Yeah, there you go. That’d do nicely.
Actually, some time back I saw a very rough looking black chrome M4 on Etsy of all places. Price was good. I messed the seller (or, I wondered, image poster?) who responded, but mentioned the “low shutter count”. That kinda put me off since it’s not really a film camera term and impossible to verify even if it was. Too bad, it would’ve been perfect.
Have you ever noticed that all the '67-'69 Camaros you see are Z-28's, Rally Sports or Super Sports?
Where are all the base-model grocery-getters?
Same issue....
True, chrome is quite durable. I could do it though!It takes a lot of effort to wear a black chrome M. They're pretty resistant to wear.
Yes. Just like all ‘57 Chevies were apparently Bel Airs instead of lowly 150 sedans (which actually look better to me, especially in black. Eeeevil, in a good way).
I suppose that’s the essence of it: collectibility and resale potential vs real world usability likely drives what is commonly available and how it is treated after purchase.
For comparison, I recently bought a Nikkor 35mm f/1.4 on this forum, spotless glass but exterior well used. Perfect. Exactly the kind of equipment I need and appreciate. No worries when it inevitably gets knocked around.
I guess I’ll keep my eyes open for an M that’s already been devalued by enthusiastic picture taking.
True, chrome is quite durable. I could do it though!
You got that one? I hesitated.... but i have a 105 to match...
... or this M3 belonged to Hans Scissorlashes.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?