• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

Standards when printing for an exhibition

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
204,295
Messages
2,866,775
Members
102,214
Latest member
AvGordon
Recent bookmarks
0
I wouldn't personally deal with any gallery which had the nerve to tell me how to frame my own work - that's part of the overall compositonal presention. I do it better anyway. From the first, I was complemented on my prints wearing the "proper suit and tie". But not everyone has the equipment and time for that, so many have to rely on professional frame shops; and the expense can add up fast. Not every gallery demands full framing; but realize that 'push pin' displayed prints are not well protected from damage. And I've seen a lot of work ruined in budget gallery installations.
 
I wouldn't personally deal with any gallery which had the nerve to tell me how to frame my own work - that's part of the overall compositonal presention. I do it better anyway. From the first, I was complemented on my prints wearing the "proper suit and tie". But not everyone has the equipment and time for that, so many have to rely on professional frame shops; and the expense can add up fast. Not every gallery demands full framing; but realize that 'push pin' displayed prints are not well protected from damage. And I've seen a lot of work ruined in budget gallery installations.

Framing is the single most expensive part of exhibiting for those starting out. My gallery is very small , the size of an art fair booth(this is on purpose) and we do have excellent north light but if the glass is not anti reflective it shows poorly on us and the photographer.
 
Framing is the single most expensive part of exhibiting for those starting out. My gallery is very small , the size of an art fair booth(this is on purpose) and we do have excellent north light but if the glass is not anti reflective it shows poorly on us and the photographer.

That is why I opt for cheap IKEA frames. You can put anti-glare plexiglass or glass in them if you want to splurge.
 
That is why I opt for cheap IKEA frames. You can put anti-glare plexiglass or glass in them if you want to splurge.

I guess it depends on the size of the gallery, the few times i had photos as part of an exhibit at the Whyte Museum of the Canadian Rockies, they supplied the frames.
 
I do not want to send anyone home with a print of mine that is not matted and framed as best as I can do. Solid frames, all archival materials, carefully cut windows, and all that is needed for as close to perfect presentation as I can get. I want the frame and window mat to add to the print, yet disappear.
 
I do not want to send anyone home with a print of mine that is not matted and framed as best as I can do. Solid frames, all archival materials, carefully cut windows, and all that is needed for as close to perfect presentation as I can get. I want the frame and window mat to add to the print, yet disappear.

Would you reframe if the frame is not to the client’s liking or decor?
 
Would you reframe if the frame is not to the client’s liking or decor?

Depending on the situation, I'd probably not sell it framed and let them handle it. The framing style is not a make-or-break issue, there is flexibility...I would trust them to pick something fitting to the work. After all, they had good enough taste to buy the photo! 😉

The gallery I work through does the same...either sell it in their standard frame or without a frame...but I supply the fully matted print. I never have had someone request different matting (always white, or a slightly off-white.)
 
Last edited:
Depending on the situation, I'd probably not sell it framed and let them handle it. The framing style is not a make-or-break issue, there is flexibility...I would trust them to pick something fitting to the work. After all, they had good enough taste to buy the photo! 😉

The gallery I work through does the same...either sell it in their standard frame or without a frame...but I supply the fully matted print. I never have had someone request different matting (always white, or a slightly off-white.)

Vaughn, I also don't sell raw prints, but only mounted & matted. At the same time big galleries like the Andrew Smith Gallery formerly of Santa Fe, now in Tucson.....does sell big $$ in a variety of ways.
But the initial post here was about someone preparing to exhibit.....
 
Vaughn, I also don't sell raw prints, but only mounted & matted. At the same time big galleries like the Andrew Smith Gallery formerly of Santa Fe, now in Tucson.....does sell big $$ in a variety of ways.
But the initial post here was about someone preparing to exhibit.....

And hopefully I gave some useful advise in that regard -- including a helpful question by Pieter bringing up the possibility of being asked to reframe a piece for a buyer. Something good for the OP to think about before being asked about it by a possible buyer.

But the OP basically just asked for common border sizes, how to mix formats in a single show, and should he work in cm or inches. Oh, and handling paper sizes for showing just unmounted prints.

I think we got most of that pretty well covered, plus as usual, a bit more. Still might be some good suggestions out there!
 
I have seen a lot of photo exibitions and there are really no rules. On one end among the simplest was someone who printed black and white prints from snapshop cameras on regular laser printer on an artist-run gallery. On the other there are large scale inkjet printed and framed inket prints that sells numbered and signed prints from works of world known photographers for price of 50000 USD pr print (for example David Bailey). On the latter the photographer doesnt seem to be so involved in the printing, itis handled by specialised companies that does this sort of thing. The artists gives the signature. Darkroom silver prints isnt common, I usually see that only in historical exhibitions or in photographers that are also committed to the printing process (such as Dag Alveng in norway, he is a master of large format process). Printing gives quite a large leeway for influencing the output, but there seems to be few contemporary photographers that does much out of it. Mastering darkroom printing doesnt seem to be much valuated in the artworld, most gallerists seems to be pretty green about the process and doesnt really understand the conceptual differences between an inkjet print, a lambda digital silver gelatin print, and a darkroom print from a negative.
One of the most impressive exhibitions from a well known star photographer, for example, was a retrospective by Anton Corbijn in Berlin. They displayed original lith-prints presumably made by Mike Spry, his long time printer that was a master of this process. They where great. It really opened my eyes for the process. Last year i saw another exhibition of Corbijn in Oslo, but they had none of the lith originals only what appeared as digital inkjet prints. I was dissapointed, it was meh.
 
Last edited:
I have seen a lot of photo exibitions and there are really no rules. On one end among the simplest was someone who printed black and white prints from snapshop cameras on regular laser printer on an artist-run gallery. On the other there are large scale inkjet printed and framed inket prints that sells numbered and signed prints from works of world known photographers for price of 50000 USD pr print (for example David Bailey). On the latter the photographer doesnt seem to be so involved in the printing, itis handled by specialised companies that does this sort of thing. The artists gives the signature. Darkroom silver prints isnt common, I usually see that only in historical exhibitions or in photographers that are also committed to the printing process (such as Dag Alveng in norway, he is a master of large format process). Printing gives quite a large leeway for influencing the output, but there seems to be few contemporary photographers that does much out of it. Mastering darkroom printing doesnt seem to be much valuated in the artworld, most gallerists seems to be pretty green about the process and doesnt really understand the conceptual differences between an inkjet print, a lambda digital silver gelatin print, and a darkroom print from a negative.
One of the most impressive exhibitions from a well known star photographer, for example, was a retrospective by Anton Corbijn in Berlin. They displayed original lith-prints presumably made by Mike Spry, his long time printer that was a master of this process. They where great. It really opened my eyes for the process. Last year i saw another exhibition of Corbijn in Oslo, but they had none of the lith originals only what appeared as digital inkjet prints. I was dissapointed, it was meh.

You had a great opportunity to see Mike Spry's original lith prints for Corbijn , not many have seen them. I wish a collection of them would come to Canada to see.
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom