Kodak new super 8 camera

A street portrait

A
A street portrait

  • 0
  • 0
  • 61
A street portrait

A
A street portrait

  • 1
  • 1
  • 59
img746.jpg

img746.jpg

  • 4
  • 0
  • 61
No Hall

No Hall

  • 1
  • 2
  • 64
Brentwood Kebab!

A
Brentwood Kebab!

  • 1
  • 1
  • 119

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,791
Messages
2,780,898
Members
99,705
Latest member
Hey_You
Recent bookmarks
0

RattyMouse

Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
6,045
Location
Ann Arbor, Mi
Format
Multi Format
I'm doubtful this camera will be launched at all. And if it does and becomes a commercial success - I hereby profess that I am a two-headed unicorn and will change my profile signature to reflect as much.

Kodak has been VERY shady this past week. They need to pull this camera off if they are to retain even a modicum of respectability.
 

aldevo

Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2004
Messages
949
Location
Cambridge, M
Format
Multi Format
Kodak has been VERY shady this past week. They need to pull this camera off if they are to retain even a modicum of respectability.

Pulling off that camera is the last thing they need. Like their tablets and phone it will be a conspicuous commercial failure. Best for all concerned at KODK that it never see the light of day.
 
Last edited:

aldevo

Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2004
Messages
949
Location
Cambridge, M
Format
Multi Format
Yeah I see the hipster vinyl, they like to play it on a portable record player. As I type this an idea just came to mind. They could have these player connects to the internet and the player read and figure out which album it is and then play the music from ITune.

Liked to - not like. You need to change your tenses. All it took to kill the vinyl revival were a few (accurate, unfortunately) articles this past summer indicating all those high-priced vinyl reissues weren't even made from the original analog masters and that was all she wrote as far as the revival was concerned. Talk to any record store owner - even those who sell actual records made from the analog masters. I've talked to several in the NE USA and their business went off a cliff in Q3 of this year. A cliff...

A $2,800 price (if true) for this camera ensures this won't even have the opportunity to flatter-only-to-disappoint. It's a non-starter from the word go.
 
Last edited:

aldevo

Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2004
Messages
949
Location
Cambridge, M
Format
Multi Format
I believe it has been reported that the Super 8 camera was not at CES. Only the bitcoin mining machines.

Yes, and did you notice that the mining machines didn't even have proper Kodak logos on them? The deal with Spotlite came together awfully quickly...
 

Lachlan Young

Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2005
Messages
4,943
Location
Glasgow
Format
Multi Format
I believe it has been reported that the Super 8 camera was not at CES. Only the bitcoin mining machines.

Really??? It's been turning up in various social media postings over the last few days & perhaps the reason it wasn't appearing all the time on the show floor was because the sales reps were out showing it off to various groups - for example: https://www.instagram.com/p/Bd6ndQeh0Tl/ - there are several other similar posts on different accounts from that event alone.
 

RattyMouse

Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
6,045
Location
Ann Arbor, Mi
Format
Multi Format
Yes, and did you notice that the mining machines didn't even have proper Kodak logos on them? The deal with Spotlite came together awfully quickly...

Yes, that was not a long term plan. From what I read, it went from idea, to press release in only a few months. Hardly any time for people to consider the ramifications about such an obvious scam. Probably why someone messed up the logo to.
 

Chan Tran

Subscriber
Joined
May 10, 2006
Messages
6,816
Location
Sachse, TX
Format
35mm
I have a question though. Would the new Super 8 cartridge fit standard Super 8 camera? I would much rather shoot using an old but high quality Super 8 camera.
 

Cholentpot

Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2015
Messages
6,743
Format
35mm
For those complaining about the high price.

Consumer cameras even the pro stuff is a joke price wise. Check out the price of broadcast cameras and lenses, motion picture cameras? We're not talking 10k, we're talking 100k and up. 2k for a camera is peanuts. I think Kodak is aiming at Hollywood types that want to incorporate Sup8mm footage into cinema films. If the budget of the movie is already 50 million throwing a handful of Sup8 cameras and a few thousand feet of film in won't even cause a blip.
 

faberryman

Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2016
Messages
6,048
Location
Wherever
Format
Multi Format
When introduced, Kodak said the camera was going to cost $400-$700. Kodak now says it will cost from $2500-$3000, which means $2995, so $2000 is out the window. The market for a $400-$700 camera is different than for a $2500-$3000 camera, hence the marketing shift. I don't know whether and to whom it will sell at that price, but it does seem to indicate that initially they had no idea what they were doing.
 
Last edited:

guangong

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2009
Messages
3,589
Format
Medium Format
As for vinyl, is it only hipsters who listen to vinyl, or am I a hipster? A large part of my music collection is made up of LPs, especially jazz and opera.I listen to CDs for convenience at home and in the car, but there is a lot of music among my records that have never made it to CD, or at least not to a readily available label. Also, as with film after digital age, a huge amount of music became available at prices that I could afford, since some people were dumping their record collections for next to nothing to get hip with the latest technology. For example, whole operas consisting of 6 or 8 disks for $5. And early music on CD was hyped to unnatural levels, just like hi-fi when it was first introduced. Quality turntables are still manufactured (too bad the same can not be said of cameras).
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,359
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
You get both a digital file and your film back.




Be still my foolish heart! If I wanted both I would have spent $60,000US for a Hasselblad digital back. Instead I have had to do with taking month long trips to France and Greece as we as long visits to Canada and Hawaii. Woe is me!
 

Ces1um

Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2015
Messages
1,410
Location
Nova Scotia, Canada
Format
Multi Format
Be still my foolish heart! If I wanted both I would have spent $60,000US for a Hasselblad digital back. Instead I have had to do with taking month long trips to France and Greece as we as long visits to Canada and Hawaii. Woe is me!
Well try and soldier on. Our thoughts are with you. :smile:
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,359
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Be still my foolish heart! If I wanted both I would have spent $60,000US for a Hasselblad digital back. Instead I have had to do with taking month long trips to France and Greece as we as long visits to Canada and Hawaii. Woe is me!

Well try and soldier on. Our thoughts are with you. :smile:

It is a tough life, but someone has to live it.
 

Theo Sulphate

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
6,489
Location
Gig Harbor
Format
Multi Format
I have a question though. Would the new Super 8 cartridge fit standard Super 8 camera? I would much rather shoot using an old but high quality Super 8 camera.

I would like to know the answer to this as well.
 

Prof_Pixel

Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2012
Messages
1,917
Location
Penfield, NY
Format
35mm
The new Super 8 Camera isn’t aimed at the users of this Forum. Google ‘university student film competition’ to get an idea of the worldwide activity at the university level creating films. This seems to be the market it is aimed at.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,359
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Be still my foolish heart! If I wanted both I would have spent $60,000US for a Hasselblad digital back. Instead I have had to do with taking month long trips to France and Greece as we as long visits to Canada and Hawaii. Woe is me!

Well try and soldier on. Our thoughts are with you. :smile:

It is a tough life, but someone has to live it.

You're an inspiration to us all.

I am a humble man. Sometimes when I am being humble, leaves a taste in my mouth. But then rinsing my mouth with mouthwash gets rid of the foul smell.
 

faberryman

Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2016
Messages
6,048
Location
Wherever
Format
Multi Format
The new Super 8 Camera isn’t aimed at the users of this Forum. Google ‘university student film competition’ to get an idea of the worldwide activity at the university level creating films. This seems to be the market it is aimed at.
This year's $2500-$3000 camera or 2016's $400-$700 camera? Has the market changed since it was originally introduced.
 

Prof_Pixel

Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2012
Messages
1,917
Location
Penfield, NY
Format
35mm
This year's $2500-$3000 camera or 2016's $400-$700 camera? Has the market changed since it was originally introduced.
To get students started using film (instead of the video devices they have grown up with), the quality and features are of most importance. A cheap camera that lacks the needed quality and features would be worthless.
 

faberryman

Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2016
Messages
6,048
Location
Wherever
Format
Multi Format
To get students started using film (instead of the video devices they have grown up with), the quality and features are of most importance. A cheap camera that lacks the needed quality and features would be worthless.
As far as I can tell it's the same camera they are selling; they just didn't have a clue how much it would actually cost when they introduced it.
 

Prof_Pixel

Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2012
Messages
1,917
Location
Penfield, NY
Format
35mm
As far as I can tell it's the same camera they are selling; they just didn't have a clue how much it would actually cost when they introduced it.
Read the blog. Among other things, they have found the camera needs an improved film transport mechanism. There are other changes as well. It's not the old Kodak that I retired from 25 years ago, that was loaded with experts. They are having to learn as they go. Give them a chance.
 

faberryman

Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2016
Messages
6,048
Location
Wherever
Format
Multi Format
Read the blog. Among other things, they have found the camera needs an improved film transport mechanism. There are other changes as well. It's not the old Kodak that I retired from 25 years ago, that was loaded with experts. They are having to learn as they go. Give them a chance.
I've read the blog. I understand they have to reinvent the wheel.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom