PhotoJim
Member
How did this post add value to this thread?
See: the thread on civility.
Seriously, instead of just calling someone a liar, maybe you could give some evidence.
How did this post add value to this thread?
See: the thread on civility.
Seriously, instead of just calling someone a liar, maybe you could give some evidence.
How did this post add value to this thread?
See: the thread on civility.
Seriously, instead of just calling someone a liar, maybe you could give some evidence.
But I went up some dirt road I never went up before and that yielded some old combines and threshers and other farm implements that appear to be from around the turn of the century, left to rot slowly. These combines were made mostly from wood.
Maybe next time I will get bold with this stand development. I just couldn't this time because I actually wanted to print these negs and so I relied on known objective and published data.
I went up some dirt road I never went up before and that yielded some old combines and threshers and other farm implements that appear to be from around the turn of the century, left to rot slowly.
Hey Jim, how's it going? Haven't run into you in late night chats for some time. Anyway... I digress to the topic. Actually, if the evidence is to not stand develop by providing non-stand developed negs, he did provide some evidence of that by providing a link to his website where you can view all kinds of images in his own portfolio. He even posted one of them here in this thread. On the other hand, (and this isn't to knock the other fellows who claim stand development is appropriate for Pan F) the other fellows don't have any online examples that I can find, whether on APUG or elsewhere. I was naturally curious to see what this other method was all about by looking at end results. I was trying to wrap my mind around why letting the chemistry just sit would make better as it just seems incorrect all ways up and down and sideways and backwards and forwards from what I know by experience. All that to say I can't find the end results of stand developed negatives being superior, at least by the promoters of it in this thread.
Anyway, I'm not saying that "bs" added value.
Because I chooose not to present my work on APUG does not preclude the validity of my argument.
I don't present work flows I have not tested. Try it, ignore it, do whatever you wish to with the information offered. Just don't tear down something you don't understand. I have spent a fair amount of time testing PanF with Rodinal in stand development. It has certain attributes of which I have tried to describe.
Good day.
tim in san jose
And what sort of scenes are the ones where stand development is most effective? I assume ones with large contrast ranges.
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |