Forte Polywarmtone

Great news and a great work by Mirko and his team ! I look forward to the day when I can have my pre-ordered papers delivered.

Karl-Gustaf

 

I wonder what the lith possibilities will be??

 

"On the big coater rehearsed hands will plug the pipes."

This sounds dangerous. Better be careful with your fingers.

 

There has been a recent update http://www.polywarmtone.com/Blog/English.html

 

I would hope for research purposes they have some prints made on fresh Polywarmtone back when it was still made, and the negatives they were printed from. If not, I'm sure we could help them get it. Although there would be some uncontrollable variables like enlarger and lens, it would probably be better than comparing new PW prints with prints made today on 7 year old paper.

 

One would think so. However, unlike other b/w fb papers, Forte PWT had neither optical brighteners nor incorporated developers. I have a rather large stash of this paper and it prints today the same as it did ten years ago - same exposure times, same emergence time in the developer. There's no change in image tone either.

I can't think of any other paper currently available that does not have these "improvements". When they do, like the ilford FB papers, you'll be lucky to get more than a few years out of stash before it turns.

 

Interesting point you make about the inverse correlation between longevity and the inclusion of optical brighteners and incorporated developers in such papers as Ilford FB.

Can you say what you believe to be the link between lack of longevity and incorporated developers and optical brighteners?

Perhaps Ilford might care to comment on its findings in these respects?

pentaxuser

 

I'm fairly sure Simon Galley has stated the ILFORD papers do not contain incorporated developers.

Tom

 

That's odd because I seem to recall people complaining that PWT tone changed with age. Maybe it stabilized after X amount of time

 

I have never used it, but I would like to try it and if I like it I would add it to my stable.

 

I have several stockpiles of PWT purchased at different times from before and after the discontinuance. I've never witnessed fogging with this paper due to age. Apparently Ilford denies using incorporated developers despite users' discovery to the contrary (revisit this thread... http://www.apug.org/forums/forum37/70895-developer-incorporated-paper.html). As for OBA's, I have no conclusive evidence however there are ample reports online suggesting that they are present in Ilford papers (http://www.ilfordphoto.com/photocommunity/forums/theforum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=5420).

In any event, I know what I know, I see what I see and my old stash of Ilford mg warmtone was corked after a few years in cold storage while the PWT still prints the same with emergence times in the 35-40" range. I haven't noticed any drastic (or even subtle for that matter) change in print color either.

Clearly the inclusion of these extra chemicals in a paper's emulsion causes degradation. Not having a background in photo chemistry, I can't tell you why it happens.

 

One comment - Polywarmtone like most other Warmtone papers gets slightly cooler with age. I still have a raesonable amount left from the last production run.

Ian

 

Thanks for the reply, frotog.

pentaxuser

 

I still have a bunch of PW14. 8-9 years old. Can't get more than grade 3.5 but I've not noticed any change or color and for sure no veiling at all. Not pretty much the same with Agfa papers.

In comparison, Ilford WT has a steady trend to weaken quite quickly on the blue emulsion, 3 year-old paper can't achieve more than grade 3. I'm talking real grades, i.e RN 85.

So basically I concur with frotog's statements.

 

Hi. I'm preparing to get back to my darkroom after a wee while.
Do you think Forte Polywarmtone RC would be of any use after a few years kept in the cool storage? The last time I used it 1-2 years ago it was okay.
I've got lots of FPW-2 left (too much I think).

By the way, I managed to get it printed in sepia, but can't remember how I did it Is this possible it was Bromophen?

 

You can certainly sepia tone it. (Caveat - I've never used it but other WT papers sepia tone nicely as do many neutral papers though the results are rather different. I routinely brown tone Ilford MGWT.) I don't know any paper that produces a real sepia look without additional toning.

 

Salted paper print process does.
This is one of my prints:



Salt printing is an old process technique from 1833, whereby paper is treated with a solution of salt and silver nitrate and then subjected to outdoor exposure (sunlight) or an indoor UV lamp. I used a lamp this time. I love this process for its simplicity and beauty of the prints.

 

Well yes. I should have said - I am aware that some other process give such a result. I meant I didn't know of a regular developing out silver gelatin paper that did so in the usually available developers. I could always be wrong though, of course.

 

You usually are.

 

Well, the thing is that sepia appeared without any other treatment. And no, it's been fixed properly

 

That's really cool, but I've never seen anything THAT warm without toning (other than some alternative processes like above.) If you figure it out let us know!

 

It's been a year since the last blog entry. I'm starting to worry. Almost 7 years older since this journey began too.

 

Hmmm ... I noticed that most of us are getting older. Is there anything we can do about that?

 

Yes, hang out with people who are older than we. That will make us feel young again.