Huss
Member
@Huss sorry I should have said "certain properties shared between emulsions", as I am convinced you're making the same alteration after scanning to get "the look". We all do. Love the woman+bridge photo, BTW, but I've done enough Delta 3200 to know that it's not that grainy, even in 135. So you're either did something to it, or DF96 blows up grain and throws away mid-tones.
If I had little room for chemicals I'd certainly still be using Df96. It has no real advantage over separate chemicals if you have a full darkroom and room to store concentrates and stock solutions.
Or in my case where I do a lot of work atm on my house and have neither the time or the interest in a real dark roomExactly. I just have a small bathroom with most of the space taken up by 'er indoors. If I had a real work area/darkroom, I'd be using D76 etc
But I am happy with what DF96 has been able to do for me in the meantime.
I began posting here in the color section because I had intended to learn how to develop by going straight to C41. Ultimately I ended up going with B&W and DF96 just to get a taste. These images are from my first attempt, which took place Saturday. I'm pretty happy with the results, although I'm sure those with a critical eye will find issues. I figure I'll get better as I go, may try some other methods and chemicals. Anyway, like I said, I'm happy for a first attempt, and I honestly don't know how it could've been easier.
P1061625 by telecast, on Flickr
P1061632 by telecast, on Flickr
I really like the second pic.
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |