Rolleiflex 2.8D Planar. It was CLA'd by local specialist and is in really really nice condition. Love it!
Hey Iakustov, I've got a 2.8D Flex w/ Xenotar! I think we've both got the sexiest model of them all; uncluttered nameplate, slim focus knob without meter and ect. but those adjustable hood magnifiers drove me crazy and so I taped those down. How do you like yours?
View attachment 173552 Have always wanted one of these, so when I had a chance to grab this high serial number body in absolutely pristine condition - well, couldn't say no. Has to be the sexiest camera ever made (I need to get out more!)
Congrats, and thanks for posting this. It caused me to check my F4's s/n. I googled the topic and found a site (http://www.nicovandijk.net/nikonf4.htm) that mentions F4 serial numbers. My F4's s/n is 2236xxx, so it was most likely made in 1992, fairly late in the F4's production run. Which is good news to me. Mine should still have a lot of life left to it. Hope yours does too!
Recaught a catch-and-release F body from a year or so ago. Chrome F that I bought for the finder back then. Dead self-timer, but shutter, film advance, etc works fine. Currently wears a Photomic Tn finder and my old F-36 drive that went with it when I traded it for an F "apollo".
-J
I got a nice Kodak Signet 35 from Goodwill. It seems to work, but I haven't developed the film yet. These were supposed to have been made from 1951 to 1958 according to Kodak Customer Service Pamphlet AA-13, but the date code on the lens is RY = 1950. Who services these things? After 66 years it probably needs a CLA.
A better question for John might be how many Nikon F cameras has he "fostered".How many Nikon F cameras do you have?
A better question for John might be how many Nikon F cameras has he "fostered".
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?