mshchem
Subscriber
Cool; what kind of light source is it?
This is all PWM controlled (16 bit), so not a problem. Also, this is for my Durst 138 which is a 5x7" enlarger (I only use it up to 4x5" though). I find this power level is actually OK; it's plenty fast enough for color work but probably on the slow side for large B&W prints on warmtone paper - but I don't do those much, anyway. A previous version was around 350W RMS - this was a bit much. I actually implemented a digital ND filter to run it at down to 12.5% for smaller prints.
That's technically more than the formal education I've got in this area, lol!
It's a 10mm grid on the cutting mat, so the entire PCB is 100x56mm and the light emitting area is around 80x44mm. The limiting factor here is the old Intel cooler I had lying around and I wanted to mount this onto. The 350W version mentioned earlier was 100x160mm.
Yes, it would. The main trick is to get even illumination. Heiland does this by skipping any condensers and diffusion chambers already present in the enlarger and just plonking a large array of LEDs with a diffuser plate right on top of the negative carrier. I prefer to keep using the condensers in my 138, which is a little trickier, but also a little more efficient than the Heiland approach. So I'm effectively doing what you're proposing; the light source shown here will drop right on top of the existing bulb socket of the 138 (originally intended for an opal bulb btw; this is an oooold version). For smaller enlargers, you could do a smaller array of LEDs on a smaller PCB.
I was playing with the thought of doing this with a Durst M305 I was about to be gifted, but then I found a local skate club with some analog photography enthusiasts and decided to gift it to them so they can enlarge their color negatives with it.
Aha, that should work. Thanks for all the info. This is an important topic as all these enlargers age and original lamps and bulbs get hard to find.