Building a huge shutter for large format lenses

CK341

A
CK341

  • 0
  • 0
  • 36
Plum, Sun, Shade.jpeg

A
Plum, Sun, Shade.jpeg

  • sly
  • May 8, 2025
  • 2
  • 0
  • 49
Windfall 1.jpeg

A
Windfall 1.jpeg

  • sly
  • May 8, 2025
  • 5
  • 0
  • 46
Windfall 2.jpeg

A
Windfall 2.jpeg

  • sly
  • May 8, 2025
  • 1
  • 0
  • 44
Marsh, Oak Leaves.jpeg

A
Marsh, Oak Leaves.jpeg

  • sly
  • May 8, 2025
  • 0
  • 0
  • 42

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,610
Messages
2,761,938
Members
99,416
Latest member
TomYC
Recent bookmarks
0

NiallerM

Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2024
Messages
62
Location
France
Format
4x5 Format
It's an amazing task. It's probably way too late to make any meaningful suggestions, but I'd probably personally opt for a solution involving a completely separate shutter for those open shots, and a more standard shutter for other use. That's purely from looking at things in a modular way. It would reduce wear to when it is necessary. Also (in the sense of the hammer-owner to whom every problem is a nail), and because I have one handy, I'd probably opt for compressed air (I mean a serious compressor) if I wanted that type of torque, both in opening and closing. Slower than a solenoid, but do you need instant response, or do you need that short exposure more? You won't be taking sport shots obviously!


It's a fascinating problem. Good luck with it!
 

koraks

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Messages
20,969
Location
Europe
Format
Multi Format
I'd probably opt for compressed air (I mean a serious compressor)

In the field, this may look something like so:
1726660158835.png


Sorry, couldn't resist...

Welcome to Photrio! Hope to read more from you in the future!
 

NiallerM

Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2024
Messages
62
Location
France
Format
4x5 Format
In the field, this may look something like so:
View attachment 378913

Sorry, couldn't resist...

Welcome to Photrio! Hope to read more from you in the future!

Yup!!! Something like that! Just slide it in between the filters and the film frames in the case....

Thank you for the welcome. I'm about to head to the introductions sub-forum...
 

NiallerM

Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2024
Messages
62
Location
France
Format
4x5 Format
My main question here is as to how to dampen such an abrupt and weighty movement. To be honest, I'd look at a two part shutter. First, a curtain type at the rear of the lens, then the leaf shutter. The leaf shutter would need to be manually cocked under strong resistance, to the open position. Then the curtain drops (under power), to reveal the open lens with wide aperture, which, through an electric timer is timed to the appropriate delay to clang shut after the exposure.
 

Richard Man

Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2005
Messages
1,301
Format
Multi Format
My main question here is as to how to dampen such an abrupt and weighty movement. To be honest, I'd look at a two part shutter. First, a curtain type at the rear of the lens, then the leaf shutter. The leaf shutter would need to be manually cocked under strong resistance, to the open position. Then the curtain drops (under power), to reveal the open lens with wide aperture, which, through an electric timer is timed to the appropriate delay to clang shut after the exposure.

Yes, one of the problems I had with the Guillotine shutter was that it slams down HARD, and causing stress to the lens standard lock.
 
OP
OP
Joined
Feb 26, 2024
Messages
54
Location
Finland
Format
Multi Format
It's an amazing task. It's probably way too late to make any meaningful suggestions, but I'd probably personally opt for a solution involving a completely separate shutter for those open shots, and a more standard shutter for other use. That's purely from looking at things in a modular way. It would reduce wear to when it is necessary. Also (in the sense of the hammer-owner to whom every problem is a nail), and because I have one handy, I'd probably opt for compressed air (I mean a serious compressor) if I wanted that type of torque, both in opening and closing. Slower than a solenoid, but do you need instant response, or do you need that short exposure more? You won't be taking sport shots obviously!


It's a fascinating problem. Good luck with it!
Hmm, yeah probably! Compressed air would be very nice actuation method for sure. Being able to adjust and even make softer closing/opening.
It could have very light mass piston made of plastic, too. Not like iron core of solenoid.

Solenoid is so much easier to control and if its possible to make work it will be simpler, I think. That air thing could be good solution if solenoids are being too problematic for some reason.

About the shutter time, it doesnt need to shoot sports, but I want to be able to shoot portraits outside. So about 1/30s or shorter.
 
Last edited:
OP
OP
Joined
Feb 26, 2024
Messages
54
Location
Finland
Format
Multi Format
My main question here is as to how to dampen such an abrupt and weighty movement. To be honest, I'd look at a two part shutter. First, a curtain type at the rear of the lens, then the leaf shutter. The leaf shutter would need to be manually cocked under strong resistance, to the open position. Then the curtain drops (under power), to reveal the open lens with wide aperture, which, through an electric timer is timed to the appropriate delay to clang shut after the exposure.

Yes, one of the problems I had with the Guillotine shutter was that it slams down HARD, and causing stress to the lens standard lock.
I have been thinking about this, if the shutter shake will be a problem. But this type of a shutter is known to cause minimal amount of shutter shake.

Being so far away from film, but also shutter leafs moving short distance and moving symmetrically, cancelling out some forces. Shutter and lenses will be so heavy that it will need a lot of force to make it shake.

The ring part will have some inertia that is hard to cancel out, but I will make it pretty light.

What do you think about this picture about solenoid placement, does it work like that? :D If the solenoids with the arrows drawn are pulling, they make the ring rotate.
But when they are kinda mirrored on opposite sides, solenoids will become to a hard stop at the same time, maybe that will cancel something out? Like in 4cyl engine, when 2 pistons are up, the other 2 are down.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20240917_080621 piirros.jpg
    IMG_20240917_080621 piirros.jpg
    692.6 KB · Views: 23

NiallerM

Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2024
Messages
62
Location
France
Format
4x5 Format
I have been thinking about this, if the shutter shake will be a problem. But this type of a shutter is known to cause minimal amount of shutter shake.

Being so far away from film, but also shutter leafs moving short distance and moving symmetrically, cancelling out some forces. Shutter and lenses will be so heavy that it will need a lot of force to make it shake.

The ring part will have some inertia that is hard to cancel out, but I will make it pretty light.

What do you think about this picture about solenoid placement, does it work like that? :D If the solenoids with the arrows drawn are pulling, they make the ring rotate.
But when they are kinda mirrored on opposite sides, solenoids will become to a hard stop at the same time, maybe that will cancel something out? Like in 4cyl engine, when 2 pistons are up, the other 2 are down.

My worry would be that sudden stop. It might need dampening. You really have me thinking about this "simple" problem. It's a doozy!

I'm reminded of a camera that was given to me as an attic gift a few years ago. It was a Pentax P50 (A P5 in the US, I think). It was a cheapish SLR with similar function to the Canon AE-1. For a cheap camera, it took (and takes) absolutely superb photos. That thing has a recoil, though. Thankfully, it comes from the mirror slapping back into place, so its work is done and dusted by then. That was behind my suggestion of a curtain and a hand-cocked aperture. All the commotion will happen after the light has reached the plate. Light is faster than a compressive wave, after all.

I've had other thoughts too. Polarising filters?

It's a toughie.
 
OP
OP
Joined
Feb 26, 2024
Messages
54
Location
Finland
Format
Multi Format
My worry would be that sudden stop. It might need dampening. You really have me thinking about this "simple" problem. It's a doozy!

I'm reminded of a camera that was given to me as an attic gift a few years ago. It was a Pentax P50 (A P5 in the US, I think). It was a cheapish SLR with similar function to the Canon AE-1. For a cheap camera, it took (and takes) absolutely superb photos. That thing has a recoil, though. Thankfully, it comes from the mirror slapping back into place, so its work is done and dusted by then. That was behind my suggestion of a curtain and a hand-cocked aperture. All the commotion will happen after the light has reached the plate. Light is faster than a compressive wave, after all.

I've had other thoughts too. Polarising filters?

It's a toughie.
About the pentax camera, for sure, isnt it more about the lens and film used, hehe. Okay! you mean darkening with polarising filters, I wonder if anyone has tried that. Its not going to be completely dark or transparent tho.
 
OP
OP
Joined
Feb 26, 2024
Messages
54
Location
Finland
Format
Multi Format
I have been making a mount from an old brake disk, to get the ring part to a lathe. Its coming out pretty all right so far. Ring has lost over half of its weight already and more is still coming off.

But I have been thinking big thoughts! If the ring design is the best after all.. If it needs 4 solenoids, or 2 push/pull voice coil type actuators.


Would it be better if each of the 5 shutter leafs, would have its own push/pull voice coil type solenoid? :D Shutter would look like a ww2 era plane radial engine from front. Reversing polarity to all them with a single relay, would make it open/close.

It would have very small mass, single leaf weight only 10.9g, then connected to a small actuator with a rod. I bet it could go even higher shutter speed than with a ring design. And have no shutter shake issues. No ring's inertia to deal with. Only symmetrical forces acting similarly on 5 directions, within the 5 leafs and solenoids.

It would be pretty radical change of plans, lol.

That idea could also be adapted if the ring design is not good.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20240919_122524.jpg
    IMG_20240919_122524.jpg
    879.4 KB · Views: 32
  • IMG_20240919_181618.jpg
    IMG_20240919_181618.jpg
    461.5 KB · Views: 40

NiallerM

Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2024
Messages
62
Location
France
Format
4x5 Format
About the pentax camera, for sure, isnt it more about the lens and film used, hehe. Okay! you mean darkening with polarising filters, I wonder if anyone has tried that. Its not going to be completely dark or transparent tho.

Of course. Polarising filters will defeat the purpose. In fact, the better they are, the longer they'll push the exposure.
 
OP
OP
Joined
Feb 26, 2024
Messages
54
Location
Finland
Format
Multi Format
Okay I'll go with this ring style. Maybe if it doesnt work, the invidual solenoid drive leafs design may be worth doing.

Ring part now is 2.6mm thick, weights 130g. Thats exactly what I wanted. Got almost mirror finish straight out of lathe, as seen in first picture.

I took apart 2 car starter solenoids that was found from scrap. They seemed to be working still. They come much smaller and lighter when they were cut out of the steel casing and contact bits. Only coils left.
These seem to be powerful and take a lot of amps too :D Maybe I start with these and see if its working.

Next would be designing and making sand mold pieces for aluminium casting of the shutters frame, and when the 5mm pin material and reamer arrives, then finish off the ring.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20240922_152410.jpg
    IMG_20240922_152410.jpg
    203.1 KB · Views: 47
  • IMG_20240922_140727.jpg
    IMG_20240922_140727.jpg
    500.8 KB · Views: 70
  • IMG_20240922_134713__01.jpg
    IMG_20240922_134713__01.jpg
    697.7 KB · Views: 41
  • IMG_20240922_125732.jpg
    IMG_20240922_125732.jpg
    309.3 KB · Views: 45
  • IMG_20240921_090913.jpg
    IMG_20240921_090913.jpg
    276.7 KB · Views: 47
Joined
Jan 31, 2020
Messages
1,261
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
The idea with individual solenoids working in a radial direction sounds elegant. You could also study the Werra shutter which, I've read, closes without reversing direction of the ring travel. Or maybe I've misunderstanding, I dunno. Anyway your work so far looks great!
 

NiallerM

Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2024
Messages
62
Location
France
Format
4x5 Format
I have been making a mount from an old brake disk, to get the ring part to a lathe. Its coming out pretty all right so far. Ring has lost over half of its weight already and more is still coming off.

But I have been thinking big thoughts! If the ring design is the best after all.. If it needs 4 solenoids, or 2 push/pull voice coil type actuators.


Would it be better if each of the 5 shutter leafs, would have its own push/pull voice coil type solenoid? :D Shutter would look like a ww2 era plane radial engine from front. Reversing polarity to all them with a single relay, would make it open/close.

It would have very small mass, single leaf weight only 10.9g, then connected to a small actuator with a rod. I bet it could go even higher shutter speed than with a ring design. And have no shutter shake issues. No ring's inertia to deal with. Only symmetrical forces acting similarly on 5 directions, within the 5 leafs and solenoids.

It would be pretty radical change of plans, lol.

That idea could also be adapted if the ring design is not good.

Hey! If nothing else, you could end up with the most expensive cat flap ever made. Also the most dangerous! Imagine it with a proximity detector.

I jest. It looks like a monster, and I'm amazed at your work so far. Everything about it screamed "No way!" at me, so it is fascinating to see it take shape.
 
OP
OP
Joined
Feb 26, 2024
Messages
54
Location
Finland
Format
Multi Format
The idea with individual solenoids working in a radial direction sounds elegant. You could also study the Werra shutter which, I've read, closes without reversing direction of the ring travel. Or maybe I've misunderstanding, I dunno. Anyway your work so far looks great!
Hmm, i couldnt find any examples of Werra shutter with quick search. But maybe if the ring had a lobe for each leaf instead of slot, and each leaf would have some kind of return spring. Maybe then it could close without ring reversing.. hehe, just thinking how it could be done. Thank you!
 
OP
OP
Joined
Feb 26, 2024
Messages
54
Location
Finland
Format
Multi Format
Hey! If nothing else, you could end up with the most expensive cat flap ever made. Also the most dangerous! Imagine it with a proximity detector.

I jest. It looks like a monster, and I'm amazed at your work so far. Everything about it screamed "No way!" at me, so it is fascinating to see it take shape.
Thank you! Lol that cat comment :D It could look like some scifi space ship air lock door thingy.
I try to get this ready and moving, but it remains to be seen if its possible to made go 1/30s and not shake the camera too much.
 
OP
OP
Joined
Feb 26, 2024
Messages
54
Location
Finland
Format
Multi Format
Here is some progress, with the ring part I searched the center point, marked the leaf drive pin hole locations, every 72 degrees. Then 4mm holes were drilled, and the part could be attached to lathe from those holes (second pic).
There inner surface is machined to be perfectly round, because it had gone 0.2mm out of round from all the welding mountings and machining earlier. Now its ready for trimming outer shapes and riveting the pins to it.

The wooden box with 2 halves and locating pins, is made for sand casting the shutter frame out of aluminium.

In last pic, box is ready and there is parts that's going to be the wooden model, that will be used for the mold making and casting.

Its pretty bulky because I want to have good amount of material when machining the aluminium piece. It helps with attachment to lathe, room for defects in casting etc..
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20240927_135431.jpg
    IMG_20240927_135431.jpg
    494.3 KB · Views: 28
  • IMG_20241001_185712.jpg
    IMG_20241001_185712.jpg
    437.6 KB · Views: 30
  • IMG_20241004_123442.jpg
    IMG_20241004_123442.jpg
    525.1 KB · Views: 29
  • IMG_20241004_201451.jpg
    IMG_20241004_201451.jpg
    516.6 KB · Views: 27

NiallerM

Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2024
Messages
62
Location
France
Format
4x5 Format
Here is some progress, with the ring part I searched the center point, marked the leaf drive pin hole locations, every 72 degrees. Then 4mm holes were drilled, and the part could be attached to lathe from those holes (second pic).
There inner surface is machined to be perfectly round, because it had gone 0.2mm out of round from all the welding mountings and machining earlier. Now its ready for trimming outer shapes and riveting the pins to it.

The wooden box with 2 halves and locating pins, is made for sand casting the shutter frame out of aluminium.

In last pic, box is ready and there is parts that's going to be the wooden model, that will be used for the mold making and casting.

Its pretty bulky because I want to have good amount of material when machining the aluminium piece. It helps with attachment to lathe, room for defects in casting etc..

Just wow.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom