4x5 field camera

[_T_]

I also have a Cambo SC 4x5 monorail and recommend it. I keep the short 12 inch rail and the bag bellows on the camera to make it compact. Unless you are shooting with very long lenses, the bag bellows works fine with wide to medium-long lenses. Frankly, I tend to shoot only with the Nikon 90mm f4.5, but a 210 will work equally well.

Another plus is they are plentiful, the accessories are easy to find and relatively inexpensive.

That’s funny I do the exact same thing. I really only break out the long rail and bellows for macro stuff anymore. I really like not getting jabbed in the chest by the 54cm rail.

There’s a 12” rail available on b&h right now for like $20 or something if anyone is looking for one. I payed way more for mine.

 

[abruzzi]

IMO, the important difference between the Linhof Technikardan and the Toyo VX125, is that on the Technikardan, you can change the bellows. As far as I know, the Toyo VX125 has a non-interchangeable bellows.

actually, I'm pretty sure the VX125 has interchangable bellows. I've never used one but I've seen them with pleated bellows, bag bellows and no bellows, so I suspect they are interchangable. I do know that the vx125 has geared rise/fall and shift, while the TK is sliding with friction lock. I also know the TK will extend out to around 450mm with the standard rail and I don't think the vx125 gets close to that. Both seem to be very nice cameras, but of the two I only have experience with the TK.

 

[Besk]

For the record, the Toyo VX125 takes all of the bellows, rails, lensboards, backs etc that are used on the normal Toyo monorail view cameras. (I currently have one.)

 

[Kino]

That’s funny I do the exact same thing. I really only break out the long rail and bellows for macro stuff anymore. I really like not getting jabbed in the chest by the 54cm rail.

There’s a 12” rail available on b&h right now for like $20 or something if anyone is looking for one. I payed way more for mine.

You can even 3D print your own short rail:

https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:6652294

 

[abruzzi]

My issue with the Cambo as a field camera it that it is hard to make compact. The usual approach is to disconnect the bellows and swing both standards 90 degrees. This makes the entire package large but flat. Problem is I don't really have any bags that accomodate a camera like that. If that works for you, though, its a pretty nice, and rigid camera that sells for very cheap. it will also probably have issues with lenses shorter than 75mm because the standards can get close enough to focus infinity. That can be worked around by swinging the rear standard 180 degrees but then I believe the film holder needs to be inserted from the top because the rise/fall rails are in the way.

(FYI, I have no experience with the Cambo 4x5, but I do own a Cambo 2x3 that has the above issues, and most of the parts are the same. Not going wider than 75mm on a 2x3 camera is more of an issue.)

 

[Kino]

My issue with the Cambo as a field camera it that it is hard to make compact. The usual approach is to disconnect the bellows and swing both standards 90 degrees. This makes the entire package large but flat. Problem is I don't really have any bags that accomodate a camera like that. If that works for you, though, its a pretty nice, and rigid camera that sells for very cheap. it will also probably have issues with lenses shorter than 75mm because the standards can get close enough to focus infinity. That can be worked around by swinging the rear standard 180 degrees but then I believe the film holder needs to be inserted from the top because the rise/fall rails are in the way.

(FYI, I have no experience with the Cambo 4x5, but I do own a Cambo 2x3 that has the above issues, and most of the parts are the same. Not going wider than 75mm on a 2x3 camera is more of an issue.)

Yes, it all comes down to price vs features vs realistic expectations. The OP has to decide what factors are most important and even then, there will probably be compromises.

 

[B.S.Kumar]

There are some monorail cameras that can be reasonably compact - the Toyo D45M & VX125, Linhof Technikardan and Arca Swiss Oschwald type cameras come to mind.
For example, here are two photos showing the relative sizes of the Toyo D45M and 45A cameras.

Kumar

 

[Neil Poulsen]

I have both a Linhoff Technikarden (Japanese style) and a Deardorff 4x5 special with a Graflok back.

The Deardorff is design to raise that front standard. In addition, one can achieve an additional 1" rise using a vertical slider that's traditional on all Deardorff cameras of which I'm aware.

I tried taking a fairly reasonable architectural photo of a distant, tall structure from a fairly long distance. I had insufficient rise on the Deardoff to capture this image. I returned another day with the Technikarden rail camera and had not problem taking the photo.

My suggestion is that you not rely on a flat-bed camera for architectural photography. There are many reasonably priced rail cameras available. Go for one of those.

 

[abruzzi]

My suggestion is that you not rely on a flat-bed camera for architectural photography. There are many reasonably priced rail cameras available. Go for one of those.

There are also some reasonably compact rail cameras. They are not usually going to be as compact as a flatbed, but something like a Sinar F can be had cheap, and has a way to fold up that, while not tiny, is very manageable. Sinar cameras also have every imaginable accessory to turn it into just about anything you want. The Lunhof Technikardan, Toyo VX125 and later "Vogt era" Arca Swiss cameras (F-classic, F-metric) are very featureful, very compact, but are also not low budget cameras. If you can stretch your budget they are worth considering