D23 & Pyrocat-HD Comparison

about to extinct

D
about to extinct

  • 0
  • 0
  • 30
Fantasyland!

D
Fantasyland!

  • 9
  • 2
  • 102
perfect cirkel

D
perfect cirkel

  • 2
  • 1
  • 121
Thomas J Walls cafe.

A
Thomas J Walls cafe.

  • 4
  • 6
  • 286

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,745
Messages
2,780,278
Members
99,693
Latest member
lachanalia
Recent bookmarks
0
OP
OP
Andrew O'Neill

Andrew O'Neill

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
11,956
Location
Coquitlam,BC Canada
Format
Multi Format
I find both very unsatisfactory but that may well be due to the scanning process

I would be very much interested how they actually print on conventional paper.

Bests,

David.
ww.ddsallen.de

I don't print on conventional paper... silver gelatin?. Carbon transfer, mainly and other alt processes.
 

Gerald C Koch

Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2010
Messages
8,131
Location
Southern USA
Format
Multi Format
But at 1+3 the sulfite is at 25g/l, which is at least half the optimal concentration of 50-80g/l for solvent action surely?

(I may be misremembering of course, but I'm pretty sure I got that number from a post of Gerald's :smile:)

Yes, the number is about 70 g/l but ever at only 25 g/l the sulfite content is much high than for pyrocat.
 

esearing

Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2004
Messages
364
Location
North GA
Format
4x5 Format
The thing I have learned about Pyrocat HD is that those who use it as their main developer often explore different dilutions and agitation techniques to work with difficult lighting situations. Normal development is relatively easy with any developer but when you need expansion or contraction of N+or-2, pyrocat begins to shine and is very controllable. Does D23 have similar common use for semi-stand/stand techniques with dilution? What is its shelf life for the infrequent user? Availablility if not mixing own?
 
OP
OP
Andrew O'Neill

Andrew O'Neill

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
11,956
Location
Coquitlam,BC Canada
Format
Multi Format
Divided D-23 is pretty good at handling extreme N- situations. As far as stand/semi-stand development goes, I would think that it wouldn't be a good candidate due to high sodium sulfite content. If you're a Pyrocat-HD user like me, I'd stick with Pyrocat. It's such a versatile developer. Since D-23 is not on the shelves anymore, one has to mix from scratch... which is a piece of cake.
Check out Ken Lee's site: http://www.kennethleegallery.com/html/tech/D-23.php
 
OP
OP
Andrew O'Neill

Andrew O'Neill

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jan 16, 2004
Messages
11,956
Location
Coquitlam,BC Canada
Format
Multi Format
But you still need sharp negatives :D

David was asking about the attached images, and the quality in terms of tones, sharpness etc.

Ian

Looks acceptable to my eye. My students just developed all their film at 1+3 for 18 minutes (EI 200) and they look very nice. Not as sharp as Pyrocat, though.
 

Zelph

Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2013
Messages
63
Format
Multi Format
They look, if not identical, very similar. It strengthens my belief that the choice of developer has nothing to do with making a good picture.
It does have something to do with safety and comfort to those who develop allergic reactions to metol.
 

jonasfj

Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2013
Messages
198
Format
35mm
It does have something to do with safety and comfort to those who develop allergic reactions to metol.
Yes, for those worried about health and environment, Xtol would be the obvious choice. Pyrocat and Rodinal are downright poisonous. D-76 and HC-110 a little bit less so, but still not good. I would recommend everybody to be careful and treat also Xtol as a chemical, but it is quite harmless.
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,262
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
Yes, for those worried about health and environment, Xtol would be the obvious choice. Pyrocat and Rodinal are downright poisonous. D-76 and HC-110 a little bit less so, but still not good. I would recommend everybody to be careful and treat also Xtol as a chemical, but it is quite harmless.

There's far worse household items in everyday use in kitchens, bathrooms, etc, there needs to be more realism.

Ian
 

Anon Ymous

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2008
Messages
3,661
Location
Greece
Format
35mm
Uh, Metol might not be the most benign stuff on earth, but Catechol is definitely one of the nastiest developing agents used. It's not that it can't be used safely, but should definitely be treated accordingly.
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,262
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
Uh, Metol might not be the most benign stuff on earth, but Catechol is definitely one of the nastiest developing agents used. It's not that it can't be used safely, but should definitely be treated accordingly.

But then stop bath is dangerous when concentrated, so is house-hold Sodium Hypochlorite based bleach, oven cleaners it's a long list.

It's the mixing Pyrocatechin developers from raw chemicals that's potentially the most hazardous, once in use it's not going to hurt you unless you constantly get it on your skin and don't wash it off immediately. I wouldn't use it for a print developer where I do immerse my fingers sometimes (PQ not MQ) but I do use it in IT-8 toner as the paper's redeveloper with tongues,

Ian
 

jim appleyard

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 21, 2004
Messages
2,413
Format
Multi Format
Ian, isn't Q rather nasty stuff to be putting your fingers in? Isn't Q related (closely?) to pyrogallol and catechol? They're all benzene rings (?) and those are quite nasty. However, I agree that there are many things in our normal life that aren't good and we should be careful of them all.
 

Anon Ymous

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2008
Messages
3,661
Location
Greece
Format
35mm
Just because a compound has a benzene ring, it doesn't mean that it is inherently very hazardous; phenidone has a benzene ring too, but is much less toxic. For the record, hydroquinone and Catechol are isomers, the position of a hydroxyl group is the difference between them.
 

jim appleyard

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 21, 2004
Messages
2,413
Format
Multi Format
Just because a compound has a benzene ring, it doesn't mean that it is inherently very hazardous; phenidone has a benzene ring too, but is much less toxic. For the record, hydroquinone and Catechol are isomers, the position of a hydroxyl group is the difference between them.

Well, you lost me, I am not a chemist. If you say that a benzene ring can be less hazardous that I assume, I will take your word for it.
 

Anon Ymous

Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2008
Messages
3,661
Location
Greece
Format
35mm
Well, you lost me, I am not a chemist. If you say that a benzene ring can be less hazardous that I assume, I will take your word for it.
Take sodium benzoate for example. It's a very common food preservative, your soft drink might have a small amount of it.

PS I'm not a chemist either.
 

Ian Grant

Subscriber
Joined
Aug 2, 2004
Messages
23,262
Location
West Midland
Format
Multi Format
Ian, isn't Q rather nasty stuff to be putting your fingers in? Isn't Q related (closely?) to pyrogallol and catechol? They're all benzene rings (?) and those are quite nasty. However, I agree that there are many things in our normal life that aren't good and we should be careful of them all.

Lots of things are nasty, Coke will dissolve your teeth, it's about realism. I use tongs in the darkroom when printing but at times particularly with large prints prefer to use fingers which get rinsed well immediately after.

I ran a lab, I had to do the COSSH assessments, that's risk analysis and putting correct safety procedures in place and we dealt with chemicals far more hazardous than the average photographer will use, so I have confidence in my comments. Everything we use has an MSDS (data-sheet) which should be read. I have grave concerns that many household products don't carry sufficient warnings and they are being used by people with in general no chemical knowledge, particularly in relation to their own safety.

Ian
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom