Hello APUG from FILM Ferrania (PART 2)

A street portrait

A
A street portrait

  • 0
  • 0
  • 61
A street portrait

A
A street portrait

  • 1
  • 0
  • 59
img746.jpg

img746.jpg

  • 4
  • 0
  • 61
No Hall

No Hall

  • 1
  • 2
  • 64
Brentwood Kebab!

A
Brentwood Kebab!

  • 1
  • 1
  • 119

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,791
Messages
2,780,891
Members
99,705
Latest member
Hey_You
Recent bookmarks
0
Status
Not open for further replies.

trendland

Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2012
Messages
3,398
Format
Medium Format
Ok - may be you have had contact with the test runs at Kodak.
If I could only find again this article.:cry:..
If I do remember correct there may be mentioned also some scale dimensons of produced Kodak films to that time
~ 1998 - 2000 ?
But many thanks for reply PE.

with regards

PS : Perhaps you are just not allowed to
talk about ( Kodak secrets ) :smile:....
(never mind this should just only be a little joke : with compliments PE )
 
Joined
Nov 15, 2017
Messages
492
Location
?
Format
Analog
Mr, as I said I don't know weather they are or not producing atomic film. I just translated what an article say. Why don't you just call the Gran Sasso laboratory and ask yourself. The scratches are a notorious defect (feature?) on P30, at least as what I saw on the internet, and that was a joke, anyway. you take things to seriusly. I have some free time, yes. Don't you?

I´m aware that you don´t know whether they produce atomic film or not. I just wanted to put a remark on what you´re doing. Speculating on speculations - if it´s a joke it´s cool, but you don´t seem to take things serious which should be taken serious. And by that your spread misinformation.
And then you complain about your "opinion" not being wanted to hear.

I never seem to have enough free time...
 
Joined
Nov 15, 2017
Messages
492
Location
?
Format
Analog
Actually, I already said thet you were right and I was wrong about it, what more do you want to hear? The money was to save machines from the junkyard, they never intended to produce film with it.

And again you´re either wrong or being sarcastic. First i was talking to jonasfj and second i allready told you that the machines of course were meant to built a factory with.
Aren´t you able to get that or are you taking things that less serious so you´re not able to get the truth?

Just for you:

money--->machines--->factory--->any kind of film including E6 = correct.

money--->E6 = wrong.

money--->machines, but no factory = wrong.

And after you said that i was right, jonasfj said that the money was for color film and you said:
"others would just coll me a liar for saying that, but there you go..."

You are contradicting, Mr. .
 
Last edited:

Berri

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2017
Messages
627
Location
Florence, Italy
Format
Multi Format
And after you said that i was right, jonasfj said that the money was for color film and you said:
You are both right: Money was to buy the machine(your point), but they DID PROMISE E6 film, they even released a data sheet to suggest what type of film we coluld expect(my point)

After this, sorry, my free time is over. I give it a rest as I was suggested, perhaps we should just shake hands and be nice to eachother, each one with is "facts" and "opinions", what do you think?
 

RattyMouse

Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
6,045
Location
Ann Arbor, Mi
Format
Multi Format
This thread should be locked. There's nothing coming from Ferrania in the near future and has become rather toxic thanks to Berri.
 

Berri

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2017
Messages
627
Location
Florence, Italy
Format
Multi Format
This thread should be locked. There's nothing coming from Ferrania in the near future and has become rather toxic thanks to Berri.
I gave my apologies if I contributed to create a not very plesant thread. May we all give it a rest now?
 
Joined
Nov 15, 2017
Messages
492
Location
?
Format
Analog
As Harry hasn´t seen the referee waving the fight off, but still has the ringing of the bell in his ears, he storms out of his corner...

I didn't write the article, did I? I don't spread thing.

Yes you didn´t write the article, but you once claimed the money to have been for color film - and i just wanted to make sure that Ferrania producing atomic film is speculation only, as some seem to take up rumors and speculations very quickly.

I would say:
Money[saying that they will eventually produce E6, if they could buy the machines]->machines->BW film->END

It´s ok till ->BW film, the END luckily isn´t a fact. You may be of the opinion that there isn´t more to come from Ferrania but a B&W-film, but we don´t know jet and they promised to keep working on color several times.
You are both right: Money was to buy the machine(your point), but they DID PROMISE E6 film, they even released a data sheet to suggest what type of film we coluld expect(my point)

After this, sorry, my free time is over. I give it a rest as I was suggested, perhaps we should just shake hands and be nice to eachother, each one with is "facts" and "opinions", what do you think?

Yes they intended to produce a small batch of color film - which regrettfully hasn´t happened jet, but we know why. And they still confirm that they are working on color film as intended, to keep their promise - while P30 was needed anyway to test the coater, drying tunnel and finishing machines and now should help them to have some income.
We may have different opinions, but our facts should be the same, as facts.... well are facts.
And as i said, i am nice as long as my discussion partner sticks to the facts. As you now might notice as you stick to the facts but express your opinion about color film.
Harry 4. Berri 4.
Be sure to tune in for round 7...

Hey, Berri admitted being wrong about what the money was for, so i must have won a round and he must have lost one - this must be like Harry 5, Berri 3, then. I´m taking my fights serious, you know... why is there a guy standing in my boxing ring waving like mad?
 

MattKing

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Apr 24, 2005
Messages
52,900
Location
Delta, BC Canada
Format
Medium Format
I do believe that Harry Callahan has taken his cinematic alter-ego to heart.
And for what it is worth, from someone who is interested in this topic but unwilling to argue about it, all of this is pointless and irritating.
If you want to continue, how about moving this to a "Conversation", which was better described as a series of hopefully private message.
 

jonasfj

Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2013
Messages
198
Format
35mm
Regardless of the discussions and that it seems to be an emotional subject, I would like to return to what we know and what we do not know.

From reading the available information on the Film Ferrania site, I conclude the following (as close to facts as it gets):

1. The P30 alpha was made on the R&D coater (Little Boy). The film base was triacetate that they had in store and slit into mini jumbos. The chemistry was mixed in very small batches and they eventually retrieved an 30 liter tank from storage (it is not clear if this was ever used in production). According to David Bias, all the equipment that was purchased for the Kickstarter money is still in storage and they do not have the funding to install it.

2. The conclusion from the above is that Film Ferrania run out of money and they need to find new financing to continue their efforts. The critical question: How difficult is it to find a financer who see an upside in this project. Unless they do, it would be game over, right?

3. They claim to have a capacity of 3,000 rolls per week in the current setup and they claim(ed) to be in production. Thus they should have produced around 80,000 rolls after finishing the shipments from the first orders. We have not seen any of those or had any information of new problems

4. According to the Italian article, Film Ferrania is now doing R&D and production of film to detect nuclear radiation. I think it is reasonable to believe this is true, since who would make something like that up?

5. There has been no news on the website since Aug 2017

Now an opinion: There is something going on that they are not fully transparent about
 
Last edited:

iandvaag

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 7, 2015
Messages
484
Location
SK, Canada
Format
Multi Format
At the risk of adding more noise to the cacophony, I humbly submit my thoughts for your consideration:

I must say that Film Ferrania has an actually impossible task: if they decide to be transparent and release posts detailing every bit of progress and every setback, people will deride them as counting their chickens before they hatch; not making enough progress; not being "true" to their perception of the kickstarter goals, etc, etc.

If they maintain radio silence until they have a major announcement, they are accused of being aloof and people become a bit paranoid, often assuming the worst. People feel like they are losing their connection with a small company, and the good vibrations start to dissapate. Look at Kodak and Ektachrome - there's been essentially one update to the public and there were threads with people freaking out before the update.

Personally, I feel fortunate to get a look behind the scenes and see all the challenges that Ferrania has faced. I appreciate them "airing their dirty laundry" rather than getting no updates, but I can completely understand why they have cut back a bit on the posts. It's kind of a lose-lose situation for them. Personally, as someone interested in emulsion making I was fascinated to have this inside look into their progress. Can you imagine Fuji posting a photo of a "chiller" that they newly installed? Fuji can't even be bothered to update their US website with their currently available film and photofinishing products.

So let me just give Dave a virtual pat on the back:
Thanks for your time and your clear and honest communication. You have essentially an impossible job, but even so you are doing well.

And just a plea to this thread: have some more patience. Which of the above two options do you want Ferrania's response to be? If the feedback they get is like this thread, do you think that will encourage them to be more transparent, or more reserved? This is an extremely rare opportunity to get insight behind the "silver curtain" of the business of setting up a film factory, and we should take advantage of it, asking them questions and learning alongside them. Who knows, this sort of information could be useful to someone in the future, and if we create a well rounded thread discussing such substantive matters, this could help them out.

