Why would you buy expired 35mm film?
-
A
- Thread starter Taz777
- Start date
Recent Classifieds
-
For Sale Zone VI Development Timer and Newsletters
- Started by 2Dogs
-
Sold Nikon s2 with 50mm 1.4
- Started by Gram Nylén
-
Sold Fujifilm 4x5 Fujichrome Veliva 100 and Fujifilm 4x5 Fujichrome 64T. EXPIRED
- Started by Renato Tonelli
-
Sold Fujifilm Neopan 100 Acros 120 and 4x5
- Started by Renato Tonelli
Forum statistics
Gee. Expired film police. You buy what you want for your reasons and I'll do the same.
Amen, bro!
I used to buy expired films on eBay because it was less expensive but nowadays prices have skyrocketed to a point where I’m better off purchasing fresh stuff. Now, I go to the brick-and-mortar store whenever I need a few rolls. Although, I still buy films at the thriftstore, on the rare occasions something decent shows up on the shelves at a good price.
Last edited:
Do you remember when Maxi and Super-C grocery stores and Pharmaprix drugstores decided to dump all their film for pennies on the dollar? I still have some in my freezer!
As for mystery stored in the desert film from church bazaars, the best price I paid was 10¢ a roll of Konica. I still need to try it out.
Was it around 2018? I remember buying 12x 24 exp of Superia X-Tra 400 at Pharmaprix for 6$ per 3-pack. The cashier said to me "Nobody uses these anymore, it's for antiques"... I waited for the 36 rolls to be on discount but it never happened.
As for thrift store find, I haven't been lucky in a long while. My last find was a 400ft Kodak Vision2 16mm that expired somewhen in 2010, I got this one for 10 bucks. I have no idea what I'll do with this stuff, maybe get a Minolta-16? The stuff will go south long before I can finish the whole reel lol
Some time around 2010 the German drugstores blew out Ektar films for 1€, I am still having some of those. A bit later was the last batch of real Agfa apx100 in the drugstores, not crazy reduces but cheap enough and yeah, the last batch before it became the relabeled kentmere (?).
No, it was more around 2006.
I was really happy to be able to get some film for so little. The cheapest I got at the time was a few 8 roll packs of Gold 200 for 1$ at Super-C.
But the sad thing is that since they were dismantling the photo lab at Maxi, I couldn't get the girls to run special orders on their machines.
I'll sometimes try expired film if someone gives it to me, or if it's not too old take a chance on it at a greatly reduced price.
Recently someone gave me a box of 100 sheets of 4x5 Plus-X that expired in 1986. Slapped some into film holders and took some pictures in the back yard and they turned out great! Soup it in some homebrew D-23 and it's a dirt-cheap combination.
For 8x10 I sometimes use medical X-ray film to play around (not expired). Per exposure it's just as cheap per exposure as 35mm.
For important projects or costly travel however, I always bring fresh film.
Recently someone gave me a box of 100 sheets of 4x5 Plus-X that expired in 1986. Slapped some into film holders and took some pictures in the back yard and they turned out great! Soup it in some homebrew D-23 and it's a dirt-cheap combination.
For 8x10 I sometimes use medical X-ray film to play around (not expired). Per exposure it's just as cheap per exposure as 35mm.
For important projects or costly travel however, I always bring fresh film.
Last edited:
Andrew O'Neill
Moderator
I usually only buy expired films that are no longer produced...Like Plus-X, Verichrome Pan, Panatomic-X, and HIE, if I can find it. I will purchase expired LF film that is still in production. For example, I Recently purchased a bunch of expired 4x5 TMY-2 as the price was much better than if I had bought it new.
I reflexively buy Panatomic X and Verichrome if it's in front of me. but I really can't say why. Pulled TMAX looks the same as Panatomic and is a whole lot cheaper (these days). I guess it's the thrill of film as old as I am still working that makes it worthwhile.
Andrew O'Neill
Moderator
If you are referring to TMAX 100, then I would have to agree. I tested them and found that they have a similar look, with TMAX showing much better resolution. TMAX rendered blues ever so slightly darker. I look at TMAX 100 as a modern, faster, T-Grain version of Panatomic-X.
No, it was over thirty years ago, before I knew those existed.
It’s cheap, if you know where to look anyway. I buy Aviphot 200 for pennies on the dollar. Been cold stored since new, good results. Just bought a bulk roll of TMax 100 for $70, well under MSRP, minimal fogging, looks perfectly usable, so I pulled the trigger.
Any advice on how to expose/process long expired Ektachrome? I have dozens of rolls from 2000, 1983, 1970's.
I shoot at box speed and develop normally. The oldest transparency (E6 process) I've bothered to shoot and process was 27 years expired, and it turned out very nicely in terms of exposure and color. An example is attached. It's a cell phone shot of the 8x10 on a light table, so it's not flat and there are reflections, but it should provide a general idea of what you might get with old stock. The film expired in 1996 and was shot earlier this year. Exposure was at ISO 100 (box speed) and developed using standard times in a Tetanal E6 kit.
I've also shot stock that was less expired but had major color shifts (like entirely green). It depends upon the stock and how it was stored, of course, but the one thing that has always been constant is exposure and processing. Even when the colors turned out crazy, I always got well exposed images with transparency stocks using box speed and the standard E6 developing process.
In my experience adding a stop a decade for expired film (the common internet wisdom) is a terrible idea when using transparency films.
I've never tried shooting anything older than this, so I can't speak to your 1983 or 70's vintage stock, but I'd expect it would be kind of toasty at this point.
I've also shot stock that was less expired but had major color shifts (like entirely green). It depends upon the stock and how it was stored, of course, but the one thing that has always been constant is exposure and processing. Even when the colors turned out crazy, I always got well exposed images with transparency stocks using box speed and the standard E6 developing process.
In my experience adding a stop a decade for expired film (the common internet wisdom) is a terrible idea when using transparency films.
I've never tried shooting anything older than this, so I can't speak to your 1983 or 70's vintage stock, but I'd expect it would be kind of toasty at this point.
Attachments
thanks, I will probably try developing a single frame first from 35mm film, at box speed, then compensate until its right. I have a box of 18 rolls from 2003, and a few others from 80's and 70's.
Fog is the big enemy for processing it reversal. If you only get muddy transparencies developing it as reversal, you can try cross processing it in C41 to get negatives and then enlarge as b&w (or convert). There's no weird mask on Ektachrome, so it would enlarge well as b&w. (I've done it, actually.)
Use a warming skylight filter and have fun.
Well I want to develop expired ektachrome as a positive for actual slide projection/ viewing, not for printing.
Last edited:
on what, on expired ektachrome? or is this a personal-guidance/life-advice phrase ? hard to tell by reading alone. I could use that phrase as a signature under every entry I place here.
"Use a warming skylight filter and have fun."
You're welcome to it, but don't pretend you are confused as to what I meant.
Cheers
Cheers
-
- kfed1984
- Deleted
- Reason: 123
Well, that's why I said fog would be the big problem. What do you get when you reverse fog?
Maybe your film isn't too badly age fogged. Who knows.
| Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:  |