What Is Your Favorite or Easiest Camera Type to Repair

Jekyll driftwood

H
Jekyll driftwood

  • 0
  • 0
  • 20
It's also a verb.

D
It's also a verb.

  • 2
  • 0
  • 28
The Kildare Track

A
The Kildare Track

  • 11
  • 4
  • 112
Stranger Things.

A
Stranger Things.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 76

Recent Classifieds

Forum statistics

Threads
198,915
Messages
2,783,037
Members
99,745
Latest member
Javier Tello
Recent bookmarks
2

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,549
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
I know there are plenty of "Least Favorite," but lets hear about your favorite or easiest.

For me the easiest is the Argus C2 C3 "Brick."
My favorite camera to repair is Yashica FX-3.

I'm interested in hearing about cameras that are good, not because of great lenses, cool features or hype, but cameras that can be repaired over and over that will last a life time.
 

gone

Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2009
Messages
5,504
Location
gone
Format
Medium Format
Putting a battery in my Nikkormat EL is almost like doing a repair. What were they thinking?
 

cmacd123

Subscriber
Joined
May 24, 2007
Messages
4,314
Location
Stittsville, Ontario
Format
35mm
a lot depends on the complexity of the given camera. simple ones with guess focusing are a lot easier to get into than ones with a rangefinder. Plain shutters with no meter also are less complicated.
some models have a common problem that is easy to deal with if the camera is otherwise in good shape. (Minolta Shutter capacitor- here is looking at you)

in SLRs, minolta and pentax tend to be stright forward. the older the better as far as dealing with usoldering wires.
 

Dan Daniel

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 4, 2009
Messages
2,885
Location
upstate New York
Format
Medium Format
Rolleiflexes. The mechanics are clean, the parts are well-finished, the function is smooth.

And they were designed from the ground up to be serviced. These were production machines for professionals, and like any good machine you plan on them breaking down or wearing out from hard use.

A (meterless) Rolleiflex E3 is probably the best design I have worked on. All the improvements over the years that led up to the F, but without the meter coupling and its complexity. Even the depth of field indicator coupling was redesigned on the E3 (and later Fs) to work around the weaknesses of the older design.
 
Last edited:

Tel

Subscriber
Joined
May 9, 2011
Messages
970
Location
New Jersey
Format
Multi Format
My first "pro" camera was a Nikon F. I started out shooting theatrical stuff (mostly documenting my own work for my portfolio) and I needed the reliability and precision of the Nikons. I've always had an F or F2 and it's always been my preferred 35mm still camera. Because of the lighting situation in theatre I learned early on to meter off-camera, and never went back. So I learned to prefer a simpler camera with manual control and no meter. As I began to tinker with my cameras in the late 90s and early noughts (when repair shops were getting harder to find) I quickly came to prefer cameras with simpler mechanisms and good engineering. By then I was working with cinematographers (who also metered off-camera) and began to tinker with movie cameras too. I picked up several Konvas and Kinor 35mm motion picture cameras for my own projects and of necessity learned how to repair those. Again, simplicity of design ruled.

So as a shooter, I already preferred simplicity and reliability together with an absence of "features" that made decisions for me. A meterless F2 is still my go-to 35mm still camera and I've come to rely on Mamiya C2 and C220 when I shoot 120 for the same reasons. Functions are mostly mechanical and visible to the eye and the parts are machined to a high standard and interchangeable between cameras.

Favorites to work on: Nikon F2, Mamiya C2, Arri 2C and 16BL, Kinor 35N(H), Primo Jr/Sawyers Mk IV (I shoot a lot of 127 and the Topcon lenses are good).
 

Tel

Subscriber
Joined
May 9, 2011
Messages
970
Location
New Jersey
Format
Multi Format
PS: To be totally honest, my standout favorite repair/restoration job was my Rochester Optical 1901 Long-focus Premo. Though that mostly entailed working in wood and leather with a little brass engineering. Does that count?
 

flavio81

Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2014
Messages
5,069
Location
Lima, Peru
Format
Medium Format
That was poor design, great camera...

I disagree, that's one of the best places for a battery -- free from enviromental conditions.
 

flavio81

Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2014
Messages
5,069
Location
Lima, Peru
Format
Medium Format
I know there are plenty of "Least Favorite," but lets hear about your favorite or easiest.

For me the easiest is the Argus C2 C3 "Brick."
My favorite camera to repair is Yashica FX-3.

I'm interested in hearing about cameras that are good, not because of great lenses, cool features or hype, but cameras that can be repaired over and over that will last a life time.

I like working on the Bronica ETRS / ETRSi, they're friendly.

I like disassembling my Contax IIa, it's easy too.

The Pentax 67 i also find friendly, however the plastic panels can break if you're not careful.
 

BobD

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2006
Messages
1,113
Location
California,
Format
Analog
Retina cameras because there are plenty of Chris Sherlock videos on the subject.
 

Tel

Subscriber
Joined
May 9, 2011
Messages
970
Location
New Jersey
Format
Multi Format
I like to think of Sherlock as a master teacher--the lessons learned by watching him work translate to many other cameras. (But I've been tempted to pick up a Retina just because...)
 

4season

Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
1,987
Format
Plastic Cameras
I like working on the Bronica ETRS / ETRSi, they're friendly.
I'd call it "friendly-ish" 😛: There are an awful lot of fasteners used to hold the body covers in place, in a variety of different sizes. And when removing the lens mount from the camera body, there are all those shims to deal with. Lucky for me that I measured the thicknesses of these and noted the original location of each one!

IMO, Bronica ETRSi is one of the few cameras which looks cheaper on the outside than it does on the inside.
 
OP
OP
ic-racer

ic-racer

Member
Joined
Feb 25, 2007
Messages
16,549
Location
USA
Format
Multi Format
PS: To be totally honest, my standout favorite repair/restoration job was my Rochester Optical 1901 Long-focus Premo. Though that mostly entailed working in wood and leather with a little brass engineering. Does that count?

Yes!
 

Sirius Glass

Subscriber
Joined
Jan 18, 2007
Messages
50,372
Location
Southern California
Format
Multi Format
Any camera or lens that does not need to be worked on.
 

j-dogg

Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2010
Messages
1,542
Location
Floor-it-duh
Format
Multi Format
FED-2. I have literally fixed a shutter speed issue on one by pulling up on the shutter speed selector and sliding a drop or two of sewing machine oil down the shaft. One of my FEDs has been working like that for 5 years now and probably 50 rolls of film by now.

Now that I have gotten more experienced in camera repair I would never do that but it's very easy to work on.
 

AgX

Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2007
Messages
29,973
Location
Germany
Format
Multi Format
I am surprised by the replies, as I expected the Zenit series at the top.


But I see that simply designed not necessary means simple to repair.
 

Nitroplait

Subscriber
Joined
Jul 13, 2020
Messages
808
Location
Europe (EU)
Format
Multi Format
I read somewhere that the Ricohflex TLR with the geared lenses should be very easy to repair, just hearsay - I never worked on one.
 

Tel

Subscriber
Joined
May 9, 2011
Messages
970
Location
New Jersey
Format
Multi Format
I am surprised by the replies, as I expected the Zenit series at the top.


But I see that simply designed not necessary means simple to repair.
I think that ease of repair relies on both simple design and very exact manufacturing tolerances, so that parts are interchangeable. Many of the FSU cameras failed on the second requirement. (I'm thinking of the improvements Gevorg Vartanyan made to the Kiev cameras particularly.)
 

Helge

Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2018
Messages
3,938
Location
Denmark
Format
Medium Format
Agfa Syncro Box. Made to be serviced. And without special tools too. Like all cameras should be.
 

4season

Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
1,987
Format
Plastic Cameras
I am surprised by the replies, as I expected the Zenit series at the top.

But I see that simply designed not necessary means simple to repair.
Zenit is pretty simple, but Nikon F and Nikkormat FTN are better cameras, Nikkormat often sells for similar prices - in USA - as Zenit, and IMO the effort needed to service them isn't much different.
 

flavio81

Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2014
Messages
5,069
Location
Lima, Peru
Format
Medium Format
I think that ease of repair relies on both simple design and very exact manufacturing tolerances, so that parts are interchangeable. Many of the FSU cameras failed on the second requirement. (I'm thinking of the improvements Gevorg Vartanyan made to the Kiev cameras particularly.)

This, this and this.

And add, good quality materials. I'm already traumatized by finding some rusted screws in a soviet camera, which made them impossible to remove.

Also, add to that list, good service manuals. I'm opening a separate thread on Kiev 88 cameras because of the poor documentation available in english.
 

j-dogg

Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2010
Messages
1,542
Location
Floor-it-duh
Format
Multi Format
I am surprised by the replies, as I expected the Zenit series at the top.


But I see that simply designed not necessary means simple to repair.

Early Zenit was a walk in the park because they were the same as a Zorki but they added a prism and all the stuff is interchangeable. I've done the full CLA on my Zenit-S from 1959
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom