Budget SLR decision ?

[CGW]

Mechanical bodies can almost always be fixed. In the worst case, a good technician can always manufacture a part, not that machanical cameras often need new parts. It's electronic and "newer" cameras that need entire proprietary modules replaced (therefore being 100% dependant on original spares) when something goes wrong.

Problem is finding competent repairs for any type of camera. Techs "making" parts is a bit of a fantasy outside a handful of specialists catering to luxury brands. Supplies of purely mechanical cameras are obviously shrinking due to age. Battery-dependent 35mm SLRs are thick on the ground now and usually cheap--so cheap that busted ones get pitched and replaced with another.

 

[Peter Simpson]

I would look at KEH's bargain bin; aka "as-is". I got a Nikon FE2 and a Nikon FM2n for $40 each. Keep checking back. The stuff in the as-is section changes daily. I would recommend KEH "as-is" as being miles ahead of eBay in accuracy of description and value for money, which is to say "forget eBay".

 

[John Koehrer]

Oh I dunno,

Most levers can be fabricated pretty easily. Wouldn't want to attempt gears though. Plastic bits can sometimes be repaired if all the fragments are there.
Wouldn't do it for $$$ but the stuff I use myself.

 

[djacobox372]

I'd buy a nikon over an ae1. The ae1 is prone to shutter problems if it goes unused for a long time. I've purchased four ae1s and they all had slow shutters, I give up trying to find a working one.

Nikon seems a lot more reliable. I've purchased over 20 used nikon slrs and the only issues I've ever encountered are meters being slightly off or lcds bleeding or fading.

 

[Rol_Lei Nut]

H/G screens are focal length/aperture specific--really handy(?).

YMMV but I've never had any issues with MF lenses on AF bodies. I happily use the 45/2.8 Ai-P(you've tried one, right)on an N90s-- a near-perfect street rig for me.

Which is why I said my favourite viewfinder is a bit like an H screen "but better": A much finer grain and works perfectly with all lenses....

Again, there's no accounting for taste. I have tried the Nikkor 45mm f/2.8: a pretty standard Tessar clone, good but nothing to get excited about. For my taste, it's also too long...

A 35mm Summicron on a Leicaflex SL or an M6... Now there is a thing of beauty!!!
(as far as the OP is concerned, not quite budget, though not as expensive as urban legends and the uninformed make them out to be).

 

[Samuelg]

Wow thanks for all the replies you have helped a LOT im looking at ffordes and a used camera shop i just found near me, with regards AF thats not what im looking for i just dont like AF even on my DSLR i very rarely have it set to AF i like to be able to control what i want in focus

I do want a nice lens so i am looking into cheaper cameras with nicer lenses, re: CLAing i am fairly confident in my own skills when repairing things while i have repaired only a few cameras i have a 100% success rate doing it

when arguing electronic over fully manual i am totally a manual lover with the exception of a lightmeter which i do like to save me having to carry my Ikonphoto light meter with me

thanks for all your help with any luck i shall be photoing a few days after pay day comes around

kind regards
samuel

 

[Steve Smith]

Girls were attracted to my silver OM-1n like moths to a flame.

This has reminded me of a line by Humphrey Lyttelton on the BBC Radio Four programme, I'm Sorry, I haven't a clue.

Whilst introducing a contestant he remarked "he attracts girls like bees around a magnet".


Steve.

 

[Gerald C Koch]

Personally i think they are poor choices, less reliable, too much electronics and auto functions.

I'd go for a Pentax Spotmatic II or F but if you want newer a KM, KX or smaller MX. I paid £25 for my Spotmatic F and it's mint Lenses are very plentiful at good prices.

Ian

I totally agree, the Pentax lenses are first rate. Another possiblity is the Nikon EM which allows the use of many Nikon lenses. I picked up one in mint condition for US $60 with a telephoto lens and camera bag.

I would avoid the Minolta SR/SRT series. These cameras use a fragile thread to connect the aperture ring to the cameras built in meter. The thread passes over several pulleys. Should it break the camera is useless and repair costs more than the camera. I was given one and was shocked by this poor design.

 

[John Koehrer]

I totally agree, the Pentax lenses are first rate. Another possiblity is the Nikon EM which allows the use of many Nikon lenses. I picked up one in mint condition for US $60 with a telephoto lens and camera bag.

I would avoid the Minolta SR/SRT series. These cameras use a fragile thread to connect the aperture ring to the cameras built in meter. The thread passes over several pulleys. Should it break the camera is useless and repair costs more than the camera. I was given one and was shocked by this poor design.

I'm not a fan of the SRT's either, but to be fair. the technology at the time still used discrete components for the meter. I've never seen a broken string where something hasn't been forced.

FWIW the Canon AE-1 used a tungsten wire to connect elements on one side of the camera to the other. People have even broken those and they are tough.

Olympus used thread in either the OM-1 or OM-2 as a mechanical connection to the meter.

 

[Diapositivo]

A am not a repairer, as a layman I suppose a thread-pulley mechanism is very common wherever there is a following needle. The aperture ring, the shutter knob and the ASA knob each operate a pulley and move the following needle. If the groove of the pulley is deep enough I guess it is very, very difficult to dislodge the thread from a pulley. The thread has no workload and so it should not break easily, the design is probably sturdier than it looks, unless the thread is a rubber one, which could fail with time. If the thread is an ordinary silk or nylon thread, I would deem the entire mechanism quite dependable, as it needs no lubrication. The only thing that could make it fail is a knock so hard to dislodge a pulley, but that knock would dislodge pretty much anything, I suppose.

 

[Chan Tran]

I would avoid the Minolta SR/SRT series. These cameras use a fragile thread to connect the aperture ring to the cameras built in meter. The thread passes over several pulleys. Should it break the camera is useless and repair costs more than the camera. I was given one and was shocked by this poor design.[/QUOTE]

Many cameras do use pulleys and thread. In fact the Nikon FM uses pulley and thread to set the shutter speed. However, if the meter on the SRT goes dead it's small lost as I have used serveral SRT and although the meters are ok I never use the meter. Just estimate the exposure, Worked very well.

 

[jbbooks]

Look at a re-conditioned (still in warranty) Canon Elan 7e. I bought one, since it seemed to offer more features for less money than anything else and it is amazing the value for money it represents. It has not given me any trouble, can be used without regard for all the options for the mindless and will allow use with my Contax lenses using an adapter (manual focus and exposure only, of course). And, stacking another adapter on that adapter, it will allow its use with my Hasselblad lenses, as well. Also, it just happens to allow using all my Canon EOS lenses, too, with full automatic everything, including fast focusing on whatever it is that you are looking at through the viewfinder.

 

[Sirius Glass]

I would avoid the Minolta SR/SRT series. These cameras use a fragile thread to connect the aperture ring to the cameras built in meter. The thread passes over several pulleys. Should it break the camera is useless and repair costs more than the camera. I was given one and was shocked by this poor design.

Many cameras do use pulleys and thread. In fact the Nikon FM uses pulley and thread to set the shutter speed. However, if the meter on the SRT goes dead it's small lost as I have used serveral SRT and although the meters are ok I never use the meter. Just estimate the exposure, Worked very well.[/QUOTE]

I heavily used Minolta SRTs starting with the SR-7 for forty years and I never had a problem with the cables. I did send every one of those cameras in for a CLA every year or two, just as I would with any other camera. The cameras never came back with comments about the cables or any cable problem. I would not have a problem buying and heavily using a Minolta, Canon or Nikon camera.

Steve