KA: Kodachrome "just not practical to try to replicate in today's market."

Amsterdam protest

A
Amsterdam protest

  • 0
  • 0
  • 20
Service Entrance

A
Service Entrance

  • 1
  • 1
  • 45
Trash and razor wire

A
Trash and razor wire

  • 1
  • 0
  • 34
Bicycles chained

Bicycles chained

  • 0
  • 0
  • 24
Tubas in the Park

A
Tubas in the Park

  • 1
  • 0
  • 30

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,859
Messages
2,765,814
Members
99,488
Latest member
colpe
Recent bookmarks
0

Theo Sulphate

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
6,489
Location
Gig Harbor
Format
Multi Format
... It would be nice if a few reasonably priced processing runs could happen, so that all previously exposed film could be dealt with.

Some people should suffer the consequences of their stupidity or laziness.

An idiot whom I won't name travelled from Los Angeles to Portland in 1977 and used 25 feet of double 8mm Kodachrome II. The plan was to flip the roll over and finish the film within the next few months.

That never happened.

So the film sat in the camera, year after year, decade after decade, even though the images on that film, from that period of time, would be pretty nice to see. When K II was discontinued, the film still remained in the camera. When Dwayne's began the final processing, this film never made that journey.

To this day the film remains in the camera, the roll unflipped, in my Camera Room.
 

trendland

Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2012
Messages
3,398
Format
Medium Format
Some people should suffer the consequences of their stupidity or laziness.

An idiot whom I won't name travelled from Los Angeles to Portland in 1977 and used 25 feet of double 8mm Kodachrome II. The plan was to flip the roll over and finish the film within the next few months.

That never happened.

So the film sat in the camera, year after year, decade after decade, even though the images on that film, from that period of time, would be pretty nice to see. When K II was discontinued, the film still remained in the camera. When Dwayne's began the final processing, this film never made that journey.

To this day the film remains in the camera, the roll unflipped, in my Camera Room.
Yes I also remember well these ugly days as Dwaynes began the final processing.I gave several rolls of Super8 and all other Kodachrome stuff I was able to find to Dwaynes.It was exposed over the last weeks the latest roll was 4month exposed.With the exeption of one Kodachrome 64 (18 years old) - sure this was too much for Kodachrome stability - but I wonder about some colors wich were indeed remaining.with regards
 

trendland

Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2012
Messages
3,398
Format
Medium Format
K-Lab - one of these machines which were much smaller than the normal K-14 processors:
View attachment 198390
Kodachrome (if it ever comes again) would have no need to be an exact clone of its original.Sure there would be a need of little reformulation. The same is to the machines. If we remember K14 lab equipment we have this monsters out of the 50th/60th in remind.Kodak was able to serve this machines only with the help of fine technicians who gave their souls to let them run decade to decade.Todays technology let make it more smart.So thanks for this example.with regards .....PS : I strongly belive :"Everything is still possible"......there is just the need of some simple million USD....." :whistling:
 

E. von Hoegh

Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2011
Messages
6,197
Location
Adirondacks
Format
Multi Format
Some people should suffer the consequences of their stupidity or laziness.

An idiot whom I won't name travelled from Los Angeles to Portland in 1977 and used 25 feet of double 8mm Kodachrome II. The plan was to flip the roll over and finish the film within the next few months.

That never happened.

So the film sat in the camera, year after year, decade after decade, even though the images on that film, from that period of time, would be pretty nice to see. When K II was discontinued, the film still remained in the camera. When Dwayne's began the final processing, this film never made that journey.

To this day the film remains in the camera, the roll unflipped, in my Camera Room.
And I felt bad because one of my Super Rollex backs has a roll of Kodachrome still in it, unexposed.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,199
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
Some people should suffer the consequences of their stupidity or laziness.
Maybe, but it would still be nice if they could be forgiven, and get their film processed.
It might be a bit much to hope for K-12 (Kodachrome II) though.
 

E. von Hoegh

Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2011
Messages
6,197
Location
Adirondacks
Format
Multi Format
Maybe, but it would still be nice if they could be forgiven, and get their film processed.
It might be a bit much to hope for K-12 (Kodachrome II) though.
It was very well known when processing would cease, using film which you know cannot be processed is pretty stupid - more so when it's an "important project".
 

alanrockwood

Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2006
Messages
2,184
Format
Multi Format
I have an unshot roll of kodachrome. I had intended to shoot it and send it to Dwayne's before the final shutdown, but I had temporarily misplaced the roll. Now the unshot roll sits on a shelf of my bookcase, feeling all alone and unfulfilled.
 

alanrockwood

Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2006
Messages
2,184
Format
Multi Format
I believe that the original experimental versions of Kodachrome were developed by a couple of musicians using more or less improvised methods and equipment. Does Kodachrome or Kodachrome equivalent really need a high volume production environment to succeed on a technical level? This question is not asking the second question of whether it could survive in a low volume environment on a financial level, but the second question necessarily comes after the first and not the other way around.
 

twelvetone12

Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2015
Messages
758
Location
Over the Alps
Format
35mm
Man and God were more than "a couple musicians" as they both had University degrees in chemistry, a big grant from Kodak and many years to spend on the project. as a plus they were also professional musicians.
 

railwayman3

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2008
Messages
2,816
Format
35mm
It was very well known when processing would cease, using film which you know cannot be processed is pretty stupid - more so when it's an "important project".

On a par with shooting your daughter's wedding on ancient expired film, then wondering why when the negs were fogged and unprintable. I know someone who did that....but at least, in that case, his daughter put together a nice album printed from her friends pics on their smartphones. !
(I'm not immune from stupidity myself at times.....just found a sealed brick of 20 Kodachrome 64 deep in the freezer. I would have sworn that I'd shot, and had processed, all my Kodachrome back in 2010 and even sold off my spare ones at the time on Ebay, while Dwaynes were still working K-14.)
 

trendland

Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2012
Messages
3,398
Format
Medium Format
It's not coming back. You are delusional if you think there is even a 1% chance Kodakchrome is coming back.


Half a dozen fans of a long dead film won't bring it back.
Never say never! with regards :wink:
 

trendland

Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2012
Messages
3,398
Format
Medium Format
I believe that the original experimental versions of Kodachrome were developed by a couple of musicians using more or less improvised methods and equipment. Does Kodachrome or Kodachrome equivalent really need a high volume production environment to succeed on a technical level? This question is not asking the second question of whether it could survive in a low volume environment on a financial level, but the second question necessarily comes after the first and not the other way around.
Yes you are right. I would guess a new Kodachrome film would more than possible be with highest riscs to a manufacturer. But in case of EK there have been so many totaly wrong decisions in the past that I realy would not care so much about riscs.But from my point the volume of production has to be a much higher one in comparison of Ektachromes calculated demand.As far as we can't know the real demand to Ektachrome today - We just have to wait.But it is a real long way to make Kodachrome alive again - that is absolute true.with regards
 

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,833
Format
Hybrid
It's not coming back. You are delusional if you think there is even a 1% chance Kodakchrome is coming back.

Half a dozen fans of a long dead film won't bring it back.

dang 2 realists in the same thread less than 24 hours apart !! we're on a roll !
 

cmacd123

Member
Joined
May 24, 2007
Messages
4,303
Location
Stittsville, Ontario
Format
35mm
this year I found a roll of KR-135-36P in a used camera I bought. Original buyer did not even get the processing that they paid for. I keep the cassette on top of my computer as a reminder to Carpe Diem.
 

Lionel1972

Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2009
Messages
332
Location
France
Format
Multi Format
Bringing back Kodachrome seems such an impossible task to so many that it is precisely why it would be a smart move for Kodak to do it. The media coverage alone would save millions in advertising and would bring to Kodak old and new costumers around the world to look at Kodak products of all sorts.
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,199
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
I have dozens of rolls of process paid, never exposed Kodachrome. They were given to me a couple of years ago.
 

Photo Engineer

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 19, 2005
Messages
29,018
Location
Rochester, NY
Format
Multi Format
All of you complainers............. Go out and develop them yourselves. After all, Steve Frizzza did it! You can too.

:D

PE
 

trendland

Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2012
Messages
3,398
Format
Medium Format
All of you complainers............. Go out and develop them yourselves. After all, Steve Frizzza did it! You can too.

:D

PE
To me it does not go to have Kodachrome back and pay every price for having it.It is indeed in regard of nearly same characteristics to the original.If our focus seams to be in regard of the color look - there might be no urgent need to reanimate this emulsion (because one should be able to live with other films and their nice colors).But (just from my point) it is this special combination of Kodachrome color look AND enormous resistance against aging.We all may acept that Kodachrome should not be projected so often and - (more important) not so long because of temperatures - therefore.I am not sure if Steve Frizza's method can hold on that promise from original K14 process (true colors for ever)?

for ever = > 50 years :cool:

with regards
 

RattyMouse

Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
6,045
Location
Ann Arbor, Mi
Format
Multi Format
Initiating a Kodachrome revival project would be a Kodak move so stupid it would make many of Kodak management's previous stupid moves over recent decades look positively reasonable, if not ingenious. :smile:

I dont agree with Sal on much, but here he's more than 100% right. Bringing back Kodachrome would be a move so foolish, so irresponsible of Kodak, that it would probably insure the complete destruction of the company.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,216
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
It is more likely that the Egyptians will start building pyramids again with the ancient methods long before Kodachrome will be resurrected from the dead.
 

E. von Hoegh

Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2011
Messages
6,197
Location
Adirondacks
Format
Multi Format
Bigfoot
Planet X
Hollow Earth
Flat Earth
Intelligent Design
Free Energy
Crop Circles
Area 51
Velikofsky
David Eich
Perpetual Motion
Extraterrestrials & their probes
Chem Trails
Return of Kodachrome
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom