Actually, the 35mm still film cassettes had the following as an integral part of the labeling: "Film Price Includes Processing by Kodak".Actually, it was the colour of the edge printing As far as I have heard... Kodachrome sold without processing was limited to the USA, after Kodak was ordered not to bundle processing. so non included had Kodachrome as black lettering on a colour background and included was coloured lettering (or perhaps that was reversed)
I worked part time in a photo store in the US from 1957-1962 and film edge printing was all important in the way Kodak charged the customer who brought us film purchased outside the US and sent to them for processing.I'm also not sure whether the colour of the edge printing was an infallible clue
Between 1957 and 1962 I was learning to walk, talk and read, so I haven't much experience from then to rely upon.I worked part time in a photo store in the US from 1957-1962 and film edge printing was all important in the way Kodak charged the customer who brought us film purchased outside the US and sent to them for processing.
APUG'rs, stop all this nonsense, this kooky-talk, Kodachrome ain't cummin back !!!
Kodak know more about processing the stuff than we do, im sure they have the know how to make something work.People are (except for PE) really, really underestimating the enormous undertaking it would be to re-establish a Kodachrome processing pipeline.
APUG'rs, stop all this nonsense, this kooky-talk, Kodachrome ain't cummin back !!!
Just like Ektachrome was not supposed to be coming back???
Hey Kodak were the ones who threw out the suggestion, dont blame us!
Lets just wait and see what happens.
Just as an example, the rem jet is needed so that removal before the red (first) re-exposure can proceed. If any other means were to be used, it would not work. That is the nature of the Kodachrome process.
Kodak know more about processing the stuff than we do, im sure they have the know how to make something work.
Heck, it would be pretty easy these days to build a basic processor similar to a K-Lab running on the likes of an arduino to monitor the temperatures etc.
OK, i guess this is because the developer used in E6 or C41 films removes that backing at the same time?My post was less than clear. Rem jet is needed but it must be removed before the red exposure. That's about it.
A typical AH layer or anti static layer would not work here.
PE
People are (except for PE) really, really underestimating the enormous undertaking it would be to re-establish a Kodachrome processing pipeline.
It also provides "slipperyness" (friction reduction) and heat dispersal.What is the purpose of Rem-jet? Just to absorb light from the camera exposure to prevent reflection back into the emulsion?
What is the purpose of Rem-jet? Just to absorb light from the camera exposure to prevent reflection back into the emulsion?
It also provides "slipperyness" (friction reduction) and heat dispersal.
...
It is also an antistatic material.
PE
... is anti-halo back layer...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?