removed account4
Subscriber
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2003
- Messages
- 29,832
- Format
- Hybrid
yes there are a lot of people who have no clue and hate ink and file images, true, but there are also people who know what they are talking aboutWe all do know that most arguments against inkjet are made by people who don't have the tools (proper inkjet photo printers) AT HAND, so are ignorant
and don't believe some of they hype about anything .. i believe some of the hype but not all of it.
A substantial minority of inkjet printer users mixes their own pigments....
sounds good !
maybe, but it is a word that is used often to refer to something made by hand "the old fashioned way" in france for example"Artisanal" is a tiresome, trendy, cute Brooklyn buzz word.
there are bakers who make bread deemed "artisanal" because it is made the same way the baker's father or great grand father might have made it,
and it carries the lable "artisanal" because several years ago ( 10-15? ) breads were being made commercially, and had lost some of its soul
( or something like that ) so it was a way to differentiate more generic type breads from things made by hand.
very much like one would differentiate a machine print where the operator was alseep at the switch with one who payed attention to every detail
or a "custom" print..
as said, i have no argument that digital and ink have artistic merit, but i would not say it has anything to do with michael angelo or people like
Vaughn or Andrew O'Neil who bring a 8x10 cameras places, process the film and make carbon prints, similar but not the same league
as making a beautiful file tuned in editing software and printed in hand filled ink cartridges on japanese paper with a computer conduit...
i would call one a bit more "artisanal" using the french bread example than the other, unless the ink person make the computer themselves,
and the printer too ...
Last edited: