Roger, where have you been?
ECN and ECP are used around the world as the last existing high quality motion picture stock!
It is processed in nearly every country in the world, and certainly on every continent!
PE
Perhaps they instinctively realize that sometimes a little more pain is good for the soul.
"We choose to go to the Moon in this decade and do the other things...
Roger, where have you been?
ECN and ECP are used around the world as the last existing high quality motion picture stock!
But it is Not common (any more) in 8mm, and with the exception of a VERY FEW labs (who are quite likly doing some of their own conversion and perforation of the stock) places - No one will make a super 8 print from a Super 8 ECN original. (which is mostly used in a computer video flow) likewise regular 8 ecn never officially appeared, and ECP in regular 8 was generally exclusively for the commercially filmed Home movie market. (castle films and friends).
even in 16mm only a relatively small number of the available labs will make a 16mm print from a 16mm camera original as a standard service.
You cannot easily make good RA4 prints from ECN.
PE
Consumer and amateurs are not the intended market if some of them buy it great if not who cares. The target market is filmschools and Super8mm is way cheaper than 16mm but still teaches you the discipline and vocabulary that is necessary to work in the mp industry.
You cannot easily make good RA4 prints from ECN.
PE
Roger, where have you been?
ECN and ECP are used around the world as the last existing high quality motion picture stock!
It is processed in nearly every country in the world, and certainly on every continent!
Try not to laugh too hard at my stupid question: what is the difference between a positive film and a reversal film?
It seems to me that if I want to shoot 16mm, have it developed, and project the results, my only choice is Tri-X reversal. Anything else (such as color) involves copying from negative film, right?
How will Kodak get around the US restriction on "processing-included" bundles?
The movie industry has always used Negative / positive for productions that are shown to a lot of folks. no mater if for a theatre or the "industrial" films that used to be common in training and marketing, one negative and many copies.
"Home" movies where their was only one or two copies expected to be made were almost always done on reversal film - and this was the main forte of Kodachrome.
...
OT, but how come no one can make speeches like that any more?????
Because we don't think like that anymore.
There was a time when challenges were relished. No more. Today we run from them. For the young, if it can't happen in an Internet moment, then their attention spans are exceeded. And for the old, they are too set in their past comfortable ways to even begin to risk new ways of thinking. Youth is unmotivated by change, and age is terrified by it.
Ken
But strange enough at their website Kodak list their annonced S-8 camera at the "Consumer" register, not at the "Commercial>Motion Picture" register, where in the past anything cinematographic was listed, including S-8.
Not taking into account human nature is the root cause of lots of unresolved arguments on APUG.
Ken
Interesting, but I would have thought that there are numerous second-hand super-8 cameras already about at quite reasonable prices, some from very high quality makers, for those who are interested.
How will Kodak get around the US restriction on "processing-included" bundles?
Thanks Matt. I didn't realize the restriction no longer exists.The consent decree that limited "processing included" Kodachrome was allowed to lapse/cancelled by the anti-trust authorities when it became moot...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?