Do you think this presumption is not right?
Wine bags.
Yes, I think so.
As to the growlers: if these are the ones with the swing top and a rubber ring to create a seal between a ceramic (or plastic) plug and the bottle: my experiences with this kind of system are poor. It's not very suitable for stuff like developers as the seal isn't all that good, at least not upon reuse and the fact that some chemistry may make the rubber seal brittle or otherwise degrade it. Screw caps, on the other hand, generally work extremely well. The kind that @chuckroast mentioned, the polycone ones, sound particularly nice, but I also have good experiences with plain plastic screw-on caps.
I'm trialing these, but so far, I find them inconvenient to handle. The advantage is that they are very space-efficient, but even with an outer cardboard box (which eliminates part of the space savings argument), it's just a flappy and unwieldy piece of ... stuff... to handle. It's a personal thing.
What about these in the link?
They look great.
Btw, I use these:
View attachment 357106
With a generic white cap:
View attachment 357107
Unit price, consumer retail, is €0.71 for a 150ml size.
No need to make things overly complicated.
I buy Kombucha Brown Growlers because they have good sealing lids and come in a good size. They cost a bit, but are durable and seal quite well.
Might not need the brown color for most chemistry, but it does not hurt.
What about soft drink and sparking water bottles? As I understand it Polyethylene terephthalate is not permeable to air. But with time, how many years for Polyethylene terephthalate bottle to degrade? Not that it is issue for me, I use my brown glass bottles, with all the moves I've made time storage when I was working overseas, then more moves, have not broken or lost any. Currently I'm using Rodinal and HC 110 so I don't have developer to store.
Water bottles and food bottles can cause accidental poisoning of others. When PE [Photo Engineer], who was a retired Kodak engineer who designed and developed film products such as Kodachrome, would post warnings against using soft drink, water bottles and food bottles for darkroom chemistry. Do a website search on PE and the subject for more detailed responses.
I use them. They are not that expensive if you buy a box from a lab equipment supplier. I use wide mouth 1L bottles both for long-term storage (phenidone in propylene glycol) and for my working solutions. They are convenient for quickly dumping the content into the developing tank and most importantly back into the bottle without any funnels. The caps can be purchased separately if lost/damaged.May I ask what are your thoughts on reagent amber glass bottles when storing chemistry for longer term? They are even more expensive than amber glass growlers but do you believe that they provide better chemical resistance than amber glass growlers? Has anyone used them?
Hello,
I want to ask about glass bottles for storing chemistry. Is it very important that glass bottle or beer growler would be amber? Or it doesn't matter for storing chemistry if glass bottle or beer growler is clear? I find amber beer growlers 10 x more expensive than clear ones so maybe anyone who has used clear ones for storing chemistry could share their opinion?
I also found reagent amber bottles which can be used for storing light-sensitive chemistry. As I know photography chemistry is light sensitive, so is it true that simple amber / reagent amber glass bottles are way better for storing chemistry? Or it depends on the place where that bottle will be stored? Lets say that I will store bottle filled with chemistry in complete dark for most of the time and I would only expose it to light for a short time when I need to use chemistry. What are your thoughts about it?
By the way, I wish you merry upcoming Christmas!
So if were to use a 2 liter soda bottle with the label removed, glued on label D76 in my darkroom, locked away under the sink cabinet, I will get up in the middle of the night find the key, open the cabinet, and take a long drink of D76?
Thank you so much. And thanks to everyone else who participated in this topic. I like that we can discuss and share our opinions.
If anyone else want to share their thoughts then I would like to read them too.
Have a nice day!
I find any food containers questionable, because of the possible confusion. Chemistry containers should look like chemistry containers and not like food containers or an accident will happen one day.
To add an extra note of pessimism I don't admit any glass containers to my darkroom: plastics only. Glass tends to be heavy, slippery when wet with water or (worse!) with developer, and a drop and shatter event is always a total spill with chemistry and lots of sharp edges to clean up.
I've contacted Amazon seller who sells glass growlers and asked him what is his opinion about storing photography chemistry in one of these bottles. Also I explained that I'm trying to find the main differences between glass growlers and reagent glass bottles in terms of chemistry resistance. He replied: "I wouldn’t trust them to something as reactive. The lids will most likely be the problem". Later I've noticed that some reagent glass bottles (and plastic bottles) have a plastic protection on the bottle neck which is perfectly visible when the lid is removed. After I've noticed it I made a presumption that this additional plastic material on bottle neck which connects with lid/cap of the bottle might be the reason for better air sealing. Do you think this presumption is not right?
To add an extra note of pessimism I don't admit any glass containers to my darkroom: plastics only. Glass tends to be heavy, slippery when wet with water or (worse!) with developer, and a drop and shatter event is always a total spill with chemistry and lots of sharp edges to clean up.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?