Camera for a beginner!

[forwhom]

Hi to All!

I am totally new in analog photography. This technique is interesting for me. I am planning to buy a second hand camera. I need some feedback wich option is the best for a beginner.

I found these options:

1: Canon F1000N with factory lenses, with Sigma 70-300 1:4-5.6 DL MACRO
2: Canon EOS 3000 38-76mm Canon lense, + 100-300 Tamron
3: Nikon F65, nikkor AF 28-80mm 1:3,3-5,6
4: Nikon F601 nikkor AF 35-80mm, nikkor AF 70-210mm


Thanks for your help!

Bye,
forwhom

 

[Erik Petersson]

Hi forwhom
You will find that there are very much to choose between, and everyone will have their own favourites. Canon and Nikon are both excellent choices. Myself I use Nikon, but older ones without autofocus and cannot therefore comment on the F65 or F601. Most Nikkor lenses are very good. However, the lenses you list seem to be a little slow to me. You should be able to find faster ones, that is f 2.8 instead of 3.3 or 5.6. Fast lenses are easier to find if you do not choose a zoom.

good luck!
Erik

 

[Rick A]

Hi to All!

I am totally new in analog photography. This technique is interesting for me. I am planning to buy a second hand camera. I need some feedback wich option is the best for a beginner.

I found these options:

1: Canon F1000N with factory lenses, with Sigma 70-300 1:4-5.6 DL MACRO
2: Canon EOS 3000 38-76mm Canon lense, + 100-300 Tamron
3: Nikon F65, nikkor AF 28-80mm 1:3,3-5,6
4: Nikon F601 nikkor AF 35-80mm, nikkor AF 70-210mm


Thanks for your help!

Bye,
forwhom

My recommendation to beginners is always a manual everything, simple match needle metered, prime lens only, 35mm slr, and NO motor drive. learn the basics, then graduate to more bells and whistles as you become more confident in your abilities. The more complex the camera, the more time needed to master the controles instead of mastering the image IMHO.

 

[Fireguy2002]

Welcome. I'm going on my second week in analog myself. I agree with the other two. Go manual focus, manual everything. I myself went the Canon route. There are plenty of the "AE-1 Program"(different than the AE-1) to be had on Ebay. Most for under $40 and some with lenses. Like the rest of things on Ebay, just check the sellers rating and comments like "light seals replaced" "no mirror squeal". These two pictures are from my first roll through my AE-1P. It happens to be the second roll I processed myself. Everyone has their preference. This just happens to be mine.
Good luck with everything.

 

[Christopher Walrath]

Wirelessly posted (BBBold: BlackBerry9000/4.6.0.297 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 VendorID/102 UP.Link/6.3.0.0.0)

And for the matter don't rule out the Minolta sr and x series cameras and the great Pentaxes like the K1000. Great cameras and more bang for your buck.

 

[thicktheo]

Get an Olympus OM-2n - bright viewfinder, compact body, nice lenses. In my opinion, it's much better than any Canon or Nikon of its era.

 

[Fireguy2002]

Did I mention everyone has their own preference?

 

[Mark Fisher]

Honestly, it doesn't matter which camera you go with as long as it allows easy manual use. What matters more is that you try a fast prime lens. Everyone, autofocus or not, has a fast, inexpensive 50mm lens. You learn a lot by using a simple lens like that..plus the quality is better!

 

[WetMogwai]

I wouldn't recommend any of those for a beginner. Get a simple rangefinder, like a Canonette or a Minolta HiMatic. Consider a Mamiya 6 or 7 if you want to go medium format. They allow you to get the shot without worrying about what lens you have. There is no missing shots because you are changing lenses. They often have all manual operation with the option of auto exposure, but focus is always manual. They also allow you to shoot al lower shutter speeds because they have no mirror to cause vibration. When I'm shooting 35mm, I'm usually using a rangefinder. Lately, it has been an Olympus XA.

Of course, if you want to shoot fast action, like sports, pets, and children, get an SLR. I like my Canon Elan IIe. I can make it all manual if I like or let it do all the focus and exposure work. The lens mount is the same as the current one, so all the lenses they still make work with it.

 

[Fireguy2002]

I was only going with what a large number of people learn on(HS/college photography classes). Plus it's the one I've been learning on, and it works. If you want to stay simple, stay digital.

 

[Joe Grodis]

The best way to learn photography is to go strictly manual at first. I'd suggest a manual Nikon of sorts that takes the F mount lens. Now keep in mind the the Nikon F-mount lens "system" is the most successful lens mount of all time. Therefore... your lens selection is superior to "Anything" else. If cost is an issue look for a Nikon EM if you have a "few" extra dollars look for the Nikon FM3a.

 

[Fireguy2002]

I'm in Fairbanks, AK and there's not a whole lot of cameras/lenses sold north of here. I've done very well finding FD and FDn mount lenses for the A-series. I also spent $55 for an AV-1, AE-1P and three lenses. Aside from operator error, my photos have been great.

 

[bobwysiwyg]

My recommendation to beginners is always a manual everything, simple match needle metered, prime lens only, 35mm slr, and NO motor drive. learn the basics, then graduate to more bells and whistles as you become more confident in your abilities. The more complex the camera, the more time needed to master the controles instead of mastering the image IMHO.

+1 on this as a recommendation. I might even go one step further and suggest a totally manual camera plus a simple hand-held meter as it makes you think about setting various aspects of the camera for the shot. However, I can see that some sort of in-cam match needle, etc. makes for a more compact kit.

 

[Simplicius]

pick up a Fujica ST705 or one of the earlier versions. which are fully manual, very cheap second hand and a great robust camera. They usually have fujinon EBC lens in M42 mount, this is great glass and for future use there are loads of cheap lenses fit it

 

[mrmekon]

I started with only a slow zoom (35-210, f/4). My first lens purchase was a 28mm f/2.8 and a 50mm f/1.4, and I found that the 50/1.4 ended up being *the* change that moved me from occasionally taking pictures to always having a camera. The ability to shoot in low light without having to push-process the film was extremely, extremely beneficial. I back everyone above who recommended a manual camera with a fast prime.

I like Minolta, since they're just as high quality but can be had a little cheaper, but I also have a Canon AE-1 and AL-1 which are both very nice.

 

[Jeff Kubach]

Those cameras you mention are good choices. I prefer the manual cameras. I like the Canon FTb with the FD lenses. Good camera and lenses and at a good price.

Jeff

 

[forwhom]

Thank you for the replies! Now this is a bit difficult Looking eBay is OK but shipping to my Country is expensive. I am in Hungary. So it would be great to find a stuff where from the shipping cost is not too much.

And to tell the truth I am totally new as I mentioned. So I have very minimal knowledge on lenses. So I do not know what to do right now

 

[Jeff Kubach]

BTW welcome to APUG! You might choice a 50mm or a short zoom lense, and go from there.

Jeff

 

[glockman99]

Listen to me...I'm 55 years old, and have been into photography for longer than most people have been alive. Get yourself a Nikon FM2 or a FE2, along with a Nikkor 50mm f/1.8 or f/2 AI lens, and alot of 200 ISO film.

 

[Andrew Horodysky]

Canon AE-1, Nikon FM, Pentax K1000, among others. I also agree with the mention of a rangefinder Canonette. Use a dedicated (Canon, Nikon, or Pentax) 50mm and/or 35mm to start. It'll let you concentrate more with composing/picture-making, rather than playing and fidgeting with a zoom. You can get great prices for these at KEH.

Dead Link Removed

 

[Shawn Rahman]

I know hell is coming to me for suggesting this, but I disagree that a manual everything camera is ideal for someone just starting to learn photography.

I would much rather suggest AT LEAST an aperture priority, auto focus camera, so that a brand new beginner can focus primarily and foremost on composition and the visual components of what makes fine pictures. Let the camera take care of the exposure at first.

Then, as expertise grows, one can slowly go manual, using the aid of the camera that allows you to do so.

 

[removed account4]

my 2 choices aren't on your list ..
one would be a pentax k1000 and a 50mm lens.
they can be found used for not much money ...
and they are fully manual so you will learn the relationships between film speed, shutter speed and fstop.
their resale value as very good, since a lot of people look for one
when they start out, so if you decide you want something else after a while ...
you can sell it and get something else. i still have mine, it was new in 1981, and still works well.

the other choice would be a box camera ... yeah, i know 120 format film, and old camera ..
but a box camera will allow you to free up all your thoughts to shooting and composing instead of
fiddling around with all the mechanisms.
they can be found cheap as well ...

if i could get rid of everything i own and just use one camera
it would be a fixed lens box ...

have fun
john

 

[fschifano]

I really must take issue with that. While I have no quarrel with auto-everything SLR's, I do not think that using one is the best way to learn how film, cameras, and lenses work together. Yes, almost all of them offer manual overrides. But the temptation to rely on the camera's automation is too great to be ignored, and that only serves to reinforce the belief in beginners that shutter speed, aperture, and focus are matters beyond their comprehension. It does take a bit of work to figure these things out, but in the end it is worthwhile. Light meters can lie, and auto-exposure can be fooled. Autofocus is not always dead on accurate. When you do get to an automatic camera, you'll already know how and why these errors occur; and you'll know how to compensate for these shortcomings.

 

[Darkroom317]

I started out with an AE-1 using shutter priority and have been the better for it. I now use my cameras in manual mode using the meter as a guide. I am also more aware of depth of field because of manual focus.

 

[Shawn Rahman]

Frank,

I don't disagree with anything that you've written, but I think we tend to forget how difficult photography can be. My chief concern is that photography should be as enjoyable as possible at first before it becomes skill or practice to be refined.

I started out with a fully automated camera (the original Maxxum 7000), and now use either mostly manual cameras, or in automated ones in totally manual mode (Nikon F3HP; Mamiya 645; Leica M7).

Everyone's experience is different, of course, but I feel that my initial enjoyment of photography would have suffered slightly if I was too bogged down trying to nail exposure, DOF, etc. Yes - the learning curve is not so steep for those willing to go beyond the help of automation, but I think perhaps that should be the next step.