Helios 1984
Member
Compard RO9 for large format FP4+ is a favourite for me, lovely tones, grain doesn't matter, very easy to use.
This one is sold in Canada as Blazinal.
Compard RO9 for large format FP4+ is a favourite for me, lovely tones, grain doesn't matter, very easy to use.
Another thing to consider: if you are developing at home by hand (not with a machine system like a Jobo), then there will be minor variations in your time, agitation, temperature, and dilution of the Rodinal. In addition, your exposure when you took the photograph and the subject matter will vary. These will all affect your negatives more then the minor differences between formulations. Time is not too bad an issue with 1:50 dilutions because the time is around 8 or 9 minutes, so a few seconds off does not really matter. I use distilled water to reduce any effect of chemicals in the municipal water system. Fortunately, I still have some bottles of genuine Agfa Rodinal.You won’t find any appreciable difference between the various branding of Rodinal. They are interchangeable.
From Adox’s web site:
“RODINAL is produced according to Agfa Leverkusen´s latest Rodinal* formula from 2004.
It does not get more Rodinal than this.
ADOX works together with former Agfa scientists on all Agfa-replacement products.
If you have used Agfa Rodinal* before you can achieve identical results with ADOX RODINAL.
Compared to R09/APH09 Rodinal works more fine grained while still enhancing sharpness and acutance.”
But bear in mind, all of these formulations are minor tweaks on the original Rodinal formula, and I do mean minor. I’ve used Adox Rodinal, and RO9, and even a vintage bottle of Agfa Rodinal from 1985 and they are, for all practical purposes, identical.
Buy whatever is available to you and use it!
maybe Ian can shed some light from his extensive library.Will the real Rodinal please stand up! The formula has changed several since the developer's inception. The formulas for the different variants has never been published. The only one that we have information on is the Wolfen recipe which was seized as war reparation after WWII. So the question is unanswerable.
Try adding 0.25 grams of borax to your usual 2 reel volume of 1:50 Rodinal. See how that worksStill looking for sharp grain developers.![]()
Best link ever, thanks for posting that up!thread from ADOX
I am also perfectly happy with RO9/one stop and have yet to be let down by it, I developed a film today and used the dregs from a 3 year old bottle and the results are fine on Fomapan 400, as they say waste not want not, I found the bottle at the back of my chemical shelfI think the bigger question is, even if not 100% accurate to a old formula.... in what way does modern RO9/Adonal/Rodinal let you down?
So far i've been perfectly happy with RO9....
There was no suggestion of a let-down. Rather, users have discussed at length if they can see a difference,Here is the short answer:I think the bigger question is, even if not 100% accurate to a old formula.... in what way does modern RO9/Adonal/Rodinal let you down?
So far i've been perfectly happy with RO9....
Will the real Rodinal please stand up! The formula has changed several since the developer's inception. The formulas for the different variants has never been published. The only one that we have information on is the Wolfen recipe which was seized as war reparation after WWII. So the question is unanswerable.
+1
Not to mention that the original AktienGesellschaft für AnilinFabrikation ended up divided like a pizza, in the aftermath of WWII.
How did AGAF become AGFA
Post #30 is a completely correct answer to the OP's question.Right. 47 posts, no answer. Perfect.
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links. To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here. |
PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY: ![]() |