with machine processing where foaming is an issue. The home user really doesn't need it. I now use a mix of Triton X-100 and proplylene glycol instead. This is the same as Photo-Flo but without the antifoaming agent.
 

bvy

Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2009
Messages
3,285
Location
Pittsburgh
Format
Multi Format
This is timely as I was about to post about continued problems with drying marks using PhotoFlo at the recommended dilution. I'm using distilled water for the last rinse before soaking and for the PhotoFlo solution itself. I really don't want to squeegee the film with my fingers if I can help it. Maybe I'll try cutting back.
 

Helinophoto

Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2011
Messages
1,088
Location
Norway
Format
Multi Format
I know that if i use too much (4-5 drops of the 1:200 working solution for 600ml water), i tend to get streaks and marks.

So this stuff seems to be designed to be used very sparingly.

I always wait until the bubbles are gone before lifting the reel out gently. Then i centrifuge the film by swinging the empty tank with the reel back and fourth a few times.

Gets rid of most excess water, seems to work.
 

silveror0

Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2007
Messages
364
Location
Seattle area, WA
Format
Large Format
I avoid all these problems by using Edwal LFN; one drop per 16oz distilled water. At this rate of consumption it'll outlast me.
Dead Link Removed

All it has to do is break the surface tension on the water droplets (as a surfactant).
 

bvy

Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2009
Messages
3,285
Location
Pittsburgh
Format
Multi Format
I avoid all these problems by using Edwal LFN; one drop per 16oz distilled water. At this rate of consumption it'll outlast me.
Dead Link Removed

All it has to do is break the surface tension on the water droplets (as a surfactant).
I had the same problem with Edwal LFN and distilled water. It's hard to use less than a drop (more water, yes, but I buy the water too). I went back to PhotoFlo.
 

bernard_L

Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2008
Messages
2,047
Format
Multi Format
Kodak recommends a dilution for this wetting agent of 1:200
Late at the party, but... On my bottle of Photo-Flo (that will outlive me too) the directions say dilute 1 part in 600.
The label also states: CAT 503 8286 Made in France by Kodak Pathé (back then there was this large Eastman Kodak facility at Châlons sur Saône, birthplace of Nicéphore Niepce).
I conform to that dilution using an eyedropper that I have calibrated, and use distilled(?) water for final rinse. Never wipe film. Never a water mark, never a dust speck.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom