Caffenol chemicals?

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
200,400
Messages
2,807,616
Members
100,249
Latest member
bnoa5eyes
Recent bookmarks
0

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
25,012
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
Are higher speed films susceptible to fog and if they are why are they?
Yes, they are because they're fast. They're sensitive so they also respond more strongly to heat and background radiation.
I personally don't think an anti-foggant/restrainer is really necessary when using reasonably fresh or slow film.
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
20,154
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
Yes, they are because they're fast. They're sensitive so they also respond more strongly to heat and background radiation.
I personally don't think an anti-foggant/restrainer is really necessary when using reasonably fresh or slow film.

Thanks Just to be sure, if a fast film, say HP5+ or Delta 3200 is reasonably fresh then KBr is unlikely to be needed? Assuming the user has properly stored the fresh film then at what age might it be affected by fog and if it might be affected, can you still simply print through it without it affectíng the print ?

Thanks

pentaxuser
 

npl

Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2021
Messages
229
Location
France
Format
35mm
I tested 100 ISO film (fomapan 100) with and without iodized salt and could see a clear difference in fog level between the two. I prefer less so I use salt, but that didn't mean that the fog couldn't be print through.
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
25,012
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
Thanks Just to be sure, if a fast film, say HP5+ or Delta 3200 is reasonably fresh then KBr is unlikely to be needed? Assuming the user has properly stored the fresh film then at what age might it be affected by fog and if it might be affected, can you still simply print through it without it affectíng the print ?

That's what I'd expect, yes. Of course, a restrainer when added in small amounts will subtly affect the tonal curve, especially in the toe region. So the statement "without affecting the print" will always be a bit problematic if it's taken in a literal, absolute way. So I'd add "for all intents and purposes."
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
20,154
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
That's what I'd expect, yes. Of course, a restrainer when added in small amounts will subtly affect the tonal curve, especially in the toe region. So the statement "without affecting the print" will always be a bit problematic if it's taken in a literal, absolute way. So I'd add "for all intents and purposes."

Thanks That covers it for me

pentaxuser
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom