Well it's an Nikon F mount AI lens on a nikon FE, which is what it officially supports.Are you sure your lens works with this camera?
I would have to develop a roll of film to find out.
I'm using the split image on the Nikon type K screen.
I'm using a Nikon Series E 50mm 1.8 lens
Note: If you find the mirror is hitting the "foam" at the top and staying slightly tilted, you may just need a Light Seal Replacement kit (the foam bumper is likely sticky and rotted).
Yes. When the split-image rangefinder indicated IN FOCUS, the position of the focusing ring relative to the focus index, was a smidge off of infinity. As in, I was able to turn it further into infinity's direction, making the split image indicate out of focus.
I have tried this on subject distances around 0.1 to 0.5 km away.
If you photograph the subject is it in focus? That's all that really matters.
As long as the film is in focus, I wouldn't concern myself with what the mark on the focusing ring says.
Yes.As long as the film is in focus, I wouldn't concern myself with what the mark on the focusing ring says.
The information of Post #23 makes the problem clear.
“Yes. When the split-image rangefinder indicated IN FOCUS, the position of the focusing ring relative to the focus index, was a smidge off of infinity. As in, I was able to turn it further into infinity's direction, making the split image indicate out of focus.
I have tried this on subject distances around 0.1 to 0.5 km away.”
If this happens at 0.1 km (100 meters), the behavior described is expected. The subject distance is close enough that we can see that the infinity mark on the rotating focus ring is not at the index dot on the lens when the split-image rangefinder indicates best focus.
In my experiment with a 50 mm Nikkor, I found that there was a nearly imperceptible difference between the infinity mark and the index dot when the split-image rangefinder indicated best focus at a measured subject distance of 235 meters.
But at 0.5 km (500 meters) and farther, the difference is undetectably small (though it still exists). Something is wrong.
But what? If this was my equipment, I’d immediately mount another Nikon lens of the same focal length, or a zoom lens that can be set to that focal length and retest.
If the problem persists, the problem is in the camera. If the problem disappears, then the focus of the lens is not properly indexed and the lens needs adjustment.
The suspect lens could also be mounted on another Nikon body to see if the problem persists. If it does, then the lens is the cause of the problem.
I just mounted my 28-80 on the body, and the problem still persists.
What are the implications of this?
I just mounted my 28-80 on the body, and the problem still persists.
What are the implications of this?
There are no implications, it doesn't matter. The only thing that does matter is if the camera focuses accurately at closer distances. Infinity is a long way away, between you and infinity atmospheric haze is going to have more of an impact on whether things look sharp or not than being a couple of feet out in focusuing.
The comments here seem to suggest that this is a problem for it.
I just mounted my 28-80 on the body, and the problem still persists.
What are the implications of this?
market for amateur and home-made autocollimators.
Any links or suggestions please?
Reveni Labs Autocollimator — Reveni Labs
In stock and ready to ship. More Information Here User Manual The Reveni Labs Autocollimator is designed to help you check lenses and cameras for accurate infinity focus, as well as and estimation of lens sharpness. It is designed to be affordable, compact, and easy to use.www.reveni-labs.com
On a typical Nikon film camera, the lens-mount-to-film distance is adjustable, the focus screen distance is adjustable, the mirror angle is adjustable
Are you sure your lens works with this camera?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?