For Sale Zeiss Distagon ZF lenses - 21mm f/2.8 and 35mm f/2.0

[bags27]

These are obviously in a Nikon F mount. Their reputation isexcellent but I wonder how the really compare to the original Nikon equivalents. Anybody in the know or compared them?

I own the 25, 50 (f/1.4, not the f/2 macro) and the 100 macro in Nikon mount. I sold the 28 which is a hit or miss amazing lens but too close to the 25 for my purposes

Much heavier (some would say "better build quality") than Nikon equivalents.
Optically, they have that modern Zeiss look: very, very sharp, more "pop" and more highly saturated. I'm getting mine out now for fall colors. With Portra 400, they dazzle.

There isn't a single lens in this whole lineup that isn't highly praised. The 135mm is sort of legendary but massive; the 21 and 35 are exceptionally strong. Weakest is my 50 f/1.4 which is--to put it kindly--"interpretative" wide open. But a lot cheaper than the 50 f/2 macro and just as good by f/2. Actually pretty wonderful at f/5.6 and f/8.

 

[Angarian]

These are obviously in a Nikon F mount. Their reputation isexcellent but I wonder how the really compare to the original Nikon equivalents. Anybody in the know or compared them?

Yes, we did some years ago in our local photographers group. As every member has lots of different lenses, such comparison tests are very educating, interesting and give fun, too.

The Zeiss 2/35 ZF is much better optically and mechanically compared to the Nikkor 2,8/35 AI-S, Nikkor 2/35 AI-S, Nikkor 2/35 AF-D and Nikkor 1.4/35 AI-S.
The Zeiss 2.8/21 ZF is significantly better optically and mechanically compared to the Nikkor 2.8/20 AI-S and 2.8/20 AF-D.

 

[JParker]

These are obviously in a Nikon F mount. Their reputation isexcellent but I wonder how the really compare to the original Nikon equivalents. Anybody in the know or compared them?

So far all Zeiss ZF / ZF.2 / Milvus lenses that I have used have performed much, much better than their equivalent Nikkor counterparts.
The advantages of the Zeiss lenses have been very clearly visible. Construction quality is also better.

Here a comparison of the Nikkor 1.8/50 AI-S (short barrel version) with the current Zeiss Milvus Distagon 1.4/50:


You will find almost all Nikkor and Zeiss lenses tested here:

Nikon / Nikkor Full Format Lens Tests / Reviews

OpticalLimits - Lens reviews and beyond!

photozone.de

and here:

- lenses reviews - LensTip.com

Best digital cameras and lens reviews. If you are looking for the information about digital cameras and lenses you are in a right place. We have many professional tests of digital photography equipment.

www.lenstip.com

- lenses reviews - LensTip.com

Best digital cameras and lens reviews. If you are looking for the information about digital cameras and lenses you are in a right place. We have many professional tests of digital photography equipment.

www.lenstip.com

 

[skahde]

I owned both of theses lenses after having used their different Nikon-equivalents (I will not start listing them all) for many years. It was my solution to the high demands of the Sensor of the Nikon D800E and the Zeiss-lenses delivered! Both are wonderful and I have a 1.2 m (4 feet) wide print from the 2/35 hanging just behind me. You cant go wrong with either one I think the pricing is very reasonable.

 

[Film-Niko]

I owned both of theses lenses after having used their different Nikon-equivalents (I will not start listing them all) for many years. It was my solution to the high demands of the Sensor of the Nikon D800E and the Zeiss-lenses delivered!......

You cant go wrong with either one I think the pricing is very reasonable.

I can completely agree.
Both lenses are excellent from my experience (on film and digital), and are surpassing their Nikkor counterparts / equivalent lenses by far. In their optical, and also mechanical performance. The better performance of the Zeiss lenses is very well visible and obvious.

Especially the newly designed lenses of the ZE / ZF / ZF.2 / Milvus lens programme (that means all except the classic Planar 1.4/50 and 1.4/85) are really a league of their own and surpassing the older Nikon Nikkor and Canon FD / EF lenses by a huge margin.
I had the chance to test many of them, and using some regularly because I own them.

And yes, the pricing of the two lenses here is indeed very fair.

 

[skahde]

If I remember correctly the 2/35 and 2.8/21 mm Distagons in my inventory existed in Contax/Yashica (and some more from the ZF/ZE-line). Of the 2.8/21 I read it was released as late as 1995, though.

 

[Film-Niko]

If I remember correctly the 2/35 and 2.8/21 mm Distagons in my inventory existed in Contax/Yashica (and some more from the ZF/ZE-line). Of the 2.8/21 I read it was released as late as 1995, though.

AFAIK also the 2/35 and 2,8/21mm Distagons has been improved compared to the former Zeiss/Contax lenses.
Here in post 13 there is a comparison of the MTF charts of the former Zeiss/Contax 2.8/21 to the current Zeiss 2.8/21 in Nikon F and Canon EF mount:

Z8 with Zeiss Milvus 21mm?

Curious if anyone has adapted the Zeiss Milvus 21mm on the Z8, and if so, what are your thoughts on the pair?

www.fredmiranda.com

 

[skahde]

That is good news, Zeiss keeps improving their products obviously.

 

[Milpool]

Bump.

 

[Milpool]

Bump.

 

[Milpool]

Bump

 

[Milpool]

Bump

 

[Milpool]

Bump.

 

[Milpool]

Bump.

 

[Milpool]

Bump

 

[Milpool]

...

 

[Milpool]

Bump

 

[Milpool]

Bump

 

[RalphLambrecht]

Please note these are ZF, not ZF.2

-Mint condition ie: perfect glass, no scratches, no dust, no dings etc.
-Original hood, caps and Zeiss test certificate included with each lens
-I am the original owner. Used only a handful of times by me. Meticulously handled and stored.

21mm S/N 15737605: $500 USD + shipping
35mm S/N 15660512: $400 USD + shipping

PayPal only, US currency.

View attachment 361474View attachment 361475View attachment 361476View attachment 361477View attachment 361478View attachment 361479View attachment 361480View attachment 361481

this is a Nikon F/AI mount, correct?

 

[Milpool]

this is a Nikon F/AI mount, correct?

F mount. I’m not an expert on the Nikon mounts but I bought these to use on my F3/F4.

 

[MartinCrabtree]

From what I can tell from images posted they're Ais.

 

[Franswa]

From what I can tell from images posted they're Ais.

That is correct. The portion that is carved into(dips down) the mount is a tell sign

 

[Milpool]

Bump.

 

[Milpool]

Bump.

 

[Milpool]

Bump.