Where are the well-used Leica M's?

spain

A
spain

  • 1
  • 0
  • 36
Humming Around!

D
Humming Around!

  • 4
  • 0
  • 58
Pride

A
Pride

  • 2
  • 1
  • 127
Paris

A
Paris

  • 5
  • 1
  • 201

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,420
Messages
2,774,697
Members
99,611
Latest member
Toonces
Recent bookmarks
0

AZD

Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2021
Messages
312
Location
SLC, UT
Format
35mm
To preface, I recently sold my very nice 1955 M3. I liked how it felt and worked and the images it could make, but it didn’t get as much use as it should have. One big reason is it was just too nice. I couldn’t bring myself to treat a shiny 70 year old Leica the same as my Nikons, which have sometimes been rode hard and hung up wet. Believing that I shouldn’t be too precious about little chunks of metal, I let it go.

So where are the beat up film M’s? Is everyone today being a little too careful like me? Is the whole point to collect and invest and CLA endlessly such that the marketplace only presents shiny Veblen goods? Did they all become parts cameras or expensive black repaints?

Actual beaters show up now and then, but they are few and far between. Honestly though, that’s kind of what I want. Not an artificially and incorrectly relic’d (oh how I dislike that spelling) poser camera, or expensive brass-under-black-paint faux-tojournalist prop, just a ratty chrome M that otherwise works fine.

As is often the case, I suspect disappointment is in store. So what have you seen, and where?
 

GregY

Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Messages
3,167
Location
Alberta
Format
Large Format
It seems you have to luck into them. Same with Nikon F black paint.....all too many collectors' closet queens...
IMG_9392 4.JPG
 
OP
OP

AZD

Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2021
Messages
312
Location
SLC, UT
Format
35mm
Yeah, there you go. That’d do nicely.

Actually, some time back I saw a very rough looking black chrome M4 on Etsy of all places. Price was good. I messed the seller (or, I wondered, image poster?) who responded, but mentioned the “low shutter count”. That kinda put me off since it’s not really a film camera term and impossible to verify even if it was. Too bad, it would’ve been perfect.
 

AnselMortensen

Subscriber
Joined
Jun 9, 2020
Messages
2,416
Location
SFBayArea
Format
Traditional
Have you ever noticed that all the '67-'69 Camaros you see are Z-28's, Rally Sports or Super Sports?
Where are all the base-model grocery-getters?
Same issue....
 

GregY

Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Messages
3,167
Location
Alberta
Format
Large Format
Yeah, there you go. That’d do nicely.

Actually, some time back I saw a very rough looking black chrome M4 on Etsy of all places. Price was good. I messed the seller (or, I wondered, image poster?) who responded, but mentioned the “low shutter count”. That kinda put me off since it’s not really a film camera term and impossible to verify even if it was. Too bad, it would’ve been perfect.

It takes a lot of effort to wear a black chrome M. They're pretty resistant to wear.
 
OP
OP

AZD

Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2021
Messages
312
Location
SLC, UT
Format
35mm
Have you ever noticed that all the '67-'69 Camaros you see are Z-28's, Rally Sports or Super Sports?
Where are all the base-model grocery-getters?
Same issue....

Yes. Just like all ‘57 Chevies were apparently Bel Airs instead of lowly 150 sedans (which actually look better to me, especially in black. Eeeevil, in a good way).

I suppose that’s the essence of it: collectibility and resale potential vs real world usability likely drives what is commonly available and how it is treated after purchase.

For comparison, I recently bought a Nikkor 35mm f/1.4 on this forum, spotless glass but exterior well used. Perfect. Exactly the kind of equipment I need and appreciate. No worries when it inevitably gets knocked around.

I guess I’ll keep my eyes open for an M that’s already been devalued by enthusiastic picture taking.

It takes a lot of effort to wear a black chrome M. They're pretty resistant to wear.
True, chrome is quite durable. I could do it though!
 

GregY

Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2005
Messages
3,167
Location
Alberta
Format
Large Format
Yes. Just like all ‘57 Chevies were apparently Bel Airs instead of lowly 150 sedans (which actually look better to me, especially in black. Eeeevil, in a good way).

I suppose that’s the essence of it: collectibility and resale potential vs real world usability likely drives what is commonly available and how it is treated after purchase.

For comparison, I recently bought a Nikkor 35mm f/1.4 on this forum, spotless glass but exterior well used. Perfect. Exactly the kind of equipment I need and appreciate. No worries when it inevitably gets knocked around.

I guess I’ll keep my eyes open for an M that’s already been devalued by enthusiastic picture taking.


True, chrome is quite durable. I could do it though!

You got that one? I hesitated.... but i have a 105 to match...
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8963.JPG
    IMG_8963.JPG
    1.9 MB · Views: 4
OP
OP

AZD

Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2021
Messages
312
Location
SLC, UT
Format
35mm
You got that one? I hesitated.... but i have a 105 to match...

Excellent, I see we have similar tastes in lovingly used equipment.

Yes, I picked up that 35mm a while back because I needed something wider than my 55 f/1.2 but always end up in the dark so faster is better. It required de-yellowing with a UV LED lamp but it cleared up nicely.

The reduced file size does not show all the detail that’s in the scan. 35mm f/1.4 @ 2.0 and 1/15 second, USA Fuji 400. The ghost flames on his pants leg were caused by the clear protective filter, oops.

IMG_7178.jpeg
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom