silvercloud2323
Member
Hello all,
I'm back with the images that I could scan.
Because of the smaller size of the print i printed at the friends place i misinterpreted as higher in sharpness. But now when i,look at 1/and 3/ i see there was not so much difference , it was only underexposed. I think i like underexposed print.
The difference between the old lens and the new is obvious clear. The newer lens has more contrast and better separation of the tone values.
1/ smaller print , (at friends place), with the other lens (17 cm on 11 cm)
2/ old lens print ; flat appearance low on inner contrast (29 cm on 20cm)
3/ new lens on enlarger print , but underexposed (24 cm on 16 cm)
4/ new lens on enlarger print , (24 cm on 16cm)
Hope that some people can learn from it.
I'm back with the images that I could scan.
Because of the smaller size of the print i printed at the friends place i misinterpreted as higher in sharpness. But now when i,look at 1/and 3/ i see there was not so much difference , it was only underexposed. I think i like underexposed print.
The difference between the old lens and the new is obvious clear. The newer lens has more contrast and better separation of the tone values.
1/ smaller print , (at friends place), with the other lens (17 cm on 11 cm)
2/ old lens print ; flat appearance low on inner contrast (29 cm on 20cm)
3/ new lens on enlarger print , but underexposed (24 cm on 16 cm)
4/ new lens on enlarger print , (24 cm on 16cm)
Hope that some people can learn from it.