• Welcome to Photrio!
    Registration is fast and free. Join today to unlock search, see fewer ads, and access all forum features.
    Click here to sign up

When the camera you buy becomes the deciding factor for your ethics rating

That’s all that really counts... both of you are in agreement on the deal(s)...and happy with yourselves and each other.
 
Thank you Brian, you are always a source of joy for me. But I could never understand why, as early as I get up in the East Coast, you seem already to be awake. Thus, we have the eighth wonder of the world within our midst. - David Lyga
 
Ahh, you win some you lose some. Poor form the guy wasnt more appreciated in your efforts.
There's still plenty of good deals out there if you are patient. I picked an F4 at a charity store the other day for $12, thought that was bargain enough and then after I paid her, she said hold on there's a lens that goes with it, a 20mm nikkor AF, my jaw dropped. I was torn between getting a fantastic bargain and my conscience of knowing how much it was really worth. I will make a donation and fix my conscience later, but what a beaut lens.
 
My reading comprehension is getting bad over the years. I didn't quite understand original post well. I thought the Son is selling his father's stuff via Cardinal. Now that I understood that the Son is the one who is the boss at Cardinal. So If I were David I simply sell it to him for $125. That's all. He is making money buying and selling those stuff.
 
David, IMO, insecurity also comes out in the form of relentless argueing/needing the last word. Something I deal within myself.

awty -- I felt the same was when I found an original model of a Diana camera for $1.00 at a charity shop -- then when I got to the sales clerk, I was told it was on sale for $0.75. But it was missing the decorative chrome ring around the lens, so I guess that's okay...

Carbon print from that camera -- it works!
 

Attachments

  • 3BoysNorthJetty.jpg
    310.2 KB · Views: 102
I see no wrongdoing on your part. strip yourself of any feelings of guilt and move on.
 
jnantz said:
I'm not sure why you lowered your price. I would not have done that. A shop assistants sold you the camera, and had opportunity to remove it from your bunch of stuff you wanted to buy but didn't.
Click to expand...

Exactly.
The assistant represented the owner. If the assitant fails it is a problem between those two, nothing of your concern.
Things would be different if you mislead by purpose the assistant (e.g. hiding a sprecios item or accessory).
 


Exactly what I was thinking. The OP added significant value. The $125 asking price sounds like a bargain for a refreshed 124g
 
The two of you came to a compromise in which all parties were willing to accept, and that's as good of a conclusion as any. No reason to worry about it any further.

In the end, you have to ask yourself what the most important part of all of this is. The gear flipping, I mean. Is it the money? Is it the experience? Is it the relationships you make? Is it the knowledge you aquire? Remember why you're doing it, and let that be your guide. Letting yourself get distracted by other people's values is a good way to lose your passion.
 
I should of waited till half price Tuesday, damn my impatience.
 
David, where are the sellers like you when I need them. "Listed price $500, but for you my friend $100"

 
You charged for your time and expertise, David. There's a difference between a laggy, fungus riddled old camera and one in good working order, and that difference is reflected in the price. Try arguing with a plumber that he used $15 worth of plastic piping available at any merchant, yet charged you $350 to fix the heating boiler. Experience is an expensive commodity.
 
Haaa David, to be perfectly transparent you might have asked how much he paid for it originally and offered the difference (include $60 CLA to you in the calculation) to total $125 which is what he knows the camera is worth.

You performed a CLA for about sixty bucks.
 
Andrew O'Neill said:
David, I like how you think/operate. Good on you!
Click to expand...
It still comes down to this; it still distills into this: I slept well last night. Life is not a balance sheet. There are deals to be had in the future and I have not obviated that potential. - David Lyga
 
Last edited:
David Lyga said:
It still comes down to this; it still distills into this: I slept well last night. Life is not a balance sheet. There are deals to be had in the future and I have not obviated that potential. - David Lyga
Click to expand...

Don't know why your sleep would be disturbed... Did you kill someone? No. Did you harm someone? No? Did you rob someone? No. Did you frustrate someone? No.

The whole story seems weird to me.

A shop has some items to sell. You select 40 of then and then they remove 10 from your selection because they want to sell them for more. Red flag! Is it a standard practice according to you???

Then you propose a price for the 30 remaining items and they agree on the price you offer ($170).

You go back home, you fix a camera and decide to sell it though Craigslist for $125..

You are contacted by the store's owner, you tell him the whole story (why? Any remorse?) and you discount the price by 50%. Red flag! Where is the logical there? Did they give you a discount when your were willing to pay $170? If this is the kind of "deal" you plan in the future, don't count me in.

Now, looking at the whols story, who is ethical and who is not? Who is logical and who is not?

OK, life is not a balance sheet but it is sometimes good to keep both feel on the ground.
 
I get whopping discounts on stuff that they want to get rid of. This is not B&H and, if I was there, I would have surely stood my ground. There will be future benefits to me after making this small concession. No one seems to want most of what they want to get rid of. For example, they 'throw away' perfectly good electronic flashes. Dealing with such stores can sometimes be a bit of a hassle, but, in the end, I will be better off maintaining my good relations.

Dali, not everything in life can be reduced to a simple mathematical equation, and it takes a certain amount of both maturity and bearing in order to elucidate the correct life equation for one's particular needs and sense of general rectitude. This equation must embody both objective and subjective elements. - David Lyga
 
Last edited:
But David, what you describe here isn't a question of ethics. It is a question of a combination of pragmatism - I'll scratch their back if they scratch mine - plus paying attention to maintaining positive communication in order to foster a continuing relationship.
While giving them a break may make total business sense, and may actually help in maintaining a friendly relationship, there would have been absolutely nothing unethical about not giving them that break.
 
This is such a weird thread. As long as David is happy with the outcome I am glad to hear it worked out. Seems like everyone learned a little something and no one got hurt.
 
I agree with you, Matt, that nothing would have been unethical, but let's let btayor be the arbiter here. For purposes of sanity. Thank you. - David Lyga
 
David Lyga said:
I agree with you, Matt, that nothing would have been unethical, but let's let btayor be the arbiter here. For purposes of sanity. Thank you. - David Lyga
Click to expand...
So would a better title to the thread be: "When-the-camera-you-buy-becomes-the-deciding-factor-for-how-you-feel-about-yourself"?
I'm asking, because I'm particularly interested in the subject of ethics, and how issues of ethics and issues of philosophy sometimes are distinct, and sometimes overlap.
I think, in the situation you describe, you made a choice that was prudent and led you to feel comfortable about the result, because you fostered goodwill with generosity.
I don't think that if you had made another decision you would have been in any way unethical or wrong.
 
I also would have felt awkward about entering into the transaction with the person whose store I bought it from. But I would have dealt with it by simply not replying to his email. He would never have known who I was (throwaway email address for CL) or that he had previously owned it.

Life is complicated enough without looking for ways to make it worse.
 
But they DO know me: my face is imprinted onto everyone's brain at both that store and the Photorama camera shows, twice yearly. I cannot escape; I would be captured and spend the rest of eternity in a Federal lockup. And the reason that this is serious business is because I want to try to woo one of the guards at that lockup. (Then I would not only be captured, but also enraptured.)

So you see, there really is method in David Lyga's madness. - David Lyga
 
DonJ said:
I also would have felt awkward about entering into the transaction with the person whose store I bought it from.
Click to expand...
I would not had any difficulties with such deal. The price I paid would be known. Capitalist society rules urge an added value just for a re-sale. And the effort and time I spend would have to be considered too.

Aside of this in acquiring photo stuff I follow the rule "sometime you take and sometime you give" and I feel my counterparts feel the same, thus a good relation mostly has been established.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register