One last thing to check- the hinge pins. Are both pins on each side seating, sliding to the outer edge? Sometimes a pin will not seat. This could leave the back canted slightly (very slightly). The back is actually part of the spool positioning, as you can see by the small wear marks from the edge of the spools. So maybe the back wasn't quite seated, and maybe this would let the spool wobble a bit and spread some uneven tension into the film?
Pure speculation.
My Medalist II looks very different on the supply side from yours. Is it remotely possible that you are missing one roller?
135 is narrower, which makes a difference in this regard. The base is generally also slightly thicker.If your idea that the uneven tension would just naturally pull a ripple in the center of the film was correct, then wouldn't all 35mm cameras do the same thing?
135 is narrower, which makes a difference in this regard. The base is generally also slightly thicker.
Unless it’s a part that’s easily broken or lost, I’m fairly certain it’s a design change...
I don't know what you're talking about. Wasn't I clear that that the specific long-roll film we were using WAS 35mm perforated film??
Yes, that's what the teeth do here too. Though it still poses the question as to why it's causing an issue here, and hasn't in the past. I think I'm going to check dimensions on the width of both the film and backing paper of this roll of Kentmere 200 in comparison to prior Ilford and Kodak rolls and see if there's any discrepancy.
I think you should shoot another roll. Check the Kentmere film to other emulsions, and run another roll of an emulsion that has not had problems. Most likely it was a re-spooling problem.I'm not in doubt it most likely had to do something with my re-spooling of the film, it's just a matter of determining what exactly and how to avoid it in the future.
Uh.. yeah, that's a noYou could in theory run it under these, as below, but that seems like it would distort the film more than anything, so I assume this is wrong. View attachment 401107
The mechanism you offered based on your experience seemed to fit and I expanded on that thought. I don't really see the need for your aggressive response, to be honest.
But then there's this:I haven't read the whole thread, but I too have tended to subscribe to the prevailing reasoning of the film "popping" out of flatness. But there is another possibility I'm not sure has been covered. These Kodak Medalists are very old now and have changed hands to new owners quite a few times. I submit the possibility that some unskilled hands may at one time disassembled the lens assembly and turned a lens element around backwards. The complaint certainly fits this explanation. I've seen it before, although not in this camera.
So probably not a case of flipped/swapped lens elements.[...] my (up to this point highly reliable) Kodak Medalist.
[...] frames 3, 4 and 5 had unusual and inconsistent out of focus regions towards the center of the frame. The other frames on the roll were tack sharp [...]
@Hunter_Compton:
Is spacing between frames even throughout the roll, or does spacing differ around the problematic frames?
EDIT:
Also, do the teeth of the frame-counter-roller leave markings on the emulsion? If so check markings for variations on the problematic frames.
Frame counter produces very even frame spacing. I'd include a photo but I've already cut the negatives.
And yes, the teeth on the roller leave a row of small indentations along the sides of the film outside the image area. I can see no difference between those in the problem area, and those not. Seems very even and regular.
Now that I took the time to read the entire thread, the complaint was a happy camera owner till he used Kentmere film. Without actually having the camera in my hands, I'm afraid I'm at a loss to offer a constructive suggestion. The only common denominator is the brand of film. If it were as simple as that, the solution would be obvious. Use Kodak film only, and be very attentive to the quality of the hand respooling to 620. After several rolls with no problems, the cause was located. This problem should not be happening. Yet it is happening. The reason may never be known, at least to absolute satisfaction. Sometimes things work out that way. Not very constructive of a post I'll admit.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?