I stand (no pun intended) corrected if 1:100 is normal dilution with 510-pyro. 1:500 would be a rough equivalent to rodinal/HC-110 1:100/1:119 ?
Maybe it's possible to push one or two stop with this, but four ??
Yes it is remarkable or appears to be in everyone's mind but (a) no-one has really come up with a reason for these 4 stops not being possible in which the logic used as to why it isn't 6400 is impeccable , IMO
(b) In my own case I have never seen other pictures taken with HP5+ in similar daylight with which to compare the dog picture
In my early days when photography was new to me( not that many years ago ) I would gleefully shoot every and any b&w film I could lay my hands on. I tried 35mm D3200 and knowing nothing about the real speed of D3200 exposed it at EI 3200 in slightly better daylight than the OP has in his picture and apart from being more grainy when enlarged to beyond an 8x10 print size. The print was fine. Would it have stood one stop more without a shadow problem, probably but I cannot say as I never tried it at 6400.
Of course the film was not D3200 in the OP's case but HP5+ so what's the relevance of my experience? You might argue that there isn't much but on the other hand we know that in tests of HP5+ v D3200 the differences at 3200 do not appear to be great so might HP5+ in daylight cope with one more stop? It would seem possible to me
I suspect the problem in determining what kind of issues that arise with HP5+ at 4 stops more is that there are few comparable examples to examine. By examples I mean pictures taken in similar flat shadowless daylight in HP5+ at 6400
pentaxuser