Kodak Alaris discontinues BW400CN film

Curved Wall

A
Curved Wall

  • 3
  • 0
  • 60
Crossing beams

A
Crossing beams

  • 9
  • 1
  • 79
Shadow 2

A
Shadow 2

  • 3
  • 0
  • 57
Shadow 1

A
Shadow 1

  • 3
  • 0
  • 55
Darkroom c1972

A
Darkroom c1972

  • 3
  • 2
  • 102

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,837
Messages
2,781,622
Members
99,722
Latest member
Backfocus
Recent bookmarks
0
Joined
Mar 18, 2005
Messages
4,942
Location
Monroe, WA, USA
Format
Multi Format
I *highly* doubt that, both Tmax films are in a solid class by them selves, I suspect they would be among the very last to go.

And if EK/KA would just issue their loyal customer base a little bit of forward-looking product guidance for their remaining film lines, then you (and everyone else) wouldn't be forced into "suspecting" anything. You wouldn't have to. You would know. We would know. Everyone would know. And this thread would not end up in another ugly death spiral of "Kodak bashing" like so many others before it.

Did you notice the preemptive Harman XP2 product guidance thread? The one announcing the Harman press release on the subject. Do you now hear any unwarranted suspicions being voiced here regarding the future of that product?

Not trying to pick on you, Dan. Really I'm not. It's just that the obvious is sometimes just so damned... umm, obvious.

Ken

[Edit: Dan, take a look down the page here at post #105. That's exactly what happens within the vacuum created by a lack of credible product guidance...]
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Prof_Pixel

Member
Joined
Feb 17, 2012
Messages
1,917
Location
Penfield, NY
Format
35mm
And if EK/KA would just issue their loyal customer base a little bit of forward-looking product guidance for their remaining film lines, then you (and everyone else) wouldn't be forced into "suspecting" anything. You wouldn't have to. You would know. We would know. Everyone would know.

My best guess is that at this time, KA doesn't have any firm product plans and are at present, 'shooting from the hip'. Their one goal is, and must be, to figure out a strategy that will make money. If they are discontinuing a product like BW400CN it's because the projected sales of the product won't cover the manufacturing cost they must pay Kodak and the associated distribution costs.

I know some here probably think the only reason they are doing this is to 'wind up' RM. :wink:
 
Joined
Jul 20, 2008
Messages
517
Location
Maastricht
Format
Multi Format
I have still 30 odd rolls left in 120 format. Not been cooled or anything. I wanted it to use as testfilm but I never bothered. Wanna have it?

Without track and trace shipping will be around €18,00. That would be around $25,00? I have 3 cartons with 4 propacks in it. Exp date 2010. Interested?
 

jerrybro

Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2005
Messages
395
Location
Philippines
Format
Large Format Pan
with Ilford's committment to XP2,there is no need for this film.if it goes,others may live longer.:wink:

I have always used Kodak products. Never really tried any other suppliers because the yellow box was always there. Well, that was then and this is now. Since I'm looking at recalibrating my process maybe it is finally time to leave, and venture into something that might be as committed to me as I am to it. At this rate I'd have to do it eventually anyway.
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2005
Messages
4,942
Location
Monroe, WA, USA
Format
Multi Format
My best guess is that at this time, KA doesn't have any firm product plans and are at present, 'shooting from the hip'. Their one goal is, and must be, to figure out a strategy that will make money.

"Shooting from the hip" sure doesn't inspire future product availability confidence, although I strongly suspect you are correct.

Ken
 

Pioneer

Member
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
3,879
Location
Elko, Nevada
Format
Multi Format
My best guess is that at this time, KA doesn't have any firm product plans and are at present, 'shooting from the hip'. Their one goal is, and must be, to figure out a strategy that will make money. If they are discontinuing a product like BW400CN it's because the projected sales of the product won't cover the manufacturing cost they must pay Kodak and the associated distribution costs.

I know some here probably think the only reason they are doing this is to 'wind up' RM. :wink:

We have this in a number of our drugstores as well though I have the feeling that there isn't a lot of it flying off the shelves.

The sad thing is that I know a number of people who still use film, mostly because they haven't migrated to digital yet. But several of them were quite surprised to know that Kodak was even still in business. In my area the majority of film in the stores is Fuji Superia so that is what most of them buy now.
 

markbarendt

Member
Joined
May 18, 2008
Messages
9,422
Location
Beaverton, OR
Format
Multi Format
Without track and trace shipping will be around €18,00. That would be around $25,00? I have 3 cartons with 4 propacks in it. Exp date 2010. Interested?

PM sent
 

markbarendt

Member
Joined
May 18, 2008
Messages
9,422
Location
Beaverton, OR
Format
Multi Format
with Ilford's committment to XP2,there is no need for this film.if it goes,others may live longer.:wink:

Well actually BW400CN is more straightforward to print on RA paper....

XP2 is a great film though and I hope that Ilford can capitalize on Kodak's retreat here.
 

Roger Cole

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
6,069
Location
Atlanta GA
Format
Multi Format
I for one am disappointed. Obviously Ilford will be getting my business here since they are the "last film standing."

I did use this film alongside the traditional b&w films as it provided certain unique advantages. I could shoot at ISO200, 400, 800, and even 1600 on the same roll and still develop it all together. I could develop it in the same batch as all my other color films. I know this isn't critically important to APUGers but it is wonderfully easy to scan, even allowing dust controls.

It didn't take the place of regular black & white, but it is still sad to lose options. But obviously Kodak was right in this case. Not many are sad to see this one go. It looks as if I am one of the few who regularly used it.

As everyone else is also saying, all of that is just as true of XP2 Super, plus it prints easily on regular black and white paper in a regular darkroom as well and it's available in 120 which I don't think the Kodak stuff has been for some time. Just pick up some XP2 and you're good to go for all those same things.
 

PKM-25

Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2004
Messages
1,980
Location
Enroute
Format
Multi Format
Not trying to pick on you, Dan. Really I'm not. It's just that the obvious is sometimes just so damned... umm, obvious.

I don't really give a cr@p about what people say anymore Ken, nothing is "obvious" to me except to make the best imagery I can with the films I love to use. In the case of KA, not only can I still buy what I need and have plenty of stock, I can and will plunk down big bucks to stock up one last time if discontinuation announcements are made. That will give me not months but years to migrate to another film type.

Call me stupid, but I am a much happier photographer this way...
 
Last edited by a moderator:

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,832
Format
Hybrid
KA announcing its first film discontinuation has a huge symbolic significance.


how is this a huge symbolic significance ?
its a film that probably didn't sell well enough to keep making
and they axed it. EK has been doing this since forever .. and it seems like business as usual.
i have no idea why this is so significant and symbolic? significant that they are paying attention to film sales and getting rid of things
that don't make enough profit? doesn't seem significant or symbolic to me ... just good business sense ..
 

RattyMouse

Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
6,045
Location
Ann Arbor, Mi
Format
Multi Format
how is this a huge symbolic significance ?
its a film that probably didn't sell well enough to keep making
and they axed it. EK has been doing this since forever .. and it seems like business as usual.
i have no idea why this is so significant and symbolic? significant that they are paying attention to film sales and getting rid of things
that don't make enough profit? doesn't seem significant or symbolic to me ... just good business sense ..

You nailed the significance right there. Kodak Alaris took over film sales and *nothing changed*. Film sales continued to decline even with an "owner" that is ostensibly interested in maintaining or improving film sales (unlike Eastman Kodak which declared film a non core business).

Even with that improvement, Kodak Alaris' sales dwindled to the point that a film died.

There is *no reason* why BW400CN had to die. Ilford's XP2 shows that a C41 monochrome film *can survive* in today's film market.

Kodak Alaris' ownership of film has not stopped the bleeding.
 

Roger Cole

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
6,069
Location
Atlanta GA
Format
Multi Format
how is this a huge symbolic significance ?
its a film that probably didn't sell well enough to keep making
and they axed it. EK has been doing this since forever .. and it seems like business as usual.
i have no idea why this is so significant and symbolic? significant that they are paying attention to film sales and getting rid of things
that don't make enough profit? doesn't seem significant or symbolic to me ... just good business sense ..

It isn't.
 

skysh4rk

Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2013
Messages
158
Location
Glasgow, UK
Format
Medium Format
You nailed the significance right there. Kodak Alaris took over film sales and *nothing changed*. Film sales continued to decline even with an "owner" that is ostensibly interested in maintaining or improving film sales (unlike Eastman Kodak which declared film a non core business).

Even with that improvement, Kodak Alaris' sales dwindled to the point that a film died.

There is *no reason* why BW400CN had to die. Ilford's XP2 shows that a C41 monochrome film *can survive* in today's film market.

Kodak Alaris' ownership of film has not stopped the bleeding.

The writing was on the wall for this film long before Kodak Alaris ever existed as Kodak itself had already discontinued the film in 120 format, so I don't think the discontinuation of the 135 variety says very much about anything at this point.

As a 120 shooter, I'll happily continue using Fuji 400CN as my main C41 B&W with a bit of occasional XP2 use thrown in. Business as usual for me.
 

RattyMouse

Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
6,045
Location
Ann Arbor, Mi
Format
Multi Format
The writing was on the wall for this film long before Kodak Alaris ever existed as Kodak itself had already discontinued the film in 120 format, so I don't think the discontinuation of the 135 variety says very much about anything at this point.

As a 120 shooter, I'll happily continue using Fuji 400CN as my main C41 B&W with a bit of occasional XP2 use thrown in. Business as usual for me.

I am making the connection in performance (sales) between Eastman and Alaris. I am not blaming Alaris for the death of this film, other than that their efforts to save this film (if there were any, who can tell?) had exactly the same affect that Eastman's did.

Again, this film did NOT have to die. Ilford proves this every day.

Kodak failed, again, to find a market for their world class (and I mean this seriously; every account says this was a great product) film.
 

Xmas

Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
6,398
Location
UK
Format
35mm RF
You nailed the significance right there. Kodak Alaris took over film sales and *nothing changed*. Film sales continued to decline even with an "owner" that is ostensibly interested in maintaining or improving film sales (unlike Eastman Kodak which declared film a non core business).

Even with that improvement, Kodak Alaris' sales dwindled to the point that a film died.

There is *no reason* why BW400CN had to die. Ilford's XP2 shows that a C41 monochrome film *can survive* in today's film market.

Kodak Alaris' ownership of film has not stopped the bleeding.


EKs coater can only make several foot ball pitches of film at a time it is a 'cine' machine.
EK closed their lower volume machines down in 2005.
Ilfords coater may be smaller than the Kodak lower volume machines were.
But you can expect lower volume films and paper to die in future. If we don't buy enough it will dissappear.
Now the 'we' in this is not us APUG members but a wider populace who use film which is shrinking still.
EK have a history of goofs.
 

Jaf-Photo

Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
495
Format
Medium Format
how is this a huge symbolic significance ?
its a film that probably didn't sell well enough to keep making
and they axed it. EK has been doing this since forever .. and it seems like business as usual.
i have no idea why this is so significant and symbolic? significant that they are paying attention to film sales and getting rid of things
that don't make enough profit? doesn't seem significant or symbolic to me ... just good business sense ..

To me it's obvious why it is of huge symbolic significance.

(1) Film is not safe in the hands of Kodak Alaris.

(2) Kodak Alaris makes no effort to promote their films before cancelling them.

(3) The cancelled film BW400CN was key to the recruitment of new film users.

(4) The loss of competing products is harmful to consumers in the long run.

Even if CN films are not that interesting to most apug users, they are hugely important to new film users. They make it possible for any kid to buy film locally, have it processed locally and to get usable scans with no effort.

Someone called CN film a gateway drug to film photography, and I agree with that in the best possible sense.
 

darkosaric

Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2008
Messages
4,568
Location
Hamburg, DE
Format
Multi Format
Again, this film did NOT have to die. Ilford proves this every day.

Kodak failed, again, to find a market for their world class (and I mean this seriously; every account says this was a great product) film.


+1

Not only Ilford, when I see that impossible project is selling films at price of 20€ for 8 pictures - and they are running out of stock often, so selling faster then producing new - this means only that Kodak is not competent. Let this Kodak dies already so that we can be over with, and concentrate on healthier and more intelligent companies.
 

Roger Cole

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
6,069
Location
Atlanta GA
Format
Multi Format
+1

Not only Ilford, when I see that impossible project is selling films at price of 20€ for 8 pictures - and they are running out of stock often, so selling faster then producing new - this means only that Kodak is not competent. Let this Kodak dies already so that we can be over with, and concentrate on healthier and more intelligent companies.

It doesn't prove a thing. Impossible film is a niche product made in tiny quantities for a tiny market so it has to sell for a high price and they can get it. Very, very different from 35mm and 120 or even conventional sheet film.

Sheesh, this is a film that was barely used, not widely liked, and that many people did not even realize was still made, for a market that pretty much died when the minilabs did.

I'd be more worried about KA if they DIDN'T discontinue this film. It would indicate something akin to, if not insanity, at least lack of any business intelligence whatsoever.
 

darkosaric

Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2008
Messages
4,568
Location
Hamburg, DE
Format
Multi Format
It doesn't prove a thing. Impossible film is a niche product made in tiny quantities for a tiny market so it has to sell for a high price and they can get it. Very, very different from 35mm and 120 or even conventional sheet film.

Sheesh, this is a film that was barely used, not widely liked, and that many people did not even realize was still made, for a market that pretty much died when the minilabs did.

I'd be more worried about KA if they DIDN'T discontinue this film. It would indicate something akin to, if not insanity, at least lack of any business intelligence whatsoever.

Maybe, but lets look at another example: lomography - they are selling 35mm and 120 films and new cameras, and they are standing very good in the big market.
I think that Kodak could do better sales (and not discontinue the films) if they try harder, and adopt more to market. But more probable way will be slow agony, bankruptcy and total shutdown of all films soon.
 

pdeeh

Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
4,765
Location
UK
Format
Multi Format
Well it's finally happened: Film v. Digital threads have been superseded by a new technology: Film v. Kodak Alaris ...
 

Xmas

Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
6,398
Location
UK
Format
35mm RF
To me it's obvious why it is of huge symbolic significance.
... snip...

Someone called CN film a gateway drug to film photography, and I agree with that in the best possible sense.

Hi Jaf-

I have altered your text

I normally carry a chromogenic mono in gbag just in case I need to do available darkness I don't mind the ISO 1600 signature.

But I have given them away to NOOBYs who have just bought a film camera of a street seller.

Normally you need to get (show) them (how) to load the film and close the door, ...

And download the free manual to smart phone and read it in coffee shop before they shoot any shots, the camera is typically a OM1n or K1000!

And tell them where a Minilab is...

People are magpies they buy shiny bright things...
 

Jaf-Photo

Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
495
Format
Medium Format
By the way, did you see that Kodak has launched a new micro 4/3 mirrorless digital camera?

It has average specs and competes against the established giants, Olympus and Panasonic.

I think it speaks volumes that Kodak is hitting the digital market with too little too late, while they are mishandling their films.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom