Rick A
Subscriber
Thank you Frank, I couldn't have said it better. That is exactly what I meant in my first post. If neo's take the time to learn all the aspects of what the components of a photograph are made of, the relationships of the film, lens, and speed/aperture, along with the composition, and how they come together,is whats needed, and not an automaton that does the work for you. I don't know how people can call themselves "photographers" if they cannot perform the basic operations. IMO users of "fully automatic"cameras are merely snapshooters. It does no good to have a machine that does everything, even if you can override the controls, if you don't know why, or when you need to take control.I really must take issue with that. While I have no quarrel with auto-everything SLR's, I do not think that using one is the best way to learn how film, cameras, and lenses work together. Yes, almost all of them offer manual overrides. But the temptation to rely on the camera's automation is too great to be ignored, and that only serves to reinforce the belief in beginners that shutter speed, aperture, and focus are matters beyond their comprehension. It does take a bit of work to figure these things out, but in the end it is worthwhile. Light meters can lie, and auto-exposure can be fooled. Autofocus is not always dead on accurate. When you do get to an automatic camera, you'll already know how and why these errors occur; and you'll know how to compensate for these shortcomings.
Rick