Kodak Alaris discontinues BW400CN film

Frank Dean,  Blacksmith

A
Frank Dean, Blacksmith

  • 6
  • 3
  • 51
Woman wearing shades.

Woman wearing shades.

  • 0
  • 1
  • 58
Curved Wall

A
Curved Wall

  • 6
  • 0
  • 84
Crossing beams

A
Crossing beams

  • 9
  • 1
  • 106
Shadow 2

A
Shadow 2

  • 5
  • 1
  • 78

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,842
Messages
2,781,705
Members
99,725
Latest member
saint_otrott
Recent bookmarks
0

RattyMouse

Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
6,045
Location
Ann Arbor, Mi
Format
Multi Format
It's sad to see a film discontinued, even if it's one I don't use. I think I have a different view on things, though.
Fuji and Kodak cannot scale easily. Each, in my opinion, is stronger in different areas (not saying either is bad in other areas). It seems they are striking a balance, and hopefully will not compete certain things out of existence as the market shrinks.
Fortunately Ilford is in a good position with their offerings.

With the exception of movie film, I think the film market shrinkage has reached its nadir. Consumers have transitioned over to digital, completely. Those who shoot film are those who don't want to shoot digitally. They could if they wanted to, they just don't. Whom does anyone know who shooots film and is ready to transition over to digital? No one. That ship has sailed. Many times over.

So film now exists for the faithful. Once the movie film segment has collapsed, then it will be complete. Fujifilm's movie film sales ceased a few years ago. They now exist on only consumer films. We will have to see what film Fuji discontinues next for any clue as to how right sized they may or may not be. The loss of 400X was a huge blow, as that leaves a gaping hole in their E-6 line. One would have hoped that such an opening would not have been created.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,946
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
I wonder if this is a sign that Kodak Alaris is going to focus its film energies in a different manner.

I would guess that BW400CN was primarily sold through outlets like grocery stores, drug stores and other mainstream retail outlets. Until very recently, a lot of film was sold through outlets like that, even if most of it was colour film.

The sorts of places one would rarely find Ilford films (just to use one interesting example).

If Kodak Alaris has decided to market its film products in a different way, maybe this is a sign of the change.

Maybe we will see more C41 develop-able black and white films - in larger sizes.
 

TheFlyingCamera

Membership Council
Advertiser
Joined
May 24, 2005
Messages
11,546
Location
Washington DC
Format
Multi Format
I really don't think the latitude from C-41 is going to make a huge difference considering that even traditional non-chromogenic b/w films have more latitude than most printing papers can record (with the possible exception of say platinum or albumen). And the orange mask in BW400CN really made for some printing challenges- I typically printed it at grade 3- 3.5 when enlarging it on silver paper, and exposures ran to the 60+ second range at f8 instead of 15-30 @ f11 for regular b/w films. And it would be useless for alt-process printing because of the orange mask.
 

Roger Cole

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
6,069
Location
Atlanta GA
Format
Multi Format
This film may have been in the public eye in Europe, but the only film I ever see locally is Fuji consumer color neg, occasionally Kodak Gold, and Kodak disposable cameras loaded with color neg, presumably that same Kodak Gold. I haven't seen a roll of black and white, conventional or chromogenic, in a store other than a camera store in DECADES. Even in the 90s I had people express surprise to me that black and white film still existed.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,946
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
This film may have been in the public eye in Europe, but the only film I ever see locally is Fuji consumer color neg, occasionally Kodak Gold, and Kodak disposable cameras loaded with color neg, presumably that same Kodak Gold. I haven't seen a roll of black and white, conventional or chromogenic, in a store other than a camera store in DECADES. Even in the 90s I had people express surprise to me that black and white film still existed.

I see it in quite a few grocery and drug stores around here (Vancouver, BC Canada).
 

lxdude

Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2009
Messages
7,094
Location
Redlands, So
Format
Multi Format
I see it in quite a few grocery and drug stores around here (Vancouver, BC Canada).

It is in the local CVS stores, and I saw it in a Walgreen's in NorCal a few years back.
 

lxdude

Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2009
Messages
7,094
Location
Redlands, So
Format
Multi Format
I have to admit here and now that the discontinuance of BW400CN is all my fault- I used it for the first time two weeks ago.

Maybe if I go digital everyone else will return to film...
 

Roger Cole

Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2011
Messages
6,069
Location
Atlanta GA
Format
Multi Format
I have to admit here and now that the discontinuance of BW400CN is all my fault- I used it for the first time two weeks ago.

Maybe if I go digital everyone else will return to film...

By all that's holy, please please do NOT use any more films you haven't already used before! Particularly, if you haven't already, Tri-X, TMY-2, ANYTHING by Ilford, any Kodak color neg or any of the few remaining E6 emulsions!

:D
 

IloveTLRs

Member
Joined
May 22, 2007
Messages
1,132
Location
Boston
Format
Sub 35mm
I shot this film a few times, but ironically I didn't think much of it until I developed it in Rodinal. I never tried printing it. It's a shame to see any film discontinued.
 

Attachments

  • 14046139034_c26e3ae26e_z.jpg
    14046139034_c26e3ae26e_z.jpg
    127.4 KB · Views: 116

RattyMouse

Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
6,045
Location
Ann Arbor, Mi
Format
Multi Format
The title of this thread is misleading. Eastman Kodak discontinued this film, not Alaris. Kodak Alaris is at the mercy of Eastman.
 
OP
OP
Ricardo Miranda
Joined
Mar 31, 2012
Messages
2,408
Location
London, UK
Format
35mm
The title of this thread is misleading. Eastman Kodak discontinued this film, not Alaris. Kodak Alaris is at the mercy of Eastman.

It is in their discontnuation notice: "...Kodak Alaris is discontinuing KODAK PROFESSIONAL BW400CN Film."
 
OP
OP
Ricardo Miranda
Joined
Mar 31, 2012
Messages
2,408
Location
London, UK
Format
35mm
I'll leave that for others to speculate! :wink:
But, I won't be admired if it were both of them.
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
For all we know Kodak is manufacturing consumer still film by order from Kodak Alaris.
So it is Kodak Alaris to decide which film to market and to order from Kodak.

Of course this does not take away issue of films still sold out of stock and not yet actually manufactured for Kodak Alaris.
And of Kodalk deciding, for what reasons ever, not to manufacture some film/not to offer it to Kodak Alaris.
 

darkosaric

Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2008
Messages
4,568
Location
Hamburg, DE
Format
Multi Format
I have to admit here and now that the discontinuance of BW400CN is all my fault- I used it for the first time two weeks ago.

Maybe if I go digital everyone else will return to film...

Just make sure that you use Kodak films, not Ilford and Adox :smile:.
 

lxdude

Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2009
Messages
7,094
Location
Redlands, So
Format
Multi Format
Maybe I'll just use discontinued films. I'll have to find Ektachrome and Elitechrome, Tech Pan and XX. I wonder if it would be safe to use older versions of current films???
 

miha

Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2007
Messages
2,962
Location
Slovenia
Format
Multi Format
I have printed from 400CN on Ilford Multigrade paper with superb results, grainless, beautiful tonality. Just dial in maximum magenta and the film will practically print itself. Great loss I say...
 

Xmas

Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
6,398
Location
UK
Format
35mm RF
For all we know Kodak is manufacturing consumer still film by order from Kodak Alaris.
So it is Kodak Alaris to decide which film to market and to order from Kodak.

Of course this does not take away issue of films still sold out of stock and not yet actually manufactured for Kodak Alaris.
And of Kodalk deciding, for what reasons ever, not to manufacture some film/not to offer it to Kodak Alaris.

In effect they are and we are ie dependent on each link of the chain the retail brick or web buys at one price and marks up for risk... If we don't buy enough the shop buys less or marks up more...

It is cheaper by a large factor to buy agfa vista and scan and convert to mono. KA greedy...

EK closed down their UK and French coating lines 2005 so they can't coat low volume production economically. EK planned on milking the cow for last % of profit.

EK can coat and freeze a master roll at risk but won't do it twice... film is substantially materials cost with wages and plant maintenance secondary. See previous para.

KA and chain have done well in distribution in UK for BW400CN. But if we did not buy Boots won't order more and that will have rippled up the chain.

So it is our fault we have gone digital

- stamp out DPUG
- st...

Ilford have done better they have HP5+ and XP2+ in Boots (major pharmacy chain).

I don't use any C41 from choice.

We have just closed the penultimate Lomo shop in London and it's mini lab. That makes C41 more difficult cause Lomo was open Sundays. My fault... see previous.
 

markbarendt

Member
Joined
May 18, 2008
Messages
9,422
Location
Beaverton, OR
Format
Multi Format
I have still 30 odd rolls left in 120 format. Not been cooled or anything. I wanted it to use as testfilm but I never bothered. Wanna have it?

I'll take it if the postage isn't to bad. USA 81137
 

Pioneer

Member
Joined
May 29, 2010
Messages
3,879
Location
Elko, Nevada
Format
Multi Format
I for one am disappointed. Obviously Ilford will be getting my business here since they are the "last film standing."

I did use this film alongside the traditional b&w films as it provided certain unique advantages. I could shoot at ISO200, 400, 800, and even 1600 on the same roll and still develop it all together. I could develop it in the same batch as all my other color films. I know this isn't critically important to APUGers but it is wonderfully easy to scan, even allowing dust controls.

It didn't take the place of regular black & white, but it is still sad to lose options. But obviously Kodak was right in this case. Not many are sad to see this one go. It looks as if I am one of the few who regularly used it.
 

Xmas

Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2006
Messages
6,398
Location
UK
Format
35mm RF
I for one am disappointed. Obviously Ilford will be getting my business here since they are the "last film standing."

I did use this film alongside the traditional b&w films as it provided certain unique advantages. I could shoot at ISO200, 400, 800, and even 1600 on the same roll and still develop it all together. I could develop it in the same batch as all my other color films. I know this isn't critically important to APUGers but it is wonderfully easy to scan, even allowing dust controls.

It didn't take the place of regular black & white, but it is still sad to lose options. But obviously Kodak was right in this case. Not many are sad to see this one go. It looks as if I am one of the few who regularly used it.

Not true APUG is only a small part of the film community some one has being during it as it is still stocked in most of our large pharmacy (drug) store chain shops. It is the only Kodak mono they stock.

It was also the only mono film in the duty free at local international airport.

I used it for test shots to get a fast turn around.

EK hiked cine 15% Jan14 and KA seem to have hiked still in Ja resently this will reduce volume ~ further.

I'd imagine TMax 100 is next to fail on volume or maybe Double-X, need to buy some Orwo cine before Kodaks next announcement just in case.

The Ilford XP2 is a good substitute for you - I've used 1600 for XP2+ and it was noisy but I got photos.
 

PKM-25

Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2004
Messages
1,980
Location
Enroute
Format
Multi Format
I'd imagine TMax 100 is next to fail on volume

I *highly* doubt that, both Tmax films are in a solid class by them selves, I suspect they would be among the very last to go.
 

Colin Corneau

Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2007
Messages
2,366
Location
Winnipeg MB Canada
Format
35mm RF
Good riddance...horrible film I could never get good prints out of.

I get that it was designed to work with 1-Hour printers, and maybe for that it was ideal but it was a POS in the darkroom. For C-41 B&W Ilford's XP2 is miles above -- prints better, looks better and seems sharper.

Hopefully this is a sign that their core B&W products -- Tri-X, TMax etc -- can be more secure now.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom