What is your favorite film developer?

Cimetière du Montparnasse

A
Cimetière du Montparnasse

  • 3
  • 4
  • 146
Chrome Halo 2

A
Chrome Halo 2

  • 1
  • 0
  • 158
Chrome Halo

A
Chrome Halo

  • 0
  • 0
  • 139
Narcissus

A
Narcissus

  • 1
  • 3
  • 130

Forum statistics

Threads
187,924
Messages
2,619,142
Members
96,892
Latest member
Dunkinjonaaat_
Recent bookmarks
0

What is your favorite film developer?


  • Total voters
    313

FrankB

Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2003
Messages
2,143
Location
Northwest UK
Format
Medium Format
Ilfotec DDX - One size fits all, liquid, one-shot. I switched over from Ilfosol-S when Ilford started recommending it across the board for their films. I do prefer it to Ilfosol... ...just don't ask me why or I'll whimper!
 

David A. Goldfarb

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 7, 2002
Messages
19,939
Location
Honolulu, HI
Format
Large Format
Agreed with veriwide on the Delta 400/Perceptol combo--really beautiful tonality and nice grain in a 400-speed film. I'd use it more if it came in sheet sizes.
 

JohnArs

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 20, 2002
Messages
1,074
Location
Switzerland
Format
Multi Format
Hi

XTol for everything because I like to work with the best, from a german labor test!
XTol is very dangerous and is not for every one, but some people asked me on a exibition, if my pictures are made from MF? But they have been 35mm 400 ASA film!
So to keep it simple I work from 35mm-4x5 with XTol!!
So take it only if you want the best!;-)))
 

Jim Chinn

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2002
Messages
2,512
Location
Omaha, Nebra
Format
Multi Format
As the forecast here is for snow this weekend, I will shift gears and do my annual testing of a couple new materials. I am going to be working with Pyrocat-HD and Perceptol. I am looking forward to trying the Pyrocat and have read very good things about it. I have also read pretty good praise for perceptol with Delta 400 from David Goldfarb and others so I will be comparing it to Xtol and Xtol/Rodinal combinations. So I may have to resubmit my poll answers later this winter.
 

philldresser

Subscriber
Joined
Feb 4, 2003
Messages
1,413
Location
Norwich, UK
Format
Multi Format
I have always used ID-11 (25 years) but mixed up some Pyrocat-HD from advice from APUG users. I cant wait to try this on my 5x4 FP4.All I need now is the weather to change from Zone V grey like it has been for the last week.

Phill
 

matt.s.

Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2002
Messages
30
For 35mm & medium format I use Calbe A49 1:1 (same as Agfa Atomal), This developer is outstanding with APX-400 & 100. In 8x10 I use Pyrocat-HD to process Fortepan 200 & Fp4 plus, also with excellent results.
 

SteveGangi

Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2002
Messages
485
Location
Southern Cal
Format
Multi Format
D76, 1 to 1. Why? It is easy to get, and its behavior is well known and predictable. I've always used it (and Microdol X occasionally as another "second" favorite").
 

FrankB

Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2003
Messages
2,143
Location
Northwest UK
Format
Medium Format
Newbie questions, forgive me if the answers are unbearably obvious!

Ilford recommend Ilfotec DDX across the board for all their B&W process films (correct me if I'm wrong), and yet I'm the only one here who's so far admitted to using it! So...

  • Why do Ilford recommend it?
    What benefits can I expect from switching to something else?
I primarily use FP4+ and Delta 400, with a little Delta 100 and Delta 3200 thrown in for good measure. All views / opinions / information gratefully received.

Thanks,

Frank
 

Eric Rose

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2002
Messages
6,802
Location
T3A5V4
Format
Multi Format
I use HC 110 for 99% of everything I do in B&W. Just a bit of PyroCat HD but might use it a bit more as I get use to it. I think if I was going to switch developers I would probably go to Xtol, but only if I switch to T grain technology type films such as TMax and Delta. Right now I enjoy APX and Tri-X to much to switch.
 

lee

Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2002
Messages
2,912
Location
Fort Worth T
Format
8x10 Format
I mainly use PMK as I stated before. But in the past I have used HC-110 and D-76 and Microdol-x. D-23 us a particular favorite of mine also. It really doesn't matter to me as long as I plan for the developer when I expose the film. All that matters is that it works the same way every time. I don't know about Pyrocat-HD but it receives good press.

lee\c
 

Donald Miller

Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2002
Messages
6,233
Format
Large Format
I used HC 110 for a lot of years. I have used ID 11 and D 76 as well during that period. I have recently used ABC Pyro and even more recently Pyrocat HD. The print tonality and sharpness is hands down in the corner of Pyro developers. I have found Pyrocat to be develop more evenly. It works very well both for negatives designed for enlarging and also for contact printing.
 

johnnywalker

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 23, 2002
Messages
2,322
Location
British Colu
Format
Multi Format
Good question Frank. I'm basically in the same boat as you and will also be interested in the answers!

John
 

Ole

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Sep 9, 2002
Messages
9,249
Location
Bergen, Norway
Format
Large Format
FrankB said:
Newbie questions, forgive me if the answers are unbearably obvious!

Ilford recommend Ilfotec DDX across the board for all their B&W process films (correct me if I'm wrong), and yet I'm the only one here who's so far admitted to using it! So...

  • Why do Ilford recommend it?
    What benefits can I expect from switching to something else?
I primarily use FP4+ and Delta 400, with a little Delta 100 and Delta 3200 thrown in for good measure. All views / opinions / information gratefully received.

Thanks,

Frank

Many of us who have used Ilford products for a long time have formed habits. DDX is relatively new, so we haven't tested it properly yet. It is a "universal" developer, optimised for the Delta films, which I don't use anyway. The large bottles make a lot of developer, more than I use before the concentrate dies on me. It is also suddenly unavailable in Norway, so I'm not likely to try it again.
 

Lex Jenkins

Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2003
Messages
229
Location
Fort Worth,
I got the impression that Ilford listed DD-X as *compatible* with a wide range of films. Not quite the same thing as *recommended* for a wide range of films.
 

Annemarieke

Member
Joined
May 27, 2003
Messages
434
Location
near Amsterd
Format
Medium Format
Frank, I also use Ilford DD-X in combination with FP4+ rollfilms. It is a great developer for that film! I used to use D76 (and still do sometimes because I can't find DD-X in Holland and have to order it from the UK), but I prefer the DD-X.
 

FrankB

Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2003
Messages
2,143
Location
Northwest UK
Format
Medium Format
Lex Jenkins said:
I got the impression that Ilford listed DD-X as *compatible* with a wide range of films. Not quite the same thing as *recommended* for a wide range of films.

To be honest, I'm not sure of the correct terminology on this one, Lex. As you correctly point out, the word "recommended" is mine not Ilford's.

I arrived at it by checking the current datasheets on Ilford's website. Each has a section entitled "Choosing the best Ilford developer for the job". The dev's are then split into powder and liquid. In the liquid column, DDX is generally (FP4+, HP5+, Delta 100, Delta 400, Delta 3200) listed as the choice for "Best overall image quality", "Finest grain", "Maximum film speed" and "One-shot convenience". The other categories are "maximum sharpness", "economy", "rapid processing" and "replenishable".

As my primary concerns are with image quality and (being a 35mm shooter) grain size (plus I like the convenience of a liquid) those were the criteria I used. I apologise if this was misleading.

Regards,

Frank
 
Joined
Jun 9, 2003
Messages
614
Location
Brazil
Format
35mm
Frank

From your criteria, I would seriously consider Xtol 1+1 or more dilluted, or one of it's equivalents (homebrew).

Jorge O
 

johnnywalker

Subscriber
Joined
Sep 23, 2002
Messages
2,322
Location
British Colu
Format
Multi Format
But why Xtol over the DDX? What exactly is better about it for the Ilford films mentioned?
John
 

Black Dog

Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2003
Messages
4,292
Location
Running up that hill
Format
Multi Format
Those wanting a homebrewed XTOL equivalent should try Mytol (see the Film Developing or Darkroom Cookbooks). See also D96 A in the former.
 
Joined
Jun 9, 2003
Messages
614
Location
Brazil
Format
35mm
John

Not exactly an answer for your question, but Xtol curves with many films (and other devs, also) are over here:

http://www.fotoimport.no/pg02/PG02-1-1.htm

It's in Norwegian, but it's possible to undestand some of the data (and the curves are self explanatory).

Look also at my favorite combo - PX and Xtol.

Jorge O
 
OP
OP

H. G. Hart

Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2003
Messages
17
Format
8x10 Format
this turned out to be a really great discussion. thanks to all those who contributed. it looks like everyone has their own opinion when it comes to developing film.
 

Adrian Twiss

Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2004
Messages
618
Location
Wigan (oop N
Format
Multi Format
I used Dixactol up until I moved house last year. I got negatives that were sharp, fine grained and very easy to print with minimal burning in. The Pyrocatechin and glycol combination gave beautifully graded negatives with lovely separation in the highlights. I was shocked and saddened to learn of Barry Thornton's death last year and am now looking for an alternative if Dixactol or any of its successors become no longer available. My researches lead me to try Pyrocat HD
 
Photrio.com contains affiliate links to products. We may receive a commission for purchases made through these links.
To read our full affiliate disclosure statement please click Here.

PHOTRIO PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Ilford ADOX Freestyle Photographic Stearman Press Weldon Color Lab Blue Moon Camera & Machine
Top Bottom