I see its mentioned that the formulas were designed for acetate base, but something that may not have been pointed out, is actually (to my surprise) that most modern films still made today by kodak and fuji are using acetate base.
The only real exception is motion picture films, but also some other stocks like rollei digibase made by agfa that is extremely prone to light piping due to the highly transparent nature of the polyester base.
Also interesting to note is it appears that along the sprocket edge of the last solaris films, was infact the original ferrania logo still imprinted along the frame numbers!
Motion Picture CAMERA films are generally on Acetate, with a few exceptions like IMAX where the polyester base is stronger.
Poly is used for Movie PRINTS for that reason, and a few lab films. Poly does have better long term storage stability (over 100 years storage)
The digibase was on poly as it is really an Aero film, where the film must keep it's dimensions and work in the cold. it has been sold as a still and movie film just because AGFA - Belgium had it available.
I will agree that for the users that Ferrania is aiming at Acetate is the better base.
The one on the edge print of the "Post Imation" Ferrania film was a "new one" based on previous logos. there are a couple of stars to the top of the words.
(there was a url link here which no longer exists)
Yes they are nice colours! (just incase your wondering, i never shot these)Nice colors, NZoomed!
I will never forget the last Ilford factory tour (with Simon Galley as our tour guide; Simon we miss you!),
Best regards,
Henning
Did Ferrania actually introduce any "professional" line of films that were likened to portra/ektar or fujocolor pro?
I know im pretty impressed with what i see with Solaris on Flickr,
A note to the Americans above:
While the American capitalists of 3M owned Ferrania and profited from it, the film was always referred to as Ferrania, because that is the name of the factory.
The same goes for the Harman Technology owners of the Ilford factory.
Hi Dave - Looking forward to receiving my film from the Kickstarter, and it's good to see the team making progress!
I didn't see anything on the official site, but will Ferrania be selling any swag (t-shirts, hats, etc.) with logos? Very neat looking, especially some of the historical branding.
I see its mentioned that the formulas were designed for acetate base, but something that may not have been pointed out, is actually (to my surprise) that most modern films still made today by kodak and fuji are using acetate base.
The only real exception is motion picture films, but also some other stocks like rollei digibase made by agfa that is extremely prone to light piping due to the highly transparent nature of the polyester base.
I guess what im trying to say is when reading the article, it sounds like its an outdated formula from the scotchchrome days, when really its not that outdated at all and acetate film base is on the majority of films made today.
Other thing regarding logo, perhaps we should take a vote?
Also interesting to note is it appears that along the sprocket edge of the last solaris films, was infact the original ferrania logo still imprinted along the frame numbers!
Would be cool to keep these features retained if possible
If you check the Kickstarter updates, you'll see that Dead Link Removed. You do it through your Kickstarter account.I've moved house since the kickstarter, where do I go to change my address and make sure the film goes to me?
Don't want the *rs*h*le who bought my house to get my film as well...
Did Ferrania actually introduce any "professional" line of films that were likened to portra/ektar or fujocolor pro?
I know im pretty impressed with what i see with Solaris on Flickr, but as far as im aware, it was just a consumer level film?
Thanks for the note.Ricardo, Scotch films made in the USA and probably in Italy were based on Ferrania formulas to some extent. I knew many of the engineers from 3M and met a few from Ferrania as well. AFAIK, from their explanation, it was an exchange of technology followed by mutual cooperation.
As for professional films, they are of higher image quality in some cases. BTDT.
PE
Sorry you think that way.It's amazing the condescending tone of some of the members here...
And that's why all film companies had to have a shrinking diet.Our films will be the best we can produce at all times. You can't really call it "pro" because pros only rarely shoot film these days. And you certainly can't call it "consumer" because that market was swallowed by smartphones. I'm generalizing, of course, but this is the reality as we see it.
Yeap, still part of the Commonwealth and in the American continent, unless you paddle it away.Some of us above commenting are Canadian, not American, Ricardo. Canada, that large land mass above USA. Heard of it?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?