What was the MOST BEAUTIFUL camera?

Brirish Wildflowers

A
Brirish Wildflowers

  • 0
  • 0
  • 29
Classic Biker

A
Classic Biker

  • 1
  • 0
  • 29
Dog Walker

A
Dog Walker

  • 0
  • 0
  • 19
Flannigan's Pass

A
Flannigan's Pass

  • 4
  • 1
  • 69

Forum statistics

Threads
198,986
Messages
2,784,153
Members
99,762
Latest member
Krikelin22
Recent bookmarks
1

GRHazelton

Subscriber
Joined
May 26, 2006
Messages
2,249
Location
Jonesboro, G
Format
Multi Format
And you're a bad bad man Les.


Pentax glass is cheap compared to Nikon.............dammit. But the LX commands a price like a Nikon so it must be all it's said to be..............again dammit.

It is all it is said to be......and more! You KNOW you want one. Yield to temptation.....:whistling:
 

Theo Sulphate

Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2014
Messages
6,489
Location
Gig Harbor
Format
Multi Format
Right now I'm lusting after a silver Nikon FM3a. So my pick is for that. Beautiful on the outside and the (engineering on the) inside. The design team was very attached to this camera and poured their heart and soul into it. The older engineers as the culmination of their careers and the younger engineers as an opportunity to be part of a dying legacy. That's a good mix for something great.

Mine is black and it's just beautiful. It's astonishing that Nikon even made the FM3a; it is the last and one of their best manual cameras.
 

RobC

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
3,880
Location
UK
Format
Multi Format
Since everyone else is posting pics....

Canon Demi, the perfect pocket camera.

attachment.php
 

Les Sarile

Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2010
Messages
3,425
Location
Santa Cruz, CA
Format
35mm
Pentax Spotmatic, from early to Spot F, does not include ES or ESII, they are too tall.

The ES and ESII are actually not much taller than the Spotmatics. They got taller after the original, S & K through the first K mounts. As you can see they figured out a way to make the LX - an interchangeable viewfinder SLR, the same size as the original AP. The only thing the LX lacks is the original Asahi Optical Co logo on the prism.

orig.jpg
 

flavio81

Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2014
Messages
5,069
Location
Lima, Peru
Format
Medium Format
I think i'd better do the list by brand

Agfa
Beautiful:
Colorflex
Ambi-Silette
Karat IV
Clack

Ugliest:
Click

Zeiss
Most beautiful:
Contarex bullseye
Contessa 533/24
Contax RTS
Contax rangefinder

Most ugly:
Contarex bullseye...

Rollei
Beautiful:
Rolleiflex 2.8 models
Rolleiflex SL66

Ugliest: Rolleiflex SL35

Leica
Beautiful:
Leica M3
Leicaflex original

Ugliest: Leica M5

Hasselblad
Beautiful: 500C
Ugly: Hasselblad Lunar

Canon
Beautiful:
Canon F-1, F-1 New
Canon EF
Canon A-1
Canonflex R2000

Ugliest:
Canon T50

Nikon
Beautiful:
Nikon F w/plain prism,
Nikon F3,
Nikon F4
Nikon SP

Ugliest:
Nikon F with Photomic heads (all of them)
Nikon F5
Nikonos models
Nikkorex

Mamiya
Beautiful:
RB67
Mamiyaflex C2

Ugliest:
1000DTL

Minolta
Beautiful:
XK
SRT-101

Ugliest:
X-370, X-500 and similar

Pentax
Beautiful:
Spotmatic SP (in black)
LX

Ugliest:
K1000

Olympus
Beautiful:
Olympus Pen S
Olympus 35SP
OM-1
Ugliest: that AF 35mm SLR they made

Other
Beautiful:
Bell and Howell Foton
Ensign Autorange 820
Polaroid SX70

Ugliest:
All Argus cameras
All ALPA 35mm SLR cameras
All Yashicas
All Ricoh cameras (award for most consistently ugly designs)
Ensign Ful-Vue
Most polaroid instant cameras

... AND THE WINNER FOR MOST BEAUTIFUL CAMERA OF ALL TIMES IS:

35mm fixed lens rangefinder:
Zeiss-Ikon Contessa 533/24

35mm interchangeable lens rangefinder:
Nikon SP

35mm SLR
Too many!

Medium format TLR
Rolleiflex 2.8F

Medium format SLR
Rolleiflex SL66

Large format
Linhof Kardan Color

... AND THE WINNER FOR MOST **UGLY ** CAMERA OF ALL TIMES IS:

Tie: Ricoh TLS 401 with Yashica 230AF

... AND THE WINNER FOR MOST AESTHETICALLY VERSATILE:

Nikon F -- goes from "ugliest" to "prettiest" by just changing viewfinders!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

flavio81

Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2014
Messages
5,069
Location
Lima, Peru
Format
Medium Format
I never thought I'd see the day when a Canon A-1 and a Nikon F4 would be described as pretty. You'll be describing the Canon T70 as pretty next! (contender for the ugliest SLR ever?)

You don't consider the Canon A-1 pretty? I do.

See:

2.jpg



Dead Link Removed
 
Last edited by a moderator:

flavio81

Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2014
Messages
5,069
Location
Lima, Peru
Format
Medium Format
Nikon F4 -- so pretty, the only thing that could make it prettier is a "Canon" logo!!

Nikon_F4_Guigiaro_Design_Austin_Calhoon_Photograph.jpg
 

ColColt

Member
Joined
May 26, 2015
Messages
1,824
Location
TN
Format
Multi Format
Yep, that is right purdy.
 

RobC

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
3,880
Location
UK
Format
Multi Format
The list might have been a lot shorter if the question was "which is the ugliest camera of all time?"
 

DCB12

Member
Joined
Nov 4, 2013
Messages
82
Location
FL
Format
Medium Format
attachment.php


Peace
 

Attachments

  • DSC_5649.jpg
    DSC_5649.jpg
    321.8 KB · Views: 419

RobC

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
3,880
Location
UK
Format
Multi Format
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder and there's no accounting for taste.
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
-) Minox EC


-) The type 110 Agfamatic range.

(Also a bestseller with model 2008.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

PCC

Member
Joined
May 31, 2015
Messages
46
Location
San Francisc
Format
Multi Format
Nikon 35Ti
Nikon F2 through F4
Nikon FE/FM and the various variants (except the FA)
Olympus XA
Early Leica rangefinders
Pentax LX
Contax RTS III

These are my favorites.
 

albada

Subscriber
Joined
Apr 10, 2008
Messages
2,175
Location
Escondido, C
Format
35mm RF
The Kodak 35 RF (from the late 1940's) is the ugliest one I've seen. Even uglier than the Nikon F with the metered prism.
Regula Cita is one of the prettiest.

Mark Overton
 

Nodda Duma

Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2013
Messages
2,685
Location
Batesville, Arkansas
Format
Multi Format
The Zeiss Ikon Contaflex Super is one that I love the looks of in all its 50s-era chrome splendor and German precision:

From its chrome-lined molded leather case with red velvet interior

ImageUploadedByTapatalk1436952188.618324.jpg

ImageUploadedByTapatalk1436952217.819180.jpg

to the black and chrome body with interchangeable front elements on the Zeiss Tessar

ImageUploadedByTapatalk1436952414.695149.jpg

ImageUploadedByTapatalk1436952427.168297.jpg

ImageUploadedByTapatalk1436952516.882798.jpg

ImageUploadedByTapatalk1436952532.436248.jpg

ImageUploadedByTapatalk1436952681.928391.jpg

As an added bonus, the meter can be relatively painlessly adjusted as the Selenium detector ages.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

baachitraka

Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2011
Messages
3,556
Location
Bremen, Germany.
Format
Multi Format
In my dreams a beautiful Rolleiflex with Xenotar and without a meter.
 

Brett Rogers

Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2012
Messages
213
Format
Multi Format
The Zeiss Ikon Contaflex Super is one that I love the looks of in all its 50s-era chrome splendor and German precision:

From its chrome-lined molded leather case with red velvet interior

View attachment 112670

View attachment 112671

to the black and chrome body with interchangeable front elements on the Zeiss Tessar

View attachment 112672

View attachment 112673

View attachment 112674

View attachment 112675

View attachment 112676

As an added bonus, the meter can be relatively painlessly adjusted as the Selenium detector ages.

The Super is nice, but personally I think the original and the III are both cleaner looking, as well as the Rapid (although I'm less enamoured of the cursive script Zeiss used for the name plate).

How do you adjust the Supers meter to the cell? I've worked out a way, but I'm curious if it is the same as yours.
Cheers,
Brett
 

Nodda Duma

Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2013
Messages
2,685
Location
Batesville, Arkansas
Format
Multi Format
Hi Brett,

Yeah I like all the knobs and gadgets, and the aperture ring on the front top is actually really ergonomic at least for me

Gosh that's really stretching my memory. I don't recall the exact process but it involved aiming at a uniform white scene which I measured the Ev on, verifying what f/# and exposure I should get, then adjusting the aperture/exposure rings. If I remember correctly, they're secured in a type of clutch assembly, so you can loosen the rings, adjust, and re-tighten. Sound familiar?
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom