I am a long time monochrome shooter in all formats from 35mm to 4x5.
I already own a just-CLAed Leica IIIf with both an uncoated 50mm f/3.5 collapsible Elmar and a 50mm f/2 collapsible Summicron.
I am contemplating the purchase of an M body. They are all stupidly expensive and I doubt I really can justify a modern M6 or similar camera.
My heart has always been with the M5 (I know, I'm weird, you're not the first to notice) but I am told that the M5s are maintenance nightmares, that the rollers go bad and no replacements are available, that the meters fail, etc.
So .... Leicanistas - what are the tradeoffs in your hive mind between the M2, M3, M4, M4-2, and M4-P? I plan to use my existing LTM lenses via an adapter ring.
Feel free to make the case that I really don't need an M body at all
Chuck I'm particularly fond of the M2 ....it was the first Leica I owned. I like the uncluttered viewfinder.....& i use a 35mm lens as standard so the M3 never worked for me. Over the years i've owned every model up to and including the MP.....when they were in production. I prefer the feel of the brass gears on the M2,3,4 over the modern M4-2,4-P, 6, MP....with their steel gears & I far prefer the black paint to the black chrome models. I'd suggest an M2 or M4.....
There are lots of M2s listed on Ebay at $12-1300 & M4 at $15-1700. You can't go wrong with either of those.
Although i owned several M6 and an MP the meter didn't matter to me and i hated the cluttered viewfinder with all the superimposed finder lines.
My black M4 is my real keeper...& though i work more in medium format, I won't sell it and i continue to get good results with it.
View attachment 358801
Interesting. I had sort of independently come to much the same conclusion: An M2 or an M4, for much the same reasons you cite.
Can you say a bit more about why you prefer the black paint over the chrome finish?
Oh, you definitely need an M body
I think you've already received good advice from earlier responders but I'll chime in as well...
I have an M2, M4 and M-A and agree that the M2 is perfect if 35mm is your preferred focal length. I'm not a huge fan of the M4 rewind knob or the film advance lever, although the latter is pretty easy to swap out for the rigid film advance lever (I haven't done it but I believe @Huss has). My M-A is black chrome which I think looks pretty stealthy - there is no visible Leica branding anywhere and no engraving on the top plate.
Whatever you choose, I'd recommend buying from a reputable Leica dealer as opposed to somewhere like eBay (no affiliation, but I personally like dealing with Leica Store Miami). You'll pay a bit more but that's worth the peace of mind, IMO.
Good luck!
My heart has always been with the M5 (I know, I'm weird, you're not the first to notice) but I am told that the M5s are maintenance nightmares, that the rollers go bad and no replacements are available, that the meters fail, etc.
I'll chime in and say that I ran an M5 for quite a while and had no issues. I think the roller fiasco stuff you read about online afflicts earlier serial numbers only. Don't quote me on that though. M5s are still easily had for bargain prices (comparatively speaking, that is). What annoyed me more with the M5 was the lack of 28mm framelines. I've since moved to an MP and an M7 and still kind of miss the metering of the M5; it's really quite precise and accurate in that regard.
Look for a later 3-lug model in good shape and enjoy
Here's your answer: go with your heart. The most important thing to learn about Leica ownership is avoiding the Leicaphile community which persists on myths, rituals, and cargo cults. Victims who've been sucked into it inevitably abandon photo making in favor of brass worship and fully mechanical lifestyle because all electricity must be reserved for iPhones to take pictures of Leicas. They regularly engage in heated debates over the brand of electrical tape to cover the red dot with, and you care what these people have to say about the rollers?
There are tons of virtually unused M5s with all of their mechanical parts in factory-new condition out there. Send one to Sherry and you'll have a machine for life.
Yeah, there is a slavish cult side to this among the lifestyle hipsters ... I ignore them.
I'll chime in and say that I ran an M5 for quite a while and had no issues. I think the roller fiasco stuff you read about online afflicts earlier serial numbers only. Don't quote me on that though. M5s are still easily had for bargain prices (comparatively speaking, that is). What annoyed me more with the M5 was the lack of 28mm framelines. I've since moved to an MP and an M7 and still kind of miss the metering of the M5; it's really quite precise and accurate in that regard.
Look for a later 3-lug model in good shape and enjoy
As it happens, I just came upon a really clean M2 that was just serviced by DAG last month. I though the price quite reasonable at $1225. ("Reasonable" and "Leica" appear to be somewhat at odds ... but relatively speaking, it was ...)
That's pretty inexpensive for a just-CLA''d M2. How is it cosmetically?
That's pretty inexpensive for a just-CLA''d M2. How is it cosmetically?
Historically, the M4-2 has been snubbed a bit by the Leica community, so prices lagged what other M's brought making them a relative bargain. I dunno if that's still the case though.
It omits the self-timer, and has no meter, but you can still make good pictures with one. You can also use lenses like Jupiter 12's that interfere with the meter probe in M5's.
That's a winner!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?