actual negative dimensions

Palouse 3.jpg

H
Palouse 3.jpg

  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Marooned On A Bloom

A
Marooned On A Bloom

  • 0
  • 0
  • 5
Curious Family Next Door

A
Curious Family Next Door

  • 2
  • 0
  • 14
spain

A
spain

  • 1
  • 0
  • 63

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,428
Messages
2,774,827
Members
99,612
Latest member
Renato Donelli
Recent bookmarks
0

Arklatexian

Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2014
Messages
1,777
Location
Shreveport,
Format
Multi Format
4x5 film is NOT 4"x5" ...
that was the size of the PLATE when
dry plates were sold.
when sheet film began to be sold
little metal septums were sold
to convert plate holders to sheet film holders.
film was about 1/16 smaller than the plate to fit in the holder ...

when plates stopped being popular, and film became king
it was still sold the same size... and photographers didn't have
to dump all the old film/plate holders to buy new different sized ones ...

this goes for other sheet film sizes too.
Well, that is one version! I have used 2 different 4x5 films and. neither were glass plates. One was the size of the sheet film that came from the manufacturer for you to put in your film holders. The other size came from film packs and were larger. The situation was the same for 2 1/4 x 3 1/4 films except there was a third size, those negatives that came from 120/620 roll film. Most enlarger manufacturers made negative holders in the different sizes. That was in the "golden age of photography that some of this group talks about.........Regards!
 

wiltw

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 4, 2008
Messages
6,431
Location
SF Bay area
Format
Multi Format
To be precise
  • the Bronica ETRS image area is 42.5 x 55.1mm
  • the Mamiya 645 image area is 41.5 x 56mm,
  • the Pentax 645 image area is 41.5 x 56mm,
  • the Hassy image area is 56 x 56mm
  • the Mamiya RB67 image area is 56 x 69.5mm
  • my Regal 4x5 film holder exposes an image area of 96 x 120mm
  • my Kodak Readyload 4x5 holder exposes an image area of 92.5 x 118mm
  • my Polaroid 4x5 holder exposes an image area of 95 x 120mm
... Tmax sheetfilm measures 99.5mm(3.918") x 125.3mm(4.934") and Ilford HP5 measures 101.6 x 127mm, and Kodak Portra 160 measures 101.6 x 127mm, so 4x5 is only a figurative name
 
Last edited:

Barry Kirsten

Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2014
Messages
68
Location
Brookfield, Vic. Au.
Format
Multi Format
Yikes! Hard to believe all this, and for what logical reason? Regarding the RB67, a camera I've long been interested in but never owned, is that the rollfilm negative sizing or the sheet film negative sizing?. If so it should rightly be sold as a 6x9 camera. I have several Fidelity 21/4x31/4 holders for the RB67 and the negative area of those is 54x79.
 

Dan Fromm

Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Messages
6,812
Format
Multi Format
Barry, 56 x 69.5 isn't quite 56 x 79. There's no real 6x9 or 2x3 standard, gate lengths of commonly used 2x3/6.9 roll holders range from 78 mm (Graflex with pin rollers at the end of the gate) to 82 mm.
 

coa_lund

Member
Joined
May 4, 2010
Messages
17
Location
Sweden
Format
Multi Format
To be precise
  • the Bronica ETRS image area is 42.5 x 55.1mm
  • the Mamiya 645 image area is 41.5 x 56mm,
  • the Pentax 645 image area is 41.5 x 56mm,
  • the Hassy image area is 56 x 56mm
  • the Mamiya RB67 image area is 56 x 69.5mm
  • my Regal 4x5 film holder exposes an image area of 96 x 120mm
  • my Kodak Readyload 4x5 holder exposes an image area of 92.5 x 118mm
  • my Polaroid 4x5 holder exposes an image area of 95 x 120mm
... Tmax sheetfilm measures 99.5mm(3.918") x 125.3mm(4.934") and Ilford HP5 measures 101.6 x 127mm, and Kodak Portra 160 measures 101.6 x 127mm, so 4x5 is only a figurative name
I have 6 Hasselblad 6x6 filmbacks, with year codes TH (62), TP (62) (bought new in 1964), UH (72), two UU (77) and one EE (99). The all have an image area of about 55x55 mm, not 56x56mm, wich is good since I then can get the black border when I scan with Nikkon Coolscan which scans 59.9 mm wide. As an example below an old image exposed in TH62861, when I remove the black borders thi image is 54.7x55.3 mm.
 

Attachments

  • 66ba403.jpg
    66ba403.jpg
    990.2 KB · Views: 80

NJH

Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2013
Messages
702
Location
Dorset
Format
Multi Format
An interesting tidbit. People often said that 6x7 was ideal for common print formats, however as stated above the 55.1mm x 42.5mm of the Bronica ETRS system is very close to the 14x11 print ratio and therefore a pretty optimal film image size for what I believe would be a very nice enlargement size, not to big but big enough for many.
 

wiltw

Subscriber
Joined
Oct 4, 2008
Messages
6,431
Location
SF Bay area
Format
Multi Format
I have 6 Hasselblad 6x6 filmbacks, with year codes TH (62), TP (62) (bought new in 1964), UH (72), two UU (77) and one EE (99). The all have an image area of about 55x55 mm, not 56x56mm, wich is good since I then can get the black border when I scan with Nikkon Coolscan which scans 59.9 mm wide. As an example below an old image exposed in TH62861, when I remove the black borders thi image is 54.7x55.3 mm.

Thx for the correction. In just reviewing the A12 user manual, Hasselblad says only "2-1/4 x 2-1/4 " which is 57mm x 57mm !
Then I referred to Ernst Wildi, who was a spokesperson for Hasselblad for many, many years, and a published author on the topic, who stated, "The exact image size is 54 x 54 mm, with 12 images on one roll of 120 fi lm and 24 on the 220 type. " but in his earlier book states, "55 x 55mm" Go figure.

In also looking up Bronica SQ, it says "55.6mm x 55.6mm"
 
Last edited:

Bud Hamblen

Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2017
Messages
117
Location
Nashville, TN
Format
Multi Format
The Eastman Kodak Company's No. 2 Brownie, the camera that 120 film was first made for, took a 2-1/4 in. by 3-1/4 in. picture (57 mm by 83 mm)
 

RalphLambrecht

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 19, 2003
Messages
14,631
Location
K,Germany
Format
Medium Format
What are the actual dimensions of 6x4.5 negatives?

I also wonder what the actual dimensions are for 6x6 format and 4x5 format.

Thanks.

Alan
It depends a little bit on the camera brand but, it is typical for a MF negative 6 by x to be 56mm in width.
 

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,529
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
What are the actual dimensions of 6x4.5 negatives?

I also wonder what the actual dimensions are for 6x6 format and 4x5 format.

Thanks.

Alan

You have to measure it. There can be variability in the image frame between even cameras of the same type.


(389) Such markings, however, will remain on the negative
and any uncropped prints. Because these markings on inexpensive
cameras tend to be distributed in a random pattern unique to each
camera, they serve as identifiers for determining whether a
particular negative or uncropped photograph was originally
exposed in any particular camera.

(391) In order to determine the pattern of these camera
signatures the case of Lee Harvey Oswald's Imperial Reflex camera,
test photographs were made with it and then intentionally
underexposed in development to show the frame edge markings
better. (No special development method was necessary to bring out
the camera scratch mark pattern.)

(395) This analysis established that the Oswald backyard
pictures had been exposed in Oswald's Imperial Reflex camera.
Volume VI of the HOUSE SELECT COMMITTEE
ON ASSASSINATIONS
 
Last edited:
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom