Photo Engineer
Subscriber
Thanks Matt. I don't track these links as it is just too much for me and I have many of them in hard copy or personal notes.
PE
PE
Use C41 fix or TF5.
PE
There is no cross identification with bottle name or purposes.
Finally, CAS 139-89-9. An extremely long name I won't waste time copying, one source says it's proprietary. A shortened name is Trisodium HEDTA. The bleach, I presume.
There is.
The "nasty" stuff is listed per bottle.
No.
Not a bleaching substance. It is not of the Redox-type.
I assume it is employed as alternative to complexing EDTA. It is part of the developer.
thanks, of course!Etidronic Acid is also known as Dequest 2010. It's a powerful sequestering agent for iron and copper ions, and I would assume it is contained in the color developer (or first developer in case of E-6).
In some commercial bleaches I have seen multiple iron chelating agents, and this Etidronic Acid appears to be one of them, but most likely not the only one in their.
Paul, the MSDS supplied on the Macodirekt site is a 46 page document, and the first 8 pages are for CD part A. These first 8 pages list the four compounds you mentioned. Therefore I have to correct my prior posting: Trisodium HEDTA works together with the Etidronic Acid to sequester iron, copper, calcium, magnesium and a whole range of other metal ions which cause either scaling or premature developer oxidation. Neither of these two compounds are used in the BLIX.@AgX "There is.
The "nasty" stuff is listed per bottle." No, it isn't. Neither on the bottles, nor crossed to any bottle on their MSDS.
How about that. 72 years old, always dabbling in science, never came across it. Certainly never in regards C-41 chemistry.Etidronic acid is not exotic. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Etidronic_acid
A very common medication.
PE
Paul, the MSDS supplied on the Macodirekt site is a 46 page document, and the first 8 pages are for CD part A. These first 8 pages list the four compounds you mentioned. Therefore I have to correct my prior posting: Trisodium HEDTA works together with the Etidronic Acid to sequester iron, copper, calcium, magnesium and a whole range of other metal ions which cause either scaling or premature developer oxidation. Neither of these two compounds are used in the BLIX.
Now that I take a closer look at the MSDS, the BLIX is very odd: BLIX part A contains 10-15% of a compound with CAS number 111687-36-6. This compound is also called "Ammonium Ferric PDTA" and is the compound used in Flexicolor Bleach III. This compound is more powerful than Ammonium Ferric EDTA, and until now I was not aware that one could make a stable BLIX with it. Since this MSDS carefully avoids listing compounds it doesn't have to, I can't tell whether there is also Ammonium Ferric EDTA in BLIX part A of this product. Is it a very thick red liquid? What does the BLIX look like?
For additional processes 50% of the (blix) has to be exchanged with fresh solution."
Why might that be?
A bleach uses some of its bromide and its acidity, but its oxidative strength is restored with aeration. A BLIX, however, gets loaded with silver over time, and if its fixer component gets clogged with silver, then both bleaching and fixation will be incomplete. Therefore a BLIX can be reused much less than a bleach. It should not come as a surprise, that Tetenal sells BLIX kits to amateurs and bleach&fixer kits to labs.
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |