That's not true for CL and CLCN, there must be exact measurement (0.1 gr. precision), because they are weaker.
You're right to have fun
So do you ever make your Caffenol with regular coffee brew rather than instant? Robusta beans seem like something you can get much easier in bean or ground form without ending up with a blend. Not sure it matters, but you never know.
Jnantz (John?): Thanks. Appreciate it all. Yes, we can all be snobs about so many things. Even coffee, Caffenol recipes, etc. There's a line between fastidiousness about a getting a regular, repeatable process and obsession, but I'm not sure where we cross it. But often, we do. Like you say, we do have to remember to have fun.
OR you can save cumulative spent FIXER and take a jug of it to the local (hazmat) dump 2 to 4 times a year.
ROK: Yes, wouldn't be nice if the caffeic acid were bottled so you could measure it out precisely?
PC-TEA is a very good developer. But, unfortunately, in many countries TEA forbid sale and shipment now. This is because TEA is the raw material for the production of mustard gas (poisonous gas). Some time ago I tried to find an alternative to TEA. There are organic liquids with a high level of alkalinity, but they are extremely difficult to find in retail.I regularly use PC-TEA and Instant Mytol. I think they are stellar developers and have not found a film that that work poorly with. An advantage to PC-TEA and the glycol variant of Instant Mytol is that the the stock solution is made with an organic solvent that provides long shelf life. With the Inst. Mytol one adds the alkali when mixing working solution and PC-TEA you can just use the stock solution. With these you can get the shelf life more like HC-110 and Rodinal, but eco. friendly and arguably with abetter sharpness/grain/film speed tradeoff. What's not to like? PC-TEA gives great skin tones and outstanding acutance. It is slightly more grainy that XTOl, but not that much. Some films I wouldn't typically use it with would be Kodak & Ilford 3200 films in 35 mm because of grain. Because you mix them up they are cheap and they have decent shelf life so is easy to have both. I use Instant Mytol for fast 35 mm films and Foma 400 and often use PC-TEA for others. XTOL and many other developers have significant amounts of sulphite which has its pros and cons. The sulphite is a preservative and can also soften (replate?) grain in higher concentrations. But what if you have a fine grained film that doesn't need grain softening? People try to dilute developers to mitigate the grain softening. But you are still stuck with some sulphite. With PC-TEA one can entirely avoid the use of sulphite when is not needed. Pat Gainer claimed that ascorbate developers sans sulphite act as surface developer with benefits to image quality though I don't have proof that this is so. I have just begun experimenting with a similar recipe, PG110B (see link) which seems promising.
https://www.photosensitive.ca/wp/easy-film-developers
https://www.flickr.com/groups/1353646@N20/discuss/72157643345178354/
PC-TEA is a very good developer. But, unfortunately, in many countries TEA forbid sale and shipment now. This is because TEA is the raw material for the production of mustard gas (poisonous gas). Some time ago I tried to find an alternative to TEA. There are organic liquids with a high level of alkalinity, but they are extremely difficult to find in retail.
My experience is : the cheaper the coffee, the better the Caffenol
The cheapest coffees use more Robusta than Arabica more expensive. Robusta has morecaffeic acid (phenol)caffeine.
There is also a very active group on facebook where you can ask...
The Technical Photographic Chemistry Class at RIT in 1995 led by Dr. Scott Williams developed a method of developing photographic film using standard household items. They tested mixtures of tea and coffee combined with agents to balance the pH and successfully made printable images for exposed film. At the time they did not call it "Caffenol", but the methods they developed later became commonly called Caffenol.
The Pyro alternatives are OLD - with the modern versions merely being tweaks that make them suitable for things like rotary processing.But I thought the last (and still) big thing was pyrochat / pyrogallo and all that.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?