BTW, @Alexander K I'd expect to get better results with XP2 in something like HC-110 or Xtol (or a clone). I've used Df96 monobath (treat as Delta 400). Then again, you could just shorten your time in Rodinal...
Thank you, Donald Qualls, I settled on Rodinal and reduced the time and reducing ISO. The optimal is 250ISO with a margin in the shadows and highlights.
And that's about what I'd expect with Rodinal in normal development.
Now let me tell you how I have gotten the full box speed back in (Pa)Rodinal: I develop at 1:50, but I extend the development time (IIRC, about double "normal"), and I agitate only two gentle inversions every third minute. Development times run up to 20 minutes, but you get Rodinal character (acutance, crisp grain) and recover most or all of the 1/3 to 2/3 stop of speed loss Rodinal would normally give.
Edit: I was going to paste in the times I used to use with a couple example films (haven't used Parodinal in a while, I should probably mix up a batch), but apparently, I can't use the Wayback Machine from my work network because it isn't https compliant.
Kodak Chevron, with some expired Fuji Provia 100.
You lucky guy!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?