DIY light meter for darkroom

dkonigs

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 17, 2009
Messages
362
Location
Mountain View, CA
Format
Multi Format
I recently developed an incident light meter for Android (actually my second one) and works very well. The Android SDK only provides integer lux values so a phone cannot be used for an enlarging meter.

I did a lot of experimentation with using an Android phone as an under-the-enlarger incident light meter several months back when I was trying to see if I could use it as a quick-and-dirty way of calibrating the PrintSizer app I was working on at the time. I'm pretty sure I got floating point results. The real problem I had, however, was that whatever filtering Android did before giving me the data was effectively a showstopper. Basically, any change below a certain threshold would be ignored and not passed back through the API. Of course the variations in low light levels that are kinda important for enlarger usage fall in this range.
For the use case of a camera light meter you're working with a lot more light, so this isn't really an issue.
 

dkonigs

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 17, 2009
Messages
362
Location
Mountain View, CA
Format
Multi Format
Thank you guys for the replies, your comments are very helpful. I'm going to look into Ilford's RC paper specs and see if I can get useful times.
Its hard to actually go from Ilford's data sheet to useful times, because the way they measure light (to determine paper speed) may not match your measurement setup at all. I suspect their ISO(P) values are based on measurements w/o a contrast filter and exposures /w a contrast filter, but there are so many extra variables that your own results may still not line up.

However, the ISO(R) contrast range values are likely to be a close match to what you get, at least in my own experience.

Unfortunately, there's really no way to "connect" these two numbers from published information, so you have to consider them completely independent measurements.
 

Nicholas Lindan

Advertiser
Advertiser
Joined
Sep 2, 2006
Messages
4,248
Location
Cleveland, Ohio
Format
Multi Format
I was reluctant [to purchase the Darkroom Automation meter] because they use an order form.

Most purchasers just send an email and pay with PayPal. The order form is for figuring shipping & handling or charges for upgrading a product. Some people do send in the form with a check using, gasp, first class mail.

Meters are now made to order and take 2-3 weeks to ship.

Meters are $94, the Pyro model for metering pyro negatives is $134. In both cases S/H for domestic Priority Mail shipping is $12; international first class air parcel shipping is $32.
 

albada

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 10, 2008
Messages
2,175
Location
Escondido, C
Format
35mm RF
How was your buying experience/shipping times?
My experience was very good. As Matt King pointed out, Darkroom Automation is operated by Nicholas Lindan, who posts here on Photrio.
The meter was shipped within a few days. I believe these meters are built when ordered, causing a delay of a couple of days.
Anyway, I suggest *not* using the USPS for shipping, as they were still slow as of a few weeks ago.
 

DMJ

Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2020
Messages
268
Location
Los Angeles
Format
Multi Format

Great! I just sent you an email.
 

DMJ

Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2020
Messages
268
Location
Los Angeles
Format
Multi Format

I couldn't get floating point numbers from the SDK but it doesn't matter because, as you said, there is a filtering threshold; the main used of the light (ambient) sensor in phones is to adapt the brightness of the screen.
My device is 2x2.5in. and includes temperature and accelerometer sensors. I'm thinking on adding these additional data to the app, perhaps it can be useful for those buying this new enlarger that sits on a tripod and needs leveling. Temperature is always useful.

https://developer.android.com/reference/android/hardware/Sensor#TYPE_LIGHT
 

Nicholas Lindan

Advertiser
Advertiser
Joined
Sep 2, 2006
Messages
4,248
Location
Cleveland, Ohio
Format
Multi Format
I recently purchased [the Darkroom Automation enlarging meter] It measures EV, where EV 0 is defined as the exposure that produces D-max on Ilford RC IV paper when exposed for one minute...

It's not really EV - more like the numbers on a light meter dial. The numbers on a light meter, in combination with the film's ASA, give an EV number. The numbers on the enlarging meter, in combination with the time in stops (0 stops of time = 1 second, 1 stop = 2 seconds, 2 stops = 4 seconds...), give the total exposure in stops. http://www.darkroomautomation.com/em-faq.htm

The range on the meter is 10 stops, equivalent to an exposure range of f2.0 to f64 or 1 to 1024 seconds. A reading of 9.9 results in max black on MGIV, filter #2, in ~1 second.
 
Last edited:

albada

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 10, 2008
Messages
2,175
Location
Escondido, C
Format
35mm RF
It measures EV, where EV 0 is defined as the exposure that produces D-max on Ilford RC IV paper when exposed for one minute.
I need to correct an error in my posting quoted above. From the manual (http://www.darkroomautomation.com/support/eminstructionsj1.pdf), a reading of 0.00 is the light intensity that will produce full black on Ilford MGIV RC paper in 1024 seconds (not 60 seconds).

And Nicholas is correct: Those numbers are not Ev. Should they be called Lv (light value)?
The equation would be: Ev = Lv + Tv, where time_in_seconds = 2^Tv (^ means "raise to power").
Mark Overton
 

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,658
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format
I really see no need for a self-made meter because there are some very good darkroom meters on the market.
 

DMJ

Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2020
Messages
268
Location
Los Angeles
Format
Multi Format
I really see no need for a self-made meter because there are some very good darkroom meters on the market.

I don't know why are you posting this here but I'm replying anyway:
Aside from the fun, building something is a great way to learn a subject. In my case it costs nothing, I already have the materials, the knowledge and skills. It is also a good project for my students too, they will learn computer science, mobile development, engineering and art. In the US we have something called STEAM which is a combination of science and arts and projects like this fit perfectly.

And I think this is one of the reasons why photography appeals to many people from different backgrounds: it is a form of art that can be as scientific or technical. I've been into this for 40 years and still learning!
 
OP
OP

radiant

Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2019
Messages
2,135
Location
Europe
Format
Hybrid
I made some measurements after long pause and I've been thinking of developing my UI a bit. However here are shots from my measurement (highlight & shadow):



You can see that in that frame the shadows are at lux 0.0342 and highlights at 0.1371 lux. Just for reference if anyone is doing similar device.

That measured frame has 2.05 stops range and density 0.62 (if I've calculated right..).
 
OP
OP

radiant

Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2019
Messages
2,135
Location
Europe
Format
Hybrid
Maybe I have to explain a bit.

The "measured" value is in f-stops so luxes converted to f-stop (log2). To get some positive f-stop numbers I multiply lux by 1000.

"fdiff" shows this currently measured value against EEPROM stored value. Of coure it is meaningful to set this to the value that gives first details in highlights, aka "almost" white.

What is still a bit stupid is that I need to know the exposure time which I used. So I need to manually calculate that. Lets say I exposed for 4 stops to get correct exposure when making the "calibration". Now I change the negative and for example end up with "fdiff" of value 1, I know that the highlights on this second negative pass more light to the paper. I now know I need to decrease the exposure by 1 stop and expose for 3 stops.

This is how it works in theory.. Feel free to question this
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…