Ok, already regret posting, I will return to the cave that I lurk in. I certainly didn't intend to aggravate matters futher.
 
Joined
Nov 15, 2017
Messages
492
Location
?
Format
Analog
I do believe that Harry Callahan has taken his cinematic alter-ego to heart.
And for what it is worth, from someone who is interested in this topic but unwilling to argue about it, all of this is pointless and irritating.
If you want to continue, how about moving this to a "Conversation", which was better described as a series of hopefully private message.

I have no problem moving our conversation to private message; i just wanted to clarify about what the campaign etc. really was about - and as Berri did made some claims in this thread i needed to clarify here. But it seems like Berri is back to the facts, so our conversation appears to be finished.

But as this thread is about Ferrania and some people having questions or something to contribute, i´m moving on to jonasfj.
Regardless of the discussions and that it seems to be an emotional subject, I would like to return to what we know and what we do not know.

From reading the available information on the Film Ferrania site, I conclude the following (as close to facts as it gets):

1. The P30 alpha was made on the R&D coater (Little Boy). The film base was triacetate that they had in store and slit into mini jumbos. The chemistry was mixed in very small batches and they eventually retrieved an 30 liter tank from storage (it is not clear if this was ever used in production). According to David Bias, all the equipment that was purchased for the Kickstarter money is still in storage and they do not have the funding to install it.

2. The conclusion from the above is that Film Ferrania run out of money and they need to find new financing to continue their efforts. The critical question: How difficult is it to find a financer who see an upside in this project. Unless they do, it would be game over, right?

3. They claim to have a capacity of 3,000 rolls per week in the current setup and they claim(ed) to be in production. Thus they should have produced around 80,000 rolls after finishing the shipments from the first orders. We have not seen any of those or had any information of new problems

4. According to the Italian article, Film Ferrania is now doing R&D and production of film to detect nuclear radiation. I think it is reasonable to believe this is true, since who would make something like that up?

5. There has been no news on the website since Aug 2017

Now an opinion: There is something going on that they are not fully transparent about

Regarding...

1. They also lost some money due all the delays they had to face - the initial plan surely was to have some money left to be able to put some machines back into working condition.

2. They don´t really need a new investor to move on as the demand of P30 was insanely high. I think Dave said that they sold volume considered to last for 4 months within 5 day. For easier calculating let´s assume one month has 30 days, so 4x30d.= 120days, 120 days volume sold within 5 days is 120d./5d.= factor 24.
Demand of P30 was factor 24 higher than expected and that´s rather a miracle than dumb luck - as the market for B&W is rather saturated than starving.
Even if demand should go down again, let´s say from factor 24 to factor 4 or 3, this still should give them some income and therefore (some) independece from the need of an investor. Therefore i don´t see a game over right now.

3. As they intended to expand capacity by installing a 30 liter tank, it might be possible that they weren´t producing P30 all the time up to now. As a 30 liter tank surely would expand volume of coatable liquid(s), but the question is whether this would harmonize to the capacity of the base material the coater can take up in one run. It could be possible that the coater is able to take up base material needing like 15 liters, but no more than that. Therfore, to have benefit from a 30 liter tank, they had to expand the base-capacity of the coater too - which they planned to do so after the rewards were produced in 2014.
The initial idea was to produce the rewards on the coater being unmodified, then to expand the capacitiy of the coater and move on. Now as the rewards weren´t possible to be made but demand of P30 being 24 higher than expected, they may have decided to expand the base- and liquid-capacity of the coater to be able to meet demand of P30 - and this could mean that they weren´t able to produce P30 all the time up to now, as the coater probably had to stand still during expanding base-capacity. So we can´t be really sure on the 80,000-rolls-number.
The last new problems were said to be in the finishing line.

