I sort of remember reading about that Nikon.Nikon had the F3AF out in 1983, which had the "DX-1" AF finder which handled the AF feedback, used with the 80mm F2.8 AF-Nikkor, 200 F3.5 AF-Nikkor, and TC-16 AF. It worked, was slow and ugly. Not many made.
Zeiss Nettar 515/16 folding camera; 6x6cm format on common 120-size film. Likely made in 1937-1939. Basically medium format in your pocket.
...
Have you told your Rollieflexes yet, and do they approve?Dead Link Removed
I got an RZ-67 with the 110 f2.8 and 180 f4.5 lenses (180 not pictured here).
I got an RZ-67 with the 110 f2.8 and 180 f4.5 lenses.
They're ok so long as they know they're not being replaced. And with as big and heavy as the RZ is, they won't get replaced any time soon. I really got it for a specific project I have in mind next year.Have you told your Rollieflexes yet, and do they approve?
If the "XX" overlaps, it is a very early one. Minolta had to change it because of Exxon's lawsuit:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minolta_Maxxum_7000
This Maxxum camera and all autofocus SLRs that followed made me ignore new 35mm SLRs until Nikon's FM3a in 2003.
Now it is interesting: an historic camera like the EOS 650.
Nice purchase, in its orignal case and with dedicated flash. Looks as almost new.
I remember that, back then, these cameras were advertised in Italy as "The Olympus' egg".
I have friends who do a lot of travelling, and a lot of travel photography. They used those Olympus IS cameras for many years to great effect. Their travel photos were excellent.
The price was very reasonable. The camera shows little signs of use and works perfectly in Manual, Aperture-Priority, and Shutter-Priority. Nice viewfinder. Solid body. Nice motor drive. I could not resist:
View attachment 189475
View attachment 189476
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?