faberryman
Member
In response to that 'scan and discard' story, I think...
- what if the sailor at Pearl Harbor took photos with his camera, got the film processed and printed, got the prints back and trashed the negatives...and then the prints got lost or ruined in a flood? The images would have been lost to historians.
- What if I took photos of Kamala Harris as VP visitng San Francisco, processed the film and had them scanned and threw away the negatives, and the harddrive that I stored the photos on could no longer function (because of head crash) and the DVD-RW with the scanned images degraded the reflective layer so that data was irretrievable...and she became the first female President of the US? The images would have been lost to historians.
Folks think they do not 'lose' digital data, not comprehending that it is hard to find a ST-506 controller for 1988 harddrive that will fit into a 2022 PC bus, so the data on that 1988 harddrive is now irretrievable.
I made photographs of a variety of politicians and anti-war figures in Washington D.C. toward the end of the Vietnam War. The negatives disappeared during one of my moves. Historians are not crying. The world has not ended.
There are a lot of photographs of Pearl Harbor. There are a lot of photos of Kamala Harris.
Why would a photographer save his scans on a 1988 hard drive? My first hard drive with a ST-506 controller was a 20MB full height Seagate. Yes, 20MB. That would not have held many scans.
Why are you scanning your film anyway? Make prints and put them in a safety deposit box if you are worried about posterity.
Last edited: