• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

First roll of Harman Phoenix photos up!

I, for one, will be making a purchase for every batch they do. Any new player in the market is a great thing. I'm not too sure if it can be compared to any other efforts during the heights of film production
 
Underwhelming after all the hype, but it's now clear why the marketing was into the fringes. It's not a film that is anywhere close to competing with Fuji or Kodak, but Ilford have to start somewhere.

Ian
 

Many thanks for this post, Henning.
 

Look at logan2z post. ORWO is complete garbage compared to this
 
Some test rolls were processed in a lab I know for one of the photographers Ilford sent samples, it was developed and scanned (Noristu) the same way they do hundreds of C-41 rolls every day. One employee described Phoenix as "horrible".

But, ok, if this is just about funding a color film project I will be there buying a couple of rolls to make Harman feel my love. Same way I did with Orwo and Adox.
 
Last edited:
Do you think anyone would notice if the film was damaged in customs X-ray machines?
 
LeoniD said:
Look at logan2z post. ORWO is complete garbage compared to this
Click to expand...

I've shot enough Orwo NC500 and seen enough of examples of Phoenix now to form my own opinion (of course, I'm still waiting on my own Phoenix shots). But, I'd like to hear you name one area where you consider Phoenix to be better than NC500.
 
Seems like it wasn't too many years ago that there were worries over the end of colour film: too difficult to make, too expensive, not enough demand. The film world worried about a monochrome future, now we've got a new entrant in the market.

All the European manufacturers take this interesting iterative approach of selling R&D outcomes to raise funds and awareness. Something that massive operatives like Fuji and Kodak don't need to do. I think there could develop a bit of keen competition within Euro film firms which will hopefully drive innovation.
 
halfaman said:
…it was … scanned (Noristu) the same way they do hundreds of C-41 rolls every day…
Click to expand...

This may be the issue, my understanding is that the normal C-41 settings aren't optimal due to the lack of a mask. Harman's data sheet includes suggested scanner settings for this reason, do you know if the scanner settings were adjusted?
 
perkeleellinen said:
I think there could develop a bit of keen competition within Euro film firms which will hopefully drive innovation.
Click to expand...

It will be interesting to see how Wolfen NC200 (rumoured to be released in the first half of 2024) compares.
 
Flighter said:
This may be the issue, my understanding is that the normal C-41 settings aren't optimal due to the lack of a mask.
Click to expand...

A few years ago when I had a minilab and we came across a maskless colour film, we simply put a blank/clear piece of Fuji C200 film under the Fuji SP3000 auto carrier and between the light source and the negative.

It worked a treat and very little manual correction was needed.
 
brbo said:
I've shot enough Orwo NC500 and seen enough of examples of Phoenix now to form my own opinion (of course, I'm still waiting on my own Phoenix shots). But, I'd like to hear you name one area where you consider Phoenix to be better than NC500.
Click to expand...

Well, for starters, it has color. I'd love to see your examples of NC500
 
brbo said:
Lets get some perspective.

Color Mission was a miracle. Nobody mistook Orwo NC500 or LomoChrome '92 for a miracle, yet they (at least '92) look to be lightyears ahead of Phoenix at the moment.
Click to expand...

Concerning perspective:
Please don't forget that InovisCoat needed about a whole decade to get to their best CN emulsion. And that despite of having the original Agfa production machinery and a significant part of (but not all of) the former Agfa emulsion know-how.
So that Harman managed to create the Phoenix film in such a short time span is indeed really impressive, and deserves a lot of appreciation and respect.

But concerning future perspective we also should remain realistic:
Harman has started here a Marathon. It will be a very hard Marathon. It will take many, many years to come close(r) to the quality level of the current Kodak and Fujifilm amateur colour negative films. Kodak and Fuji have been multi-billion dollar companies for decades in the film era, with hundreds of million dollars spend on R&D over the decades.
Harman cannot come to the same level in only some years (if at all). Patience and endurance are needed. And the more we support them, the better the chances are for their success in the long term.

Best regards,
Henning
 
Last edited:
foc said:
I wish Harman Phoenix Colour Film the very best of luck.

For what it is worth, here is a comparison.

Harman Phoenix Vs Kodak Gold Vs Lomography CN100
Click to expand...

@foc, this is great, thanks for sharing. Parallel comparisons such as this one will I think be way more useful than a generic youtuber doing a survey on the new film only. That's because those 'one film reviews' are a feast of confounders and make little sense if you're not the reviewer or use exactly the reviewer's workflow.

In the samples you posted above, we can at least factor out a few variables (those listed in the text), understand what is the benchmark being set, and gain an intuition on quality expectations. I would assume the implicit benchmark for this reviewer are those Gold 200 scans, or perhaps those Kodacolor VR scans.

I don't use Lomo/Kodacolor, but those Gold 200 scans in the review above are, on my calibrated Eizo monitor, utter shite. Dogpi$$. CaKa. Myself, a simple amateur who shoots 90% black and white and 10% Gold, Ektar and Ultramax, can obtain from Gold results that are to my taste way better than those. I use a very simple, controlled workflow, which means that, in turn, many people out there will be able to get much better results than my own.

Those Gold scans are so bad, that if I were considering approaching 35mm C41 photography for the first time with Gold 200 as my everyday stock, based on these samples alone, I would instantly desist.

So my point is - we haven't really begun to even scratch the surface on how Harman Phoenix will look in real usage, and that includes when scanning. More relative comparisons with a well performing benchmark will be helpful for this.

So again thanks for posting!
 
Last edited:

+1!
 
George Mann said:
Lomo CN 100 is Kodacolor VR,
Click to expand...

No, if you compare Lomo CN 100 under identical test conditions with Kodak ProImage 100, you will see..........no differences.
Lomo CN 100 was introduced at a time when film sales were still in a significant decline. And at that time ProImage was only offered in some emerging markets, not in the main markets NA, Europe, Japan.
So for economical reasons it was by far the best solution to use ProImage for that deal with Lomography. Trying to bring back a long discontinued film (for which you prabably even don't get all raw materials anymore) would have been much too costly. Would have been a very bad move in a situation with severe financial problems (please don't forget Chapter 11 in 2011 for Kodak; and that in 2014 they were really short before stopping film production entirely).

Best regards,
Henning
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register