4. As i don´t speak italian i have to relate to what Berri said and he said that "which is clearly sayng that Ferrania has projected a special nuclear film for the Gran Sasso Laboratory, although It isn't clear wheter it is refering to old Ferrania, or new Ferrania." So we still don´t know whether this was a flashback, to what Ferrania once was producing, or whether this is happening right now. To your question: " since who would make something like that up?" i could ask why some make up that the kickstater-campaign was for color film only. As lot of journalists also take their information from the internet, its well possible that the author did a sloppy research due to having not enough time, found some old information and just added it to his article - as he wanted to be able to say something about Ferrania. To put Ferrania into perspective meaning to say "look, they do/did proffesional stuff, sience and so on". And i think Berri said that this article was from a local newspaper. Now i don´t wanna look down on local newspapers, but it´s not the New York Times having to loose a reputation due to having spread missinformation. And local newspapers usually don´t make that much money, therefore not being able to afford star-reporters - and a quick search on the internet for a small article is so easy and quick...
Therefore one should be carefull what one does belive; but even if you still belive it, we still don´t know if it´s true or not.

5. To be precise there was a kickstarter-update released on sept. 5., i don´t know if you know about it.
Dead Link Removed

About the opinion it must be: There might be something going on they may not be fully transparent about - as we still don´t know whether atomic film is a fact from the past or now.
But even if there was something going on they were not fully transparent about, i don´t think this would be a huge problem. As the money was to save the machines and built a factory with to produce some E6 as rewards, i´m not sure whether Ferrania is bound to tell the backers everything they are doing. As the salvation of the machines was the main goal, they shouldn´t be bound to now tell everything they are doing with those machines. As long as they struggle to stay alive, as they intend to built a succesfull factory, and as long as they keep the backers informed about progess of color film it should be fine.
To put it extreme, i think no one is expecting them to still post updates in 10 years future time, telling the backers that they intent to replace some old windows at their building or that they had to increase their parking lot because cars need bigger parking lots in 10 years future time.

But as there seem to be no news to tell they were quiet since sept. 5. . And as some did complain about timelines not being sticked to, deadlines being withdrawn, they now only "tune in" when something certain can be told. And as some even called them a fraud in the comments on their side, well, they might not be too ambitious any more to again fight some not understanding or not remembering the goal of the campaign.

Which also is why i try to get this thread back to the facts to have a nicer atmosphere again - as it used to be before distrust and pessimism crawled in.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 15, 2017
Messages
492
Location
?
Format
Analog
At the risk of adding more noise to the cacophony, I humbly submit my thoughts for your consideration:

I must say that Film Ferrania has an actually impossible task.....

I think you put out a very nice post, correlating a lot of points i resemble. Being able to participate on that undertaking and to witness them making their way through all the obstacles and putting out P30 - especially being lucky enough to find a formula of P30 matching their coater and finding out that demand of P30 was 24 higher than expected, was just like watching a Hollywood-blockbuster where the hero always receives what he needs to save the day - but Ferrania was and is real! It looks like Ferrania made its own heart beat again by letting someone find this formula within all this amount of records, they surely didn´t had time to revise, AND demand being insanely high just is a miracle for me - and they deserved it, i think.
 

mitorn

Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2016
Messages
36
Location
Carinthia
Format
35mm
So since no one bothered to check the website of the Gran Sasso laboratory:
I skimmed the list of the current experiments and the used detectors and found no potential candidate. https://www.lngs.infn.it/en/current
The last experiment I am aware of which used nuclear emulsions was OPERA. As far as I know the detector was shut down in 2012. http://operaweb.lngs.infn.it/spip.php?rubrique39
However it is still possible that a new experiment will use nuclear emulsions as detectors or that I am wrong and a current experiment is using nuclear emulsions.

... Now i don´t wanna look down on local newspapers, but it´s not the New York Times having to loose a reputation due to having spread missinformation. And local newspapers usually don´t make that much money, therefore not being able to afford star-reporters - and a quick search on the internet for a small article is so easy and quick...
Therefore one should be carefull what one does belive; but even if you still belive it, we still don´t know if it´s true or not....

As for the facts in newspapers and on their websites:
This year, The Guardian cited and linked the satirical Austrian website “Die Tagespresse” concerning our foreign minister Sebastian Kurz on their website:

https://web.archive.org/web/20170517054657/https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/may/17/macron-austrian-minister-sebastian-kurz-french-election
“In 2014, Kurz filed a “right to be forgotten” request to Google, asking for references to the Geilomobil to be removed, signing his application with “xxx hugs & kisses Outside minister Sebi.”

After they found out they edited the article without a note: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...trian-minister-sebastian-kurz-french-election
Citing wrong information can happen to anyone. The question is how you deal with it.
And by the way that was the reaction of the Tagespresse: https://dietagespresse.com/die-wichtigsten-guardian-storys-aller-zeiten/

-martin-
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom