APUG ?

Water from the Mountain

A
Water from the Mountain

  • 2
  • 0
  • 17
Rijksmuseum Amsterdam

A
Rijksmuseum Amsterdam

  • 0
  • 0
  • 21
Lotus

A
Lotus

  • 3
  • 0
  • 38
Magpies

A
Magpies

  • 4
  • 0
  • 75
Abermaw woods

A
Abermaw woods

  • 5
  • 0
  • 72

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
197,520
Messages
2,760,474
Members
99,393
Latest member
sundaesonder
Recent bookmarks
0

kevin klein

Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2006
Messages
194
Format
Large Format
Have'nt been here for a while. What happened to the APUG title?
 

Alan9940

Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2006
Messages
2,380
Location
Arizona
Format
Multi Format
Only Sean would know all the details, but APUG and DPUG morphed into Photrio.
 

Eric Rose

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2002
Messages
6,841
Location
T3A5V4
Format
Multi Format
Like the dinosaurs it was time to either evolve or die. We chose to evolve and bring all photographic image makers under the tent. Welcome back!
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
Apug somehow vanished, only remaining in the hearts of the stubborn...

Not to miss something anlogue one now has to enable both "analog" and "hybrid" at ones preference settings.
 

Wayne

Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2005
Messages
3,583
Location
USA
Format
Large Format
Have'nt been here for a while. What happened to the APUG title?

Surprise! We knew the site was going to change to include digital but the dropping of the APUG name for the analog section was an executive decision mentioned after the fact. Not looking to rehash that issue, just reporting the facts. On the bright side, in the spirit of modernity and inclusivity its now OK to deride the "stubborn" "dinosaurs" who were less pleased about it. Its all discussed here somewhere but not worth looking up. It is what it is.
 

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,482
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
Why people think destroying a film/darkroom site with non-film discussion is a good thing is beyond me. However, the forum software still works pretty good at filtering non-film related topics. Still it is amazing that people post on this site with disrespect to film users.
 

Helios 1984

Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2015
Messages
1,844
Location
Saint-Constant, Québec
Format
35mm
Hello, time traveller, let me inform you of the latest news:

- You can post about scanners & hybrid workflow,
- Non-subscribers can see what's in the media section.
- Ektachrome is back.
- Acros is gone.
- There's rumors about a Kodachrome revival.
- Sirius still refuse to share his work.
- The Chat is as crowded as Chernobyl.

Welcome back to Photrio.
 

macfred

Subscriber
Joined
Nov 6, 2014
Messages
3,839
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
Hello, time traveller, let me inform you of the latest news:

- You can post about scanners & hybrid workflow,
- Non-subscribers can see what's in the media section.
- Ektachrome is back.
- Acros is gone.
- There's rumors about a Kodachrome revival.
- Sirius still refuse to share his work.
- The Chat is as crowded as Chernobyl.

Welcome back to Photrio.

---

- And we have shirts and hats and a mug in the shop !

- Sirius still refuse to share his work.
- Sirius just posted a 'lomo-style' photograph of his girlfriends fridge ...
 

faberryman

Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2016
Messages
6,048
Location
Wherever
Format
Multi Format
Why people think destroying a film/darkroom site with non-film discussion is a good thing is beyond me. However, the forum software still works pretty good at filtering non-film related topics. Still it is amazing that people post on this site with disrespect to film users.
Contrary to the views of some, the site is not being destroyed. Participation has actually increased. And since the site has evolved to allow hybrid and digital discussion, no disrespect is shown film users by posting such topics .If you click on Today's Posts at the moment, of the 59 threads displayed, only one is hybrid and none are digital. If you don't want to see the hybrid or digital threads, you can choose to make them invisible. Of course the whining by film users continues unabated, so that aspect of the site hasn't changed either. Same old, same old.
 
Last edited:

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,833
Format
Hybrid
hey kevin !
great to see you found the site again ( with the different name and all, thankfully the apug.org popcorn trail still works :smile: )
now you can post a inverted paper negative or film scan and not have an angry mob with pitchforks and torches surround you
with claiming only print scans are allowed in the gallery. :whistling:

"surrender dorothy ! "

john
 

Helios 1984

Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2015
Messages
1,844
Location
Saint-Constant, Québec
Format
35mm
- Sirius just posted a 'lomo-style' photograph of his girlfriends fridge ...

We should ask Sean to make a T-shirt about this "When I was young, Sirius posted a photograph"
 

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,833
Format
Hybrid
We should ask Sean to make a T-shirt about this "When I was young, Sirius posted a photograph"

you might not have been here back when the rocks were soft
but he posted some sort of off road photograph of his pals? winching their jeep up a dirt/sand mound ...
and he removed it and stopped posting to the site because the image was used without his consent and posted on more than 200 websites ..
the image was posed in a thread where he mentioned he does off road photography for a store in exchange for parts for his rig... (IRRC)
indeed a rare treat to see mr glass' images even if they show expired food and other foods that don't need to be refrigerated ... in the fridge ..
he does need a better instagram filter, maybe some mouse ears on the eggs and cat wiskers on the milk ..
and a wee bit more posterization !
 
Last edited:

removedacct1

Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2014
Messages
1,875
Location
97333
Format
Large Format
Why people think destroying a film/darkroom site with non-film discussion is a good thing is beyond me. However, the forum software still works pretty good at filtering non-film related topics. Still it is amazing that people post on this site with disrespect to film users.

It is beyond me that there are those who believe making this an INCLUSIVE photography environment is somehow "destroying" the darkroom-oriented aspects of the site. How is this a "disrespect to film users"???! Its that kind of prejudice that causes measurable damage to the site. Nobody is making the digital/hybrid components mandatory viewing!
 

Theo Sulphate

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
6,489
Location
Gig Harbor
Format
Multi Format
Originally I had selected Analog-only for viewing and during that time I was under the impression that the Hybrid and Digital posts were where the majority of the discussion was occurring. However, based on comments of others, I enabled all three categories and have been totally surprised how very few posts there are in the Digital and Hybrid categories.
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,146
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Originally I had selected Analog-only for viewing and during that time I was under the impression that the Hybrid and Digital posts were where the majority of the discussion was occurring. However, based on comments of others, I enabled all three categories and have been totally surprised how very few posts there are in the Digital and Hybrid categories.

Yes, that allowed me to get my fingers dirty doing digital work as seen in my first selfie. If you want to get your hands dirty with digital feel free to just dig in.
 

pentaxuser

Member
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
19,621
Location
Daventry, No
Format
35mm
However, based on comments of others, I enabled all three categories and have been totally surprised how very few posts there are in the Digital and Hybrid categories.
There does seem to be more and more posts in which the users are film plus scanning rather than film plus darkroom work?. Certainly most pictures in the Gallery are scanned from negatives rather than prints. Maybe back in the "old days" of say 2003 - 2005 this was also the case?

pentaxuser
 

removed account4

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 21, 2003
Messages
29,833
Format
Hybrid
There does seem to be more and more posts in which the users are film plus scanning rather than film plus darkroom work?. Certainly most pictures in the Gallery are scanned from negatives rather than prints. Maybe back in the "old days" of say 2003 - 2005 this was also the case?

pentaxuser

meh not really ... its the same amount ... and since the beginning
 

Wayne

Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2005
Messages
3,583
Location
USA
Format
Large Format
Originally I had selected Analog-only for viewing and during that time I was under the impression that the Hybrid and Digital posts were where the majority of the discussion was occurring. However, based on comments of others, I enabled all three categories and have been totally surprised how very few posts there are in the Digital and Hybrid categories.

The rationale for absorbing APUG into Photrio was that it needed the digital side to "support it" so that it could survive. Photrio as surrogate mother to carry the ailing, demanding APUG fetus to full term. I'm compelled to predict then, based on low digital use, that a miscarriage fatal to mother and child is our fate. Of course we're probably still in the first trimester, so maybe thats premature.
 

markjwyatt

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 26, 2018
Messages
2,414
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Hello, time traveller, let me inform you of the latest news:


- Acros is gone.

Acros is not gone. I am shooting Acros. I am also shooting FP4 because Acros will be gone in a couple of rolls...
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom