I have a black Nikon FE2 on the way from California.
I spent as much to replace the mirror foam as it would have cost to buy another. I'd do it again. 'Had this one since new in mid 80s. The shots you see on the gallery pg at the moment are all w/ my FE2. There are more costly models & other really good ones, but I've been awful happy w/ mine.
This thing showed up on my doorstep yesterday. It looks like a IIIa and the lens is a Serenar 35mm f/3.2. Came with a neverready case in decent shape and the case for the lens and its rangefinder. Not a rangefinder, though, is it? More of a viewfinder. The camera and lens are both in very nice shape, although the camera's slow speeds are erratic. Dunno what I'm gonna do about that yet.
View attachment 152474
Now I guess that I do not have to give you mine.A Rolleiflex 2.8D from about February of 1956. It's now sitting alongside my 3.5F from May of 1960. I think the D models have a nice balance of characteristics: you can choose to engage the EV system or not and there's no complex linkage to an aging selenium meter (when the camera is not in use, I attach a cover over the meter to block it from light). I'm not sure why E's and F's seem to be valued more.
2.8D
View attachment 153031
3.5F
View attachment 153032
Now I guess that I do not have to give you mine.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?