Not as warm as Gold, or different grain structure? How would you compare it with ColorPlus?
Isn't Kodacolor 200 just ColorPlus, or at best a derivative of it? I believe the cannisters for ColorPlus were even marked as "Kodacolor 200".
Isn't Kodacolor 200 just ColorPlus, or at best a derivative of it? I believe the cannisters for ColorPlus were even marked as "Kodacolor 200".
As far as I can tell, yes. As a long-time lover of Colorplus over Gold, I'm glad to see it back in the hands of Eastman Kodak.
Ive got a roll or two of that lucky film from China, its supposed to be made on a kodacolor formula that Kodak licenced to the company inching or something. Ive got a few photos ive taken on it, might be a good comparison to shoot a roll of this side by side to see if it has any resemblance to this modern kodacolor.
I love Gold in 120 on older folding cameras with lenses probably designed more with B&W in mind.
Absolutely. All of this can only be good for film photography.
Would be curious to see! The test shots I've seen of Lucky look more comparable to NC500 or Phoenix II but I don't think many people have compared it to Kodak yet, in a like-to-like manner.
I shot a comparison of Kodak (Alaris) Pro Image, and Kodak (Eastman) Kodacolor 100 today. Grey Card and Macbeth charts, same camera, lens, in daylight. Processed in the same tank, printed together on some of the Endura I do most of my work prints and testing on.
Based on my results, I think they're different.
It's not a popular film here and it doesn't really have any advantage over existing Kodak products.
I think the colors in ProImage are better than their other budget offerings. It's like Portra, but with more grain. I wanted to shoot some the other day, turns out I had finished the 10 pack. Well, Blue Moon had a sale on Portra 160, so no big deal.
The main thing that keeps me away from the other budget Kodak films is I can't abide by their color rendering.
Regarding ProImage disappearing from Alaris' homepage, my take is that it means they're no longer going to distribute it in the States.
This isn't particularly strange as ProImage was meant for hot and humid climate stability, and only recently started to be sold in NA. It's not a popular film here and it doesn't really have any advantage over existing Kodak products.
I shot a comparison of Kodak (Alaris) Pro Image, and Kodak (Eastman) Kodacolor 100 today. Grey Card and Macbeth charts, same camera, lens, in daylight. Processed in the same tank, printed together on some of the Endura I do most of my work prints and testing on.
Based on my results, I think they're different.
ProImage was meant for hot and humid climate stability, and only recently started to be sold in NA.
Is it budget?
I also came to that conclusion in the videos I posted a month ago. No one seemed to care much though. Would you say that Kodacolor 100 is Lomo 100 (Kodak VR Plus 100)? This is what I was thinking by the end of my testing, but wasnt 100 percent sure.I shot a comparison of Kodak (Alaris) Pro Image, and Kodak (Eastman) Kodacolor 100 today. Grey Card and Macbeth charts, same camera, lens, in daylight. Processed in the same tank, printed together on some of the Endura I do most of my work prints and testing on.
Based on my results, I think they're different.
I also came to that conclusion in the videos I posted a month ago. No one seemed to care much though. Would you say that Kodacolor 100 is Lomo 100 (Kodak VR Plus 100)? This is what I was thinking by the end of my testing, but wasnt 100 percent sure.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?