• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Bulk rolling 120/220 film

Well, they're put up for sale. Whether someone buys them is a different matter.

Either way, I don't think for EK the potential and very soft/weak value of selling this as a sustainability gain would offset the loss in value due to channel conflicts, reputation damage, transaction cost due to small-scale sales etc. As to the latter - if an EK employee spends 10 minutes on your order, they'll likely not make any money on that small volume of film. What's the rationale for them? All they can do on such small-scale sales is lose money and incur all manner of risks (=additional costs). It might be different if they were organized for high-mix/low-volume e-commerce sales, but fact of the matter is that they're no Amazon and they likely don't aspire to become one.

Keep in mind that this is a manufacturing company and they're in business to make money. Ultimately someone in the chain of command will look at it through that lens and if it doesn't make sense, it ain't gonna happen.
 
Kodak buys back unused cans. Studios deal with the leftover shirt ends and recans. Sometimes they sell it, sometimes they keep it for future projects if they have them in the immediate future. However the studios and film brokers have been told not to sell to photographers now.

As far as your last points, there are 120 making machines that you can buy now, they are still only semi-automated and cost $9k, but they have a very consistent quality compared to hand rolled film. And if you are large enough to justify that, you will have a contact with a movie studio that gets you a constant supply of film. This is why 120 Cine film in China is extremely common now, even more than before.
 
If EK can't sell enough still film cheaply, the production will be shifted away from photographic products to their other products that make use of their coating technology and expertise. The machines and people are already being used for more and more of that.
It is all about return on investment. And EK is absolutely ruthless about factoring in every possible cost relating to the product sold when determining that ROI.
With Kodak Alaris, EK basically had no need to factor in downstream costs, and with a single customer with (I expect) minimum order requirements, it was relatively easy to convince management to continue to devote capital to the still film business.
Without Kodak Alaris being in that role, I'm really concerned about continued availability of product - particularly given current political and economic realities.
 

That's an interesting perspective. So why is EK selling anything directly? Why not continue to funnel everything through Alaris?

I'm a total non expert and am not questioning that this is factually correct. Just observing that basically everything I read on the web is anti Alaris, but you're highlighting the benefit for EK.
 
Theodor Bader said:
Maybe. Looking around the world, all sorts of trivial things are being sold as environmentally friendly. That's all I can think of right now.
Click to expand...

The incentives that once existed in the United States to tout environmental “wins”, even trivial ones, are largely gone.
 
That doesn’t have a simple answer.

This is my understanding of some information that may or may not be accurate. Do take it with a grain of salt.

KA was originally tasked with being the sole seller and distributor of stills film as a means to create an income stream for the UK Pension Fund. However, allegedly that agreement only lasted until 2018, at which point Kodak was free to sell films on their own, and it seems they may have been doing B2B for some time now. But they stayed with Alaris as they had taken over the old selling/distributing network and Kodak didn’t want to have to rebuild that since the market was pretty much nonexistent.

However, at some point, they decided to rebuild a distribution network on their own and begin selling film again, apparently something in the works for the last couple years. Why they did this is probably a combination of seeing a resurgence in the market, and Kodak wanting to distance themselves from KA (possibly due to the buyout).

Friend who knows people seems to think they’re rolling out the film as they coat new batches of each emulsion, which does actually make a bit of sense. It should allow Kodak to get more money per roll without putting that price on the end customer, so I’m optimistic.
 
The initial KA - EK agreement was renewed/replaced and continued into the Covid years, when Kodak Alaris had huge problems due to all the pandemic related effects on shipping and markets.
At that point, the agreement was re-negotiated and EK was able to expand its sales of things like entire master rolls of the remjet lacking Vision stocks to Cinestill, but KA continued to have exclusive rights for most still films.
The recent changes are quite opaque, but I expect that they will not bode well for most of us interested in niche products like Kodak black and white roll films - particularly if we are outside the USA.
 

I'm always amazed we can still get 120 film in as many choices. I agree that KA has been great at distribution. Very unknown territory we are in. Politics is for another forum but I've never seen anything remotely like what's happening today, and additionally, right now silver is 99 USD per troy ounce.
 
MattKing said:
The recent changes are quite opaque, but I expect that they will not bode well for most of us interested in niche products like Kodak black and white roll films - particularly if we are outside the USA.
Click to expand...
Are you thinking Kodak may discontinue still B&W film? Or stop selling bulk rolls?
 
I just ordered 10 rolls of 120 Tri-X

I love Ilford and Kentmere but dang the tariffs are brutal to buy good British made film. I have loaded up on the Kentmere 200, bulk 35mm and plenty of 120, I'm very fond of this stuff. No one left outside of Europe making black and white paper, love the Foma and Ilford.

Crazy time.
 
farpointer said:
Are you thinking Kodak may discontinue still B&W film? Or stop selling bulk rolls?
Click to expand...

Eastman Kodak's sales of still B&W film are smaller than Harman/Ilford's.
Harman/Ilford's production facilities are much more appropriately sized for current markets than Eastman Kodak's - in particular wrt bulk rolls.
The EK machinery and systems for bulk rolls are relatively ancient - they are remnants from when bulk rolls were used by high volume school and ID photography users and are not really designed for the sort of customers that we are - and as such, production of those rolls is incredibly labour intensive and really costly.
And unlike Harman/Ilford, the still film business is a relatively small part of EK's business, that has to compete with the other EK coating related businesses for capital and resources.
If the EK still film people have to justify a niche product like B&W still film in order to get access to the necessary capital and resources, and if that justification isn't supported by an entity like KA and its likely obligation to purchase relatively high quantities and if EK also has to shoulder more of the marketing and distribution costs, management are going to be less likely to want to devote those relatively scarce resources to B&W film when there may very well be more profits available from other products.
 
lt_col_gordon_tall said:
That's an interesting perspective. So why is EK selling anything directly? Why not continue to funnel everything through Alaris?
Click to expand...

I expect much of that is due to decisions by Kodak Alaris, which may relate to minimum order issues.
 
rduraoc said:
Taking here the opportunity to remind everyone
Click to expand...
Thanks, I'll do the same:
...that this thread is about DIY spooling 120/220, not about Kodak's film distribution. More comments on the latter topic can go here: https://www.photrio.com/forum/threa...om-eastman-kodak-was-kodacolor-100-new.216146
...that we like to keep ads out of the general forum, but since you're giving away something for free and it's related to the thread, we'll let it slip as a relevant notification and leave your post here. But in general, please don't use forum threads to advertise sales.
 
Cholentpot said:
I'd take you up on the offer but the shipping from Belgium to the Great Lakes would be prohibitively expensive.
Click to expand...
This was my exact response a few months ago…
